Avengers vs Death Eaters

Started by Casper Whitey51 pages

Originally posted by Nephthys
This is a really great point and why the opposition basically has no ground to stand on anymore.
Oh we have all the ground in the world, you silly man. Problem is that you just cannot accept it.

Originally posted by BlackZero30x
alright its quite easy.

Your making claim that Snape could simply turn things intangible and it seems there is no limit to this. All just because it appears to you he turned the gate intangible. There is still no proof either side of the argument for the gate...only speculation so looking at everything else he has not turned anything intangible through out every scene in every movie. To my knowledge that is so correct me if im wrong. Anyways if I am wrong prove to me it can turn not just one person but an entire group of people intangible.

I think I will have a seat on your couch and maybe turn on the tv now.

I made the claim based on evidence from movie footage and you denied it, claiming that Snape made the gate intangible, not himself. I countered this with "this makes the Death Eaters even more deadly", and you still denied it.

Then, DDM wanders in and totally rapes your argument in the mouth, and still you deny the truth.

Originally posted by Casper Whitey
Oh we have all the ground in the world, you silly man. Problem is that you just cannot accept it.

I made the claim based on evidence from movie footage and you denied it, claiming that Snape made the gate intangible, not himself. I countered this with "this makes the Death Eaters even more deadly", and you still denied it.

Then, DDM wanders in and totally rapes your argument in the mouth, and still you deny the truth.

What truth?

How does a non Death Eater making a gate intangible, make the Death Eaters more dangerous?

Originally posted by BlackZero30x
alright its quite easy.

Your making claim that Snape could simply turn things intangible and it seems there is no limit to this. All just because it appears to you he turned the gate intangible. There is still no proof either side of the argument for the gate...only speculation so looking at everything else he has not turned anything intangible through out every scene in every movie. To my knowledge that is so correct me if im wrong. Anyways if I am wrong prove to me it can turn not just one person but an entire group of people intangible.

I think I will have a seat on your couch and maybe turn on the tv now.

OK, then what are the limits? Size? It doesn't matter if he turned 1 or 1001 things intangible, fact is he turned something intangible with a flick of his wand.

Originally posted by Casper Whitey
Oh we have all the ground in the world, you silly man. Problem is that you just cannot accept it.

I don't see a counter-argument here.

Originally posted by Utrigita
What truth?
That Snape:

A: Made himself intangible, or

B: Made the gate intangible

And that this makes the wizards more dangerous. Do I really need to spell it out?

Originally posted by Nephthys
I don't see a counter-argument here.
Lol, OK, man. Reading is good.

Originally posted by Casper Whitey
That Snape:

A: Made himself intangible, or

B: Made the gate intangible

And that this makes the wizards more dangerous. Do I really need to spell it out?

How does a non Death Eater making a gate intangible, make the Death Eaters more dangerous?

Originally posted by Silent Master
How does a non Death Eater making a gate intangible, make the Death Eaters more dangerous?
Because as DDM stated, they can turn the Avengers intangible.

Or Thor's hammer, or Stark's armor.

Originally posted by Casper Whitey
Because as DDM stated, they can turn the Avengers intangible.

Or Thor's hammer, or Stark's armor.

Show feats of the Death Eaters turning people or objects intangible during battle.

Originally posted by Silent Master
How does a non Death Eater making a gate intangible, make the Death Eaters more dangerous?
Just told you.

Originally posted by Casper Whitey
Oh we have all the ground in the world, you silly man. Problem is that you just cannot accept it.

I made the claim based on evidence from movie footage and you denied it, claiming that Snape made the gate intangible, not himself. I countered this with "this makes the Death Eaters even more deadly", and you still denied it.

Then, DDM wanders in and totally rapes your argument in the mouth, and still you deny the truth.

Yes but the entire gate scene is SPECULATION. It was brought up because it shows he isn't intangible himself. thats the only thing it proves. You want me to submit that he can turn things intangible? ok lets roll with it. Show me where said spell works on living creatures or in battle. So in short what we have is one scene out of every scene in every movie that shows snape can possibly to turn non living creatures intangible. How does this warrant he can do it to what ever, who ever, or when ever he likes? It doesn't.

and people say its avenger fanboys wanking....

Originally posted by Casper Whitey
Just told you.

Show feats of the Death Eaters turning people or objects intangible during battle.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Show feats of the Death Eaters turning people or objects intangible during battle.
Lol, "during battle?" You serious? This the road you wanna go down?

K. Show me feats of any of the Avengers tracking teleporters and blocking magic spells, HARRY POTTER spells, mind you.

Originally posted by Casper Whitey
Lol, OK, man. Reading is good.

Read what? How have you counted the point that the gate is obviously magical since Snape had to land in front of it and use a spell to get past when if it wasn't he could have easily just have flown over? You didn't. You just postured like a fool like you usually do, unable to use your brain to form the meagreest of arguments.

The gate is magical, and as such the spell he uses cannot even begin to be said to be usable on anything else.

Originally posted by Casper Whitey
That Snape:

A: Made himself intangible, or

B: Made the gate intangible

And that this makes the wizards more dangerous. Do I really need to spell it out?

Easy mate, I have only been reading this page, I have no idea what came before in this what 30+ pages debate.

Yet the truth... said spell make the death eaters more dangerous, yet have they performed said spell against a living enemy? Wasn't the spell shown to have a time limit? How does it help the deatheaters that they turn the Avengers Intangible?

CM and DDM are basically trolling you guys now....

Originally posted by Casper Whitey
Lol, "during battle?" You serious? This the road you wanna go down?

K. Show me feats of any of the Avengers tracking teleporters and blocking magic spells, HARRY POTTER spells, mind you.

You're claiming that this is a spell that the Death Eaters know and would use during battle, that means the burden is on you.

Originally posted by BlackZero30x
Yes but the entire gate scene is SPECULATION. It was brought up because it shows he isn't intangible himself. thats the only thing it proves. You want me to submit that he can turn things intangible? ok lets roll with it. Show me where said spell works on living creatures or in battle. So in short what we have is one scene out of every scene in every movie that shows snape can possibly to turn non living creatures intangible. How does this warrant he can do it to what ever, who ever, or when ever he likes? It doesn't.

and people say its avenger fanboys wanking....

Ah, so you are proclaiming that you know the limits to Snape's spells then.

Cool.

I am proclaiming that HP magic will turn Thor into a teacup. Wait, how can I say that? Transfiguration was never used on a living being.........wait a minute......

YouTube video

WAIT WAIT WAIT, LET ME GUESS.....Thor is a magical being!!!!

Draco is a magical being. You just got raped.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You're claiming that this is a spell that the Death Eaters know and would use during battle, that means the burden is on you.

Is that so? Tell me, how do the Avengers track the teleporters? How does Thor strike teleporters with lightning? How does IM "rain death" on teleporters?