Voldemort vs. Albus Dumbledore

Started by quanchi112183 pages

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You ignore context all the time. Like how you think Yoda's reactions are 4 seconds or longer. This blatantly false... Since we've seen him react to things in under a second. He's avoided multiple saber strikes in under 2 seconds. So how could his reaction time to attacks be 4 seconds? Yet that is what you'll claim, ignoring that it didn't take Yoda 4 seconds... It reacted in UNDER a second. He stopped it, THAT was his reaction time. Him casually tossing it away ISN'T included in his reaction time. Yet it's context like the above you ignore constantly. So unless you start conceding to context, then you'll receive the same. Which is....

Tom was unable to defeat a little baby boy who couldn't even defend himself. Cool? Cool

In the clip you posted to long ranged attacks they were. Quit lying about what I did say with a hit your mini brain thinks I said. If someone can hit a hundre mile fastball does that mean they can avoid much slower punches in close combat ? Don't you see the difference. Reacting to what Aoe one else does is their reaction time you tard. It isn't the time he takes to attack it's the time he takes to attack first or counter that is his reaction time.

Context as I explained negates your retarded post.

Originally posted by quanchi112
In the clip you posted to long ranged attacks they were. Quit lying about what I did say with a hit your mini brain thinks I said. If someone can hit a hundre mile fastball does that mean they can avoid much slower punches in close combat ? Don't you see the difference. Reacting to what Aoe one else does is their reaction time you tard. It isn't the time he takes to attack it's the time he takes to attack first or counter that is his reaction time.

Context as I explained negates your retarded post.

No it isn't. Him countering has NOTHING to do with his reactions time you idiot. Yoda NEVER countered those TK attacks from Dooku... he stopped them and then threw them away. By your logic, he never reacted if it requires a counter. Which is exactly why your logic is idioctic

It's hard to react to things CLOSER you idiot... not only closer but you're reacting to things WHILE JUMPING AROUND AND FLIPPING AROUND. Yet you're still able to do all that, strike and block. that takes VASTLY faster reactions than....

Fight starts with combatants x feet away... Ready set go... HOW IS THAT HARDER TO REACT TO YOU IDIOT. It's easier, not harder.

To illustrate the point, if a boxer parries a shot... THAT was his reaction time, not how long it took him to fight a counter shot. That is a DIFFERENT reaction. That is your counter reaction speed. You claimed that Yoda took 4 seconds to react to an attack. He did no such thing.. he reacted to long range attacks in under a second. He saw the attack coming... Block it... he reacted and stopped the attack.

Simple, either get the context right or again

Tom wasn't able to defeat somebody who was unable to defend himself and was a baby.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
No it isn't. Him countering has NOTHING to do with his reactions time you idiot. Yoda NEVER countered those TK attacks from Dooku... he stopped them and then threw them away. By your logic, he never reacted if it requires a counter. Which is exactly why your logic is idioctic

It's hard to react to things CLOSER you idiot... not only closer but you're reacting to things WHILE JUMPING AROUND AND FLIPPING AROUND. Yet you're still able to do all that, strike and block. that takes VASTLY faster reactions than....

Fight starts with combatants x feet away... Ready set go... HOW IS THAT HARDER TO REACT TO YOU IDIOT. It's easier, not harder.

To illustrate the point, if a boxer parries a shot... THAT was his reaction time, not how long it took him to fight a counter shot. That is a DIFFERENT reaction. That is your counter reaction speed. You claimed that Yoda took 4 seconds to react to an attack. He did no such thing.. he reacted to long range attacks in under a second. He saw the attack coming... Block it... he reacted and stopped the attack.

Simple, either get the context right or again

Tom wasn't able to defeat somebody who was unable to defend himself and was a baby.

Again he didn't react until four seconds later. That's indisputable and you ironically posted it yet want to ignore it. You're a biased ****.

It is harder to react to things closer hence why he can't dodge a blaster up close. The range in which the attack is employed is further away.

Again context you ****.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Again he didn't react until four seconds later. That's indisputable and you ironically posted it yet want to ignore it. You're a biased ****.

It is harder to react to things closer hence why he can't dodge a blaster up close. The range in which the attack is employed is further away.

Again context you ****.

🙂

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
🙂
Voldemort wins, troll.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Voldemort wins, troll.

How does he win when his face is being torn apart?

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
How does he win when his face is being torn apart?
His face isn't torn apart here, troll.

Originally posted by quanchi112
His face isn't torn apart here, troll.

His face sure looks like its getting the business here:

🙂

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
His face sure looks like its getting the business here:

🙂

Voldemort wins.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Voldemort wins.

Whats the matter?

Voldemort dying like a cheap wh0r3 bothers you?

🙂

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Whats the matter?

Voldemort dying like a cheap wh0r3 bothers you?

🙂

Voldemort wins.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Voldemort wins.

Say...

A very important person has something crucial to tell you that you ought to know:

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Say...

A very important person has something crucial to tell you that you ought to know:

Voldemort wins.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You agreed Albus interfered. Game. Set. Match. Quit lying.

Ignoring the context and flat out lying. You're such a troll.

Tom attacked and then rage quit. As per your own standards he lost and lost hard. 😂

Again according to your own standards being outnumbered by non actively attacking foes is no reason to flee. Tom fled. Cowardice 😂

Originally posted by juggerman
Tom attacked and then rage quit. As per your own standards he lost and lost hard. 😂

Again according to your own standards being outnumbered by non actively attacking foes is no reason to flee. Tom fled. Cowardice 😂

No, since he was there to go after Harry not Albus.

Common sense is something you're missing and another reason no one will ever take you into battlezone. You're a joke who shows up as my own personal *****.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, since he was there to go after Harry not Albus.

Common sense is something you're missing and another reason no one will ever take you into battlezone. You're a joke who shows up as my own personal *****.

He chose to attack albus. And then he chose to flee like a b1tch 😂

The reason you won't BZ me is because you're a coward just like your hero 😂

Originally posted by juggerman
He chose to attack albus. And then he chose to flee like a b1tch 😂

The reason you won't BZ me is because you're a coward just like your hero 😂

Albus chose to interfere. Cowardly move my Albus.

I do not respect you nor does anyone else. You won't ever do one, amigo.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Albus chose to interfere. Cowardly move my Albus.

I do not respect you nor does anyone else. You won't ever do one, amigo.

Albus gave Tom a way out. He chose to engage and then ragequit. Incompetent

Coward

Originally posted by juggerman
Albus gave Tom a way out. He chose to engage and then ragequit. Incompetent

Coward

He showed up to protect Harry. You denying this is another reason I can't ever entertain a serious debate against you.

Yes, you are. Not one single battlezone to your resume.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He showed up to protect Harry. You denying this is another reason I can't ever entertain a serious debate against you.

Yes, you are. Not one single battlezone to your resume.

You denying Tom attacked 1st and then ragequit just proves your knob slobbin bias

And yet you still fear me 😂