Superman Is Evil, Superman Goes On A Killing Spree

Started by abhilegend6 pages
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Which isn't relevant to everytime I discuss him. especially when all I'm saying is that he cheapshotted someone...

Yeah, it is not. Let's move on.

You don't even know the point you're making. If you're going to say dislike plays a factor, then it probably shouldn't be in a thread where I'm only saying Superman cheapshotted Billy as well showings where Cap did the same.[quote]
LOL.

[quote]K, it's not a cheapshot when you hit someone when they don't even know they're in a fight.

Its not a cheapshot if someone speeds in front of him and punches him in the face.

I guess it won't.

Yep.

It's so obviously a cheapshot that I'm literally dumbfounded that someone could think different.

🙄

Guess I'll just toss some shit into the wind.
What would you call this attack that Zod landed on Superman? Fair?
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o106/bigbran1/owned/ActionComics779-17.jpg

Guess, you forgot to post the page where superman had his back to zod and suddenly moved around only to get cheapshotted. I give you the real cheapshot.

Not that the zod reference has any meaning here. Its just one more red herring from you.

Cheapshotted.

No.

Although it's funny again that you brought up the Eclipso Superman fights, since like you said, Eclipso laid a beatdown on him (the first fight anyway) and couldn't KO him. Yet we're supposed to believe that Superman in a completely fair way can KO Cap with two punches?

Yeah, different fights and all that shit. Its like asking how hulk can KO thor if he hasn't koed him wailing upon him.

Or did he just cheapshot him?

No.
Yes. And fails to KO him.
He was gloating like you said.
He also got stuned too by Cap, but whatever.

Yeah, by a headbutt to the head. Good for him.

Like I mean, again failing to KO Cap in two punches. Isn't that the whole reason you brought up 219? Because Cap knocked out Superman with magic and "not cheapshots", but couldn't do it in 219?
Your point is? You think superman is going to KO marvel in every fight with two punches?
You realize by trying to combat Cap KO'ing Superman, that you're also combatting Superman KO'ing Cap...

Nope.

Like, this shit is as funny as it is sad. If you want to prove Superman can KO Cap in two punches as a legit feat (in a non cheapshot way), you should probably avoid bringing up fights where Superman landed huge shots on him without a KO.

This is another huge red herring. Just because superman doesn't go knocking out characters with on or two punches doesn't invalidates the showings where he actually koes them with two punches.

His lightning, maybe not, but him, yes.

No.

It is the same though. He landed on his face when Superman wasn't expecting it. Superman landed on Billy when he wasn't expecting it. Pretty cut and dry.

Not at all.

Superman knew he was in danger in every issue Billy cheapshotted him in...

How do you logic

From cap? Your reaching is hilarious.

We could have figured that out without him saying anything.

But following whatever your logic is, it wasn't a cheapshot because he foreshadowed it... I guess.

Lulz

Although you didn't even begin to explain why Superman cheapshotting Billy wasn't a cheapshot, but I guess that's it, maybe?
Because it was a blitz. That's it.

lol at desperate. You're the one who's saying that Superman attacking Billy without any warning at all isn't a cheapshot.

...

This would work out better if I wasn't talking to something as stubborn as a tree stump.

Yeah, desperate. But you aren't stubborn at all, I guess

One hit.

And?

Well, we've seen him cheapshot full Superman out with one shot is all I'm saying. More of a joke admittedly, but I don't think you understand those.

Ok.

And Billy didn't follow up.
Weakened. Superman.

You seem to be under the impression that I'm trying to argue that Cap can beat Superman, or vice versa.
Yeah, that's why you are writing these essays. Whatever suits you though.

I was just following the "speed/cheapshot" angle you were going with. When you were trying to say Superman is way too fast for Billy based on what happened when he cheapshotted him.
IE, Billy has KO'ed Superman with "not cheapshots", and Billy has "speedblitzed" Superman (the KO is entirely irrelevant to speed). I don't believe either proves anything, however, you do... but only if Superman does it.Really, if you weren't wearing red and blue colored glasses (3D), you'd see it's the exact same thing, and the original scans... scan doesn't mean much.
Ok, I guess.

Billy just wakes up and smiles then while shooting off a bolt?
Yeah, ask jeph loeb.
Also, I may be wrong, but Cap doesn't transform into Billy without the bolt anyway... so... Batman pretty much kicked him so hard it skipped a step, or Billy was tricking him and his magic skipped a step.
IIRC he has been converted to billy when knocked out once. That's more plausible than usual "LOLZ, batkick".
Either way, following your logic of establish history. He does turn into Billy in that story without the bolt. Just like he can be at full power with Mary powered up in the other. Funny how fun your logic can be.
The first scene is open to interpretation. The second is not.

And now you're just switching everything up because you got angry. But let's go with that.
Angry? LOL.
Superman shrugs off Billy while possessed by magical Eclipso.
Who gets weaker by sunlight.
Billy gets turned into Billy by Batman, and a throw.
No.

What does this have to do with speed... your original point?

Nothing. Initially I posted that scan as just a joke as a retort to your "billy's a beast" post.

No, I'm saying that cheapshotting someone is cheapshotting. Superspeed or not.

And if you weren't so stubborn, you'd say that too... but alas.


Listen, we're not going to agree upon anything and I don't want to write these essays again. Let's agree to disagree. You can have the last word here.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Its not a cheapshot if someone speeds in front of him and punches him in the face.
First off, we don't even know where Superman came from.

Second he attacked entirely without warning in a calm room.

Third or forth or whatever the hell we're on, I direct you again to these scans:

http://i45.tinypic.com/1znpxlc.jpg
http://i48.tinypic.com/2j0h2zr.jpg

Same exact same but in the middle of nowhere. Attacking out of nowhere with no warning is a cheapshot, no matter where it lands. And Cap went straight at Superman.
Although I wish you would have commented on the scans themselves so I could get an opinion of what you thought it was (fair, cheapshot, etc), but instead you got furious about it, ignored it, and talked about what happened afterwards.

Actually I guess you did kind of comment on it...

Originally posted by abhilegend
Superman was weakened and still wasn't out. Billy tried hitting superman with a total suckerpunch blitz in Action comics annual 4 too. Superman shrugged it off and beat the shit out of him.

It seems like you're implying that Cap cheapshotted Superman there, which again is the same thing that Superman did to Cap but in a much much smaller area.

Hmm. Fascinating isn't it?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Guess, you forgot to post the page where superman had his back to zod and suddenly moved around only to get cheapshotted. I give you the real cheapshot.

Not that the zod reference has any meaning here. Its just one more red herring from you.

And I guess you missed where Superman came out of nowhere to cheapshot Billy. At least Superman has some sort of warning in his. Billy had none.

But ya, relevant scans. I'm of the firm opinion that Cap did not cheapshot Supes...
And you brought up red herring right under these scans. The irony is delicious.

Yes, red herring, because I'm the one switching up my posts all the time, or failing to address shit.
It's the same thing. If Zod cheapshotted Superman, then Superman cheapshotted Billy, bluntly put.

I thought I'd go with examples rather than keep on going "LOOK AT THE PAGE WITH YOUR EYES!"

Originally posted by abhilegend
Yeah, by a headbutt to the head. Good for him.
Is that supposed to take away anything?

I mean, you're defending a blatant cheapshot, yet you have a problem with a headbutt?

Really

Originally posted by abhilegend
Your point is? You think superman is going to KO marvel in every fight with two punches?

My point is Superman has never KO'ed Billy with two shots outside of when he cheapshotted him.

Originally posted by abhilegend
This is another huge red herring. Just because superman doesn't go knocking out characters with on or two punches doesn't invalidates the showings where he actually koes them with two punches.
...

Like come on, did you forget what we were talking about?

You brought up the Eclipso fights because Cap KO'ed Superman with magic in 2 shots (and 1). And now you're opposed to me using them entirely in reverse. In a post where I was talking about you doing the same thing earlier.

Gold Jerry Gold.

But since I'll need to explain this to you:

You bring up Superman cheapshotting Cap.
I bring up Cap cheapshotting Supes.
You bring up how Cap's magic is "ineffective" against Superman when it wasn't a cheapshot.
I bring up how Superman couldn't KO Cap when he didn't cheapshot him from the fights you brought up.

You naturally have an issue with this and it doesn't invalidate Superman cheapshotting Cap (while ignoring that this same logic doesn't invalidate Billy).

Like, do you not see how you're pretty much arguing against your own logic?

If there was an exact replica of you that didn't like Superman but followed the exact same argument style and logic use... that'd probably be the greatest argument ever. No lie.

I'd sequence this but it'd make my essay longer. Essay.

Originally posted by abhilegend
From cap? Your reaching is hilarious.
You say this while Cap was cheapshotted when the only people in the room were good guys (and "sleeping" tps)

Of course it's reaching though. I stooped to your level afterall. I mean, Cap wasn't cheapshotted because he knew there was anger ahead of 34?
I didn't know how to take that response serious.

Like what. There's danger in every comic. If we follow this, nobody ever gets cheapshotted by anyone ever.

Hell, and to answer your question, yes by Cap. Despero was trapping every mind he could in one of them. Should have expected he'd come out of nowhere and smashed Superman... amirite?

No of course not, because even you don't agree with your logic being turned around (I know I sound like a broken record, but your logic is so easily turned around).

Originally posted by abhilegend
Because it was a blitz. That's it.

Yeah, desperate. But you aren't stubborn at all, I guess

But it wasn't just a blitz. He cheapshotted Billy at superspeed. Happens all the time.

And just saying "blitz" doesn't exactly answer why it was that and not a cheapshot either.
If you're going to just write off a scene where no one was in the same room other than the good guys and comatose telepaths, and Superman attacks Cap without warning, then you're probably going to need more than "blitz".

You sure like to throw out words without any backing behind them. Must have been the day Dora covered "desperate". She must have covered Red herring that week too for that matter...

Never said I wasn't. But you won't see me arguing that a shot that came out of nowhere with no warning at all is completely fair.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Weakened. Superman.
That's why Billy didn't follow up. Pity and all. Still irrelevant.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Yeah, that's why you are writing these essays. Whatever suits you though.
Essays... When I write an essay, you'll know it. I just like to actually address things, unlike certain others, and by certain others I mean you.

Although you got me confused with what the length of the post has to do with the content. Because my post is longer, I'm saying Cap can beat Superman (or vice versa)?
Looks like reading has betrayed you.

Or why the person who took his time to seperate every sentence in my previous post (to say one word answers...) is complaining about length.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Ok, I guess.

Yeah, ask jeph loeb.
IIRC he has been converted to billy when knocked out once. That's more plausible than usual "LOLZ, batkick".
The first scene is open to interpretation. The second is not.

Angry? LOL.
Who gets weaker by sunlight. No.

OK.

Jeph Loeb has him turning into Billy and conveniently waking up right when Batman arrives to immediately fire off a bolt of lightning...
Which can not be seen as Billy tricking him. It just can't.

But this little "blame it on the writers" thing you're playing with makes me wonder if the writers would agree with your stance.

Let me take your word for it...
...
But the Batkick would have been the one that KO'ed him...

The first one is open? But he turned into Billy without the bolt. Straight up, it's there. We must ignore all other comics according to your logic since only the comic it happened in matters.

Which leads me to my next part.

Where in that issue was it stated that Eclipso was weakened in Superman, and therefore made Superman weaker (it breaks the hold, not weakens the user anyway...).
Unless old one issue Abi wants to bring in things from other issues, because that's fine when Eclipso amps the users...

Probably shouldn't have brought up Eclipso.

Also, yes, angry. You didn't like the Cap scans so you changed your argument entirely to "Superman > Cap all day err day"

Originally posted by abhilegend
Nothing. Initially I posted that scan as just a joke as a retort to your "billy's a beast" post.
And were quite quick to defend it.
Not only that, but you thought it helped prove that Superman is way the shit faster than Cap.

Originally posted by abhilegend

"In the blink of even your eye I can be in the center of Metropolis."

Plus, you defending it by calling it a blitz instead made it look like that's what your point was.

But that's probably my mistake by assuming you actually had some semblance of focus as opposed to blind Superman devotion.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Listen, we're not going to agree upon anything and I don't want to write these essays again. Let's agree to disagree. You can have the last word here.
Concession accepted.

Also lol at acting like I need the last word. From someone who likes to call me a coward because I work for a living and don't argue till I the cows come home, this is a cute turn around.

But I'll take it, because the last word destroys arguments on this forum. Go me.

Although I think using "OK" to any point you can't refute kind of gave me that last word anyway... but I digress.

Whoops, forgot this.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Yeah, different fights and all that shit. Its like asking how hulk can KO thor if he hasn't koed him wailing upon him.

Fights?
More like the contrast behind cheapshots and fair fights.

And you really called me on red herring?
Two Marvel characters who've fought dozens of times where like 4 KO's have been achieved between them being brought up in defense of cheapshots?

And two happened when Hulk surprised Thor (if we count that one in 2001).

Ehhhhh

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Concession accepted.


😂

Originally posted by abhilegend
😂
You've gotta admit that it's hard not to use after quan spammed the shit out of it.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
You've gotta admit that it's hard not to use after quan spammed the shit out of it.

I agree.

Edit

Sorry, wrong thread