Yes, but it's not sad when I know the truth.
I basically have seen every Thor top feat (strength wise and speed wise definitely).
It's a smart thing to study characters who you will argue against (in Superman vs. Thor debates).
I have probably almost all of Thor's appearances in digital form and about 50 or more in paper form.
Originally posted by h1a8
Yes, but it's not sad when I know the truth.
I basically have seen every Thor top feat (strength wise and speed wise definitely).
It's a smart thing to study characters who you will argue against (in Superman vs. Thor debates).
I have probably almost all of Thor's appearances in digital form and about 50 or more in paper form.
You honestly don't come across as being that knowledgeable on Thor. Just imo, no offence.
Originally posted by h1a8
Yes, but it's not sad when I know the truth.
I basically have seen every Thor top feat (strength wise and speed wise definitely).
It's a smart thing to study characters who you will argue against (in Superman vs. Thor debates).
I have probably almost all of Thor's appearances in digital form and about 50 or more in paper form.
LOL!!!!!
Originally posted by -Pr-
You honestly don't come across as being that knowledgeable on Thor. Just imo, no offence.
But most importantly I'm very keen to his feats since I need to be in order to arguing Superman winning against him, which is my heart in soul topic of comic debating.
Originally posted by h1a8
I understand. But trust me, I'm a sleeper. I've been slowly expanding my collection on Thor comics and have a large percentage of them now. And this is after I've read quite a few Thor comics since I was young kid (my uncle left me a huge box of Thor comics). And after I studied long on his feats (through respect threads or scans people post throughout the years, etc.)But most importantly I'm very keen to his feats since I need to be in order to arguing Superman winning against him, which is my heart in soul topic of comic debating.
Ah....so you've just been pretending to be ignorant of his feats for the last several years?
Originally posted by JakeTheBankTrue but I read at least 50 Thor comics completely. Others I just skimmed through trying to find feats or verify feats etc. So yes I know most if not all of thor's best feats, especially his strength and speed ones.
Having a bunch of comics =/= knowing the characters that appear in them.
Originally posted by h1a8
True but I read at least 50 Thor comics completely. Others I just skimmed through trying to find feats or verify feats etc. So yes I know most if not all of thor's best feats, especially his strength and speed ones.
50 comics is only 4 years, Marvel Thor has been around since 1962.
Originally posted by Silent MasterNo, people just assume I didn't know about them (very few I didn't though to be honest). I just disagree with the feat proving a person's case. Maybe I should have stated the feat well before my opponent in order to seem as if I'm knowledgeable and at the same time dullen their rebuttal.
Ah....so you've just been pretending to be ignorant of his feats for the last several years?
Originally posted by h1a8
No, people just assume I didn't know about them (very few I didn't though to be honest). I just disagree with the feat proving a person's case. Maybe I should have stated the feat well before my opponent in order to seem as if I'm knowledgeable and at the same time dullen their rebuttal.
We assume that you don't know about Thor because your posts paint a picture of someone that has very little knowledge of the character he's talking about.
Originally posted by h1a8
I love Thor alot and said countless times that if he had the speed of Superman he would spite stomp Superman 10/10 and probably be at least a trans being. Speed is mostly the reason I give Superman and Surfer the win against him. Otherwise he would be top herald IMO.
See, I like Thor a lot too, but if you gave him explicit superspeed on the level of Kal or around that degree, I don't see him spite stomping Superman or any other top tier herald. He certainly wouldn't be trans.
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
See, I like Thor a lot too, but if you gave him explicit superspeed on the level of Kal or around that degree, I don't see him spite stomping Superman or any other top tier herald. He certainly wouldn't be trans.
I disagree. You agree that his versatility is what keeps him in the game against Superman right? If you take away Superman's best advantage, which is speed then there is no way for Superman to win. Thor being as fast as Superman would open up astronomical more options for him to beat Superman that didn't exist before, same against Surfer too.
Originally posted by Damborgson
so? Neither is Mjolnir. But he uses it as a tool. He clearly wasn't since he flew and beat the shit out of Gladiator without trouble.So gladiator being a retard is somehow Masterson cheating lol? Then masterson getting up and Gladiator rushing him is also a cheap shot. right? It's a fight. It's hard to have cheap shots. Now had it been at the beginning...
No proof since it didn't happen. He bounced back just fine and beat the **** out of him using his powers. Living lighting < a standard bolt from Thor. Deal with it, accept it. Who's everyone? Don't use the opinions of others that you don't even know to reinforce your argument. I most certainly am not going to speak for anyone else when I'm debating.
lol? K. Thor was trying to get Mjolnir from Masterson. Not beat the shit out of him like Gladiator was trying. And Thor overpowered Masterson on three seperate occasions where as Gladiator couldn't even once hehehehehehehehehehehehe.
yes.
Minus living lightning helping Masterson, show me one instance in that fight where Masterson had the advantage.