Voldemort vs. Albus Dumbledore

Started by juggerman183 pages

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes.

Established continuity of him moving his wand and creating a force.

No.

He repelled the possession he didn't win just as someone can resist a bear hug. My analogy is perfect no resisting a bear hug means you won.

😂

No.

There have been more times that he has moved his hands and creating no force. So what evidence do you have that he used it right then and there?

Si

Voldemort tried and failed to control Harry. A better analogy would be you trying to push someone out of a chair because you want that seat. Him resisting means you failed and you lost. Simple really

Originally posted by juggerman
No.

There have been more times that he has moved his hands and creating no force. So what evidence do you have that he used it right then and there?

Si

Voldemort tried and failed to control Harry. A better analogy would be you trying to push someone out of a chair because you want that seat. Him resisting means you failed and you lost. Simple really

Yes.

So you don't think Voldemort would try to create a force to break the bubble ? 😂

Dude, you say stupid shit.

Nope.

Resisting s bear hug doesn't mean you beat anyone it just means you resisted a bear hug. Youre biased.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes.

So you don't think Voldemort would try to create a force to break the bubble ? 😂

Dude, you say stupid shit.

Nope.

Resisting s bear hug doesn't mean you beat anyone it just means you resisted a bear hug. Youre biased.

No.

So you have no evidence?

Must have learned it from you

Yup

You trying and failing to push someone out of a chair is a much better analogy. Your love for Tommy clouds your reason

Originally posted by juggerman
No.

So you have no evidence?

Must have learned it from you

Yup

You trying and failing to push someone out of a chair is a much better analogy. Your love for Tommy clouds your reason

Yes.

I have common sense and established continuity. You think Voldemoet doesn't try to break free for ****s sake you're a child

Nah.

That isn't winning and he succeeded with the bear hug just he broke it after time. That isn't winning, sport.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes.

I have common sense and established continuity. You think Voldemoet doesn't try to break free for ****s sake you're a child

Nah.

That isn't winning and he succeeded with the bear hug just he broke it after time. That isn't winning, sport.

No

You have speculation nothing more. It's quite sad actually

Yup

He tried to take over his mind and failed and lost. You can try this false equivalency stuff but it won't fly son

Originally posted by juggerman
No

You have speculation nothing more. It's quite sad actually

Yup

He tried to take over his mind and failed and lost. You can try this false equivalency stuff but it won't fly son

Yes.

I have common sense and continuity you have neither.

Nah.

He did take over his body and mind but he repelled him with the help.

Saying a repelled attack is a win is stupid. You say stupid things. Smarten up, kid.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes.

I have common sense and continuity you have neither.

Nah.

He did take over his body and mind but he repelled him with the help.

Saying a repelled attack is a win is stupid. You say stupid things. Smarten up, kid.

No.

You have nothing but speculation and fanboism

Yup

He tried and failed.

He was beaten by a kid. Again. And not for the last time either

Originally posted by juggerman
No.

You have nothing but speculation and fanboism

Yup

He tried and failed.

He was beaten by a kid. Again. And not for the last time either

YES.

I CITED CONTINUITY AND COMMON SENSE. You did not.

Nah.

One tactic didn't mean he lost the fight.

The kid had help. Ina. Duel Voldemort disarmed him easily. That's a win. 😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
YES.

I CITED CONTINUITY AND COMMON SENSE. You did not.

Nah.

One tactic didn't mean he lost the fight.

The kid had help. Ina. Duel Voldemort disarmed him easily. That's a win. 😂

No

I CAN CAPS LOCK TOO!!!!!! You have no evidence, just wishful thinking

Yup

He lost. It was his only attack attempted and it utterly failed

Too bad he didn't try to duel him again then huh? Might not have lost to a child

Originally posted by juggerman
No

I CAN CAPS LOCK TOO!!!!!! You have no evidence, just wishful thinking

Yup

He lost. It was his only attack attempted and it utterly failed

Too bad he didn't try to duel him again then huh? Might not have lost to a child

Yes.

I have continuity which is evidence and common sense. You have nothing.

Nah.

He resisted an attack. He lost the duel which is why Albus intervened. I'm right you're wrong.

Voldemort already won the duel.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes.

I have continuity which is evidence and common sense. You have nothing.

Nah.

He resisted an attack. He lost the duel which is why Albus intervened. I'm right you're wrong.

Voldemort already won the duel.

No

What continuity shows him using force powers in a water bubble?

Yup

He beat Tom at his own game. Fact

And he lost the mind battle

Originally posted by juggerman
No

What continuity shows him using force powers in a water bubble?

Yup

He beat Tom at his own game. Fact

And he lost the mind battle

Yes.

We see his powers work fine with him creating force while waving his wand. If you feel his powers do not work in a water bubble then it's up to you to prove it.

He resisted. That's all. He had help.

No, he resisted the tactic. Tom won the duel.
😂

The creator of the universe in question says Albus is No. 1... so.. he's no. 1

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
The creator of the universe in question says Albus is No. 1... so.. he's no. 1
In the books this is the movie universe, dummy.

Voldemort wins.

She was the lead in the creating of the movie. She was the no. 1 resource for the movie. IF she feels Albus is no. 1 in the books.. that doesn't change for the movies. Albus wins!!

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
She was the lead in the creating of the movie. She was the no. 1 resource for the movie. IF she feels Albus is no. 1 in the books.. that doesn't change for the movies. Albus wins!!
They altered sequences based off the director for the film. The film isn't the books. I have bonus features confirming my claims as well as feats, logic.

Films only, loser.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes.

We see his powers work fine with him creating force while waving his wand. If you feel his powers do not work in a water bubble then it's up to you to prove it.

He resisted. That's all. He had help.

No, he resisted the tactic. Tom won the duel.
😂

Nah

It's up to you to prove he did something we did not see.

He bested Tom at something Tom excels at. That's like a pee-wee football team beating an NFL team. WEAK!

Harry put Tom in his place and he never tried that old BS again 😂

I bel be its actaully stayed in an interview that in the deal they made with Rowling one of the conditions was she have a part in making it or she was like in some form of control. She was a producer for the last two and creative consultants in the rest. She even chose some of the actors herself, and the movies don't really trail off form her vision in the sense once character is more powerful than the other. What would be the point?

Here's the thing. Dumbleodre for the majority was on the defense and even then was pushing tom back. Now imagine if he went on total offense se or at least a more aggressive front. We've already seen him hit Tom whilst not just like goigm all out offensively, now imagine him actually pressing an offense the entire fight.

Originally posted by juggerman
Nah

It's up to you to prove he did something we did not see.

He bested Tom at something Tom excels at. That's like a pee-wee football team beating an NFL team. WEAK!

Harry put Tom in his place and he never tried that old BS again 😂

Yes.

I provided continuity and applied common sense to the scene. Do you think a wizard of his class just didn't use any of his abilities ?

Through help. He resisted an attack.

Harry was defeated and rather easily.