Saint Of Killers VS Thanos

Originally posted by zopzop
How long was he supposed to survive having a significant chunk of his head shot off though?

But whatever, I should have worded my question better.

Originally posted by zopzop
How long was he supposed to survive having a significant chunk of his head shot off though?

But whatever, I should have worded my question better.

Well, by the text itself the wounds would be fatal, but if Thanos isn't wounded he shouldn't be affected in the least. The never misfiring-thing doesn't seem specific enough for me to interpret it as "goes through anything", so I'll gladly say there is actually a case for Thanos to take this.

Good job Zop, some of the arguments were iffy, but it's not a bad show, using Ennis's half-_ssed interest in his characters works for me as it is depicted in the story.

If Thanos was to be hurt -and he has been pierced by regular arrows-, it would be a different thing, but as it is...

I dont see how that scan proves anything. It says that the shot will be fatal. I guess you think that that makes Thanos win?

Is this logic in your world? There has always been character inconsistancies in comics. Superman gets beaten by some chump one comic, then he owns the universe in another. Great job for pointing out silly nonsense.

LIsten up cupcake, and try to understand this question.

Who in the entire comic beside a vampire, who the writer said was a mistake, did not die from the wonds inflicted by the SOK?

Originally posted by ThereIsHope
I dont see how that scan proves anything. It says that the shot will be fatal. I guess you think that that makes Thanos win?

Is this logic in your world? There has always been character inconsistancies in comics. Superman gets beaten by some chump one comic, then he owns the universe in another. Great job for pointing out silly nonsense.

It says that a wound of the shot will be fatal, if you don't get wounded you don't die, that's just the implications of the statement.

The point of the fight would be that Thanos would get shot. Also the guns never miss correct?

It says they'll never misfire, not that they'll cut through any shields, if Thanos puts up a shield I don't see why to assume they'll just go through it.

If they never miss, they would go through them since they are divinely empowered.

Originally posted by ThereIsHope
Also the guns never miss correct?

Ah, I read the bad line to get my interpretation "No shot they fired would miss its mark", indeed, we can assume that such statement gives them properties we've never seen on the comic. Troublesome to say the least.

The only thing that Sok even shot that had some sort of immortality and a healing factor is Cass.

But oh no, that's pis because the character was like Deadpool and no way should it be useable in defense of Thanos who was also like Deadpool (except way more powerful in every way)? No we should focus on him killing the no feat angels who got trashed consistently throughout the comic (Custer gave one a massive bruise with one punch), and who were killing each other with iron weapons.
Would Satan and AOD follow their power levels, considering they're both angels? Maybe.
And then there's God who was worldly and he most likely created the planet on his throne, since he was kind of pathetic...his feats are ripping Custer's eye out, and rezzing him directly after dying. He was a manipulator for love, not some all powerful being. Honestly, nothing he did, or could have possibly did is above Odin, and that's factoring in him being on his throne.

Sok shot through tank's. That's it. That's the big feat where nothing would stop his bullets. Impressive yes, but not even on a meta level. This is not evidence of him breaching Thanos' shields.

If a guy with the exact same feats on the exact same level happened in main marvel or dc, they'd have him go against Low heralds. Especially against a guy who's been hit by the IG, got a sword meant to kill him slosh around in him for like a minute, among others already said.
And another question, but how does Sok killing kill able beings mean he can override an actual universal abstracts power and kill Thanos? I mean no shit the guns going to kill anything when you only have one guy in your entire comic with a healing factor and a source of immortality (and he survived, imagine that). We suddenly no limits fallacy to include immortal beings and generally anyone? Laughable

Also, did Bently just bring up Hawkeye's arrows? I sure hope he likes the Cass feat then.

zop hacked bran's account.

...Heh, I'm so silly. 👆

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
The only thing that Sok even shot that had some sort of immortality and a healing factor is Cass.

But oh no, that's pis because the character was like Deadpool and no way should it be useable in defense of Thanos who was also like Deadpool (except way more powerful in every way)? No we should focus on him killing the no feat angels who got trashed consistently throughout the comic (Custer gave one a massive bruise with one punch), and who were killing each other with iron weapons.
Would Satan and AOD follow their power levels, considering they're both angels? Maybe.
And then there's God who was worldly and he most likely created the planet on his throne, since he was kind of pathetic...his feats are ripping Custer's eye out, and rezzing him directly after dying. He was a manipulator for love, not some all powerful being. Honestly, nothing he did, or could have possibly did is above Odin, and that's factoring in him being on his throne.

Sok shot through tank's. That's it. That's the big feat where nothing would stop his bullets. Impressive yes, but not even on a meta level. This is not evidence of him breaching Thanos' shields.

If a guy with the exact same feats on the exact same level happened in main marvel or dc, they'd have him go against Low heralds. Especially against a guy who's been hit by the IG, got a sword meant to kill him slosh around in him for like a minute, among others already said.
And another question, but how does Sok killing kill able beings mean he can override an actual universal abstracts power and kill Thanos? I mean no shit the guns going to kill anything when you only have one guy in your entire comic with a healing factor and a source of immortality (and he survived, imagine that). We suddenly no limits fallacy to include immortal beings and generally anyone? Laughable

Also, did Bently just bring up Hawkeye's arrows? I sure hope he likes the Cass feat then.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Lol this thread isn't even to the death

Originally posted by ODG

Originally posted by ODG
Classic flopflop.

Suck a dick

Am I the only one who finds it odd that a.) people are saying God is weak because he doesn't have feats, and b.) that people are comparing Thanos to God?

That just seems weird to me.

Originally posted by Galan007
Am I the only one who finds it odd that a.) people are saying God is weak because he doesn't have feats, and b.) that people are comparing Thanos to God?

That just seems weird to me.

sam

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Suck a dick

Originally posted by Galan007
Am I the only one who finds it odd that a.) people are saying God is weak because he doesn't have feats, and b.) that people are comparing Thanos to God?

That just seems weird to me.

Anything he did however put him Skyfather range, with his throne most likely