Originally posted by jaden101Experiences built that level of friendship and bond. They went through multiple experiences. Ask any war vet who was saved and see if they agree here.
Stop crying, troll boy. 2 films aren't enough to build up their relationship enough to warrant Spock's outburst of emotion. This is a fact.
Stupid complaint.
So it's 'at least 3' now is it? Will it be 4 or 5 this time tomorrow?
Here's the facts. After the 1st film they tolerated each other and had a grudging mutual respect for each other. By not even the end of the 2nd movie Spock, a Vulcan who showed no immediate emotion when his own mother died and his entire species was almost destroyed, yet he loses his shit and goes into a cry rage over Kirk straight away.
Needs context between movies to have built up their friendship to warrant that. Simple fact.
Originally posted by jaden101
So it's 'at least 3' now is it? Will it be 4 or 5 this time tomorrow?Here's the facts. After the 1st film they tolerated each other and had a grudging mutual respect for each other. By not even the end of the 2nd movie Spock, a Vulcan who showed no immediate emotion when his own mother died and his entire species was almost destroyed, yet he loses his shit and goes into a cry rage over Kirk straight away.
Needs context between movies to have built up their friendship to warrant that. Simple fact.
He has no comparison since he's a know-nothing of the OS and the OS films and he's beyond listening to reason, you might as well be trying to explain this to a brick wall.
Originally posted by jaden101You just don't know what true friendship is.
So it's 'at least 3' now is it? Will it be 4 or 5 this time tomorrow?Here's the facts. After the 1st film they tolerated each other and had a grudging mutual respect for each other. By not even the end of the 2nd movie Spock, a Vulcan who showed no immediate emotion when his own mother died and his entire species was almost destroyed, yet he loses his shit and goes into a cry rage over Kirk straight away.
Needs context between movies to have built up their friendship to warrant that. Simple fact.
You are damaged, your soul is corrupt.
2 films are enough because the alternative is to see the two bickering like spouses for an entite ****ing movie. Again.
Which would ****ing suck. In TV shows people are used to seeing character development happen over the course of a season or two. Movies don't have that luxery. I'd bet money that the audience would be rolling their eyes if we had to see Spock.X Kirk doing the angry **** for the entire film yet again.
Originally posted by jaden101I was saying that to mock you. Saved his life twice so that's enough experience right there alone to cement a life long bond.
So it's 'at least 3' now is it? Will it be 4 or 5 this time tomorrow?Here's the facts. After the 1st film they tolerated each other and had a grudging mutual respect for each other. By not even the end of the 2nd movie Spock, a Vulcan who showed no immediate emotion when his own mother died and his entire species was almost destroyed, yet he loses his shit and goes into a cry rage over Kirk straight away.
Needs context between movies to have built up their friendship to warrant that. Simple fact.
Originally posted by Sadako of GirthSo we need seasons or Star Trek to justify this? It's a damn movie.
Agreed. The friendship was built over like the best part of 20 years in Wrath of Khan. With so little history (one year) between Kirk and Spock, it does seem a little forced in the context of STs XI and XII.
Originally posted by Tzeentch._Exactly.
2 films are enough because the alternative is to see the two bickering like spouses for an entite ****ing movie. Again.Which would ****ing suck. In TV shows people are used to seeing character development happen over the course of a season or two. Movies don't have that luxery. I'd bet money that the audience would be rolling their eyes if we had to see Spock.X Kirk doing the angry **** for the entire film yet again.
These phucking nerds...
Glad some of us understand.
Originally posted by -Pr-I consider myself a reboot Trekkie. Watching the old films despite the problems I had with them to me they seemed just not quality films anyways as well as sub par special effects until reboots came into my world.
If you like Star Trek at all, you're a Trekkie. Or Trekker. Unless you really just don't like the new movies enough, which is fine I suppose.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I consider myself a reboot Trekkie. Watching the old films despite the problems I had with them to me they seemed just not quality films anyways as well as sub par special effects until reboots came into my world.
So still a trekkie then. Okay. Kind of odd to have so much biased hate towards the franchise that the reboots came from, but okay.
lol @ subpar special effects. At least half of the movies have quality effects work.
Originally posted by marwash22
you think so?i like the reboot, but I wouldn't call myself a Trekkie, if not only out of respect for the title and those who are hardcore about the franchise.
There are different levels of trekkie/trekker.