United States Military vs ALL HP wizards

Originally posted by dadudemon
The burden of proof is not on them: it can block physical stuff...and that's is as far as they need to go. The only thing seen taking down a shield is magic: that is its limit (anti-shield magic).

It has blocked "physical stuff", ergo it can black all "physical stuff"? That's a No Limit Fallacy, considering the only "physical stuff" we see it blocking is arrows and small magic bolts that may not kill in one hit. Could it block the Death Star's beam? Superman flying at it at light+ speeds? You know better.

Originally posted by Robtard
It has blocked "physical stuff", ergo it can black all "physical stuff"? That's a No Limit Fallacy, considering the only "physical stuff" we see it blocking is arrows and small magic bolts that may not kill in one hit. Could it block the Death Star's beam? Superman flying at it at light+ speeds? You know better.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You need to prove the bombs can easily break through since that is your claim. You can't say bombs easily kill them and expect that to be debating. It isn't either man up or back down.

You first made the claim "shields stop bombs", so it's on you and yes, I understand that you can't provide feats and will continue to troll with your nonsense "limits fallacy" angle.

"We've never not seen a wizard shield get destroyed by god, so god can't" Wakka wakka wakka.

Originally posted by Robtard
You first made the claim "shields stop bombs", so it's on you and yes, I understand that you can't provide feats and will continue to troll with your nonsense "limits fallacy" angle.

"We've never not seen a wizard shield get destroyed by god, so god can't" Wakka wakka wakka.

Originally posted by quanchi112
They block physical force. It's like saying prove they can block a knife since we have never seen someone throw a knife into this mega shield. Bombs unleash a force so prove that blast easily destroys the shield. If you cannot you concede along with silent master who has already conceded to me.

Fail. You can prove they can block a knife, since we know they can block arrows and arrows hit with more force than a knife. That's a comparable and logical conclusion.

Keep dancing, it's all you've ever had since you first made the "shields can stop bombs" claim which you can't support, girly-man.

Originally posted by Robtard
Fail. You can prove they can block a knife, since we know they can block arrows and arrows hit with more force than a knife. That's a comparable and logical conclusion.

Keep dancing, it's all you've ever had since you first made the "shields can stop bombs" claim which you can't support.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I was just using it as an example. You already decided the amount of force in your head the shields can block but can't prove it and are crying about it. Prove a bomb can easily break a shield. prove a bomb hits with greater force than all the wizards bolts combined prior to it shattering.

LOL, and the example failed on you so you continue to dance. Incorrect, you started off with a No Limit Fallacy, shields being able to block all force.

You made the claim, so it's on you to prove "wizard bolts" hit harder than say a tank busting missile. Cos we already know the missile hits harder than an arrow. You can't, so you'll dance.

Originally posted by quanchi112
They block physical force. It's like saying prove they can block a knife since we have never seen someone throw a knife into this mega shield. Bombs unleash a force so prove that blast easily destroys the shield. If you cannot you concede along with silent master who has already conceded to me.

You're aware that there are different levels of physical force, right?

Originally posted by Robtard
LOL, and the example failed on you so you continue to dance. Incorrect, you started off with a No Limit Fallacy, shields being able to block all force.

You made the claim, so it's on you to prove "wizard bolts" hit harder than say a tank busting missile. Cos we already know the missile hits harder than an arrow. You can't, so you'll dance.

Hundreds of wizards bolts on top of Voldemort going banshee on it finally brought it down. Now hop to it.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You're aware that there are different levels of physical force, right?

LOL the military side demand feats yet they can provide a grand total of zero evidence to show that a bomb will break a shield.

Also, a regular shield was shown to block projectiles and Harry from falling a hundred feet (which would have quite bit of force). At max they can generate these.

YouTube video

I showed the shields block any physical impact done to it. Burden of proof is on you to prove that bombs will damage it.

Originally posted by Lestov16
LOL the military side demand feats yet they can provide a grand total of [b]zero evidence to show that a bomb will break a shield. [/B]

Because a tank busting missile hits harder than an arrow, as an example, troll.

Originally posted by Lestov16
LOL the military side demand feats yet they can provide a grand total of [b]zero evidence to show that a bomb will break a shield. [/B]

The burden is on the people claiming that a shield can block a bomb.

Originally posted by quanchi112
They can block force but I never said they can resist an infinite amount of force. Ever. I think hundreds of bolts from wizards is greater than one bomb shown in the movie. You don't but since you made the claim the onus is on you since it does block physical force.

Hundreds of wizards bolts on top of Voldemort going banshee on it finally brought it down. Now hop to it.

Fair enough you think that. Repeat: Quantify the power/force output of "hundreds of bolts". That is your claim, support it and prove 'hundreds of bolts' > bombs. Go!

Originally posted by Silent Master
The burden is on the people claiming that a shield can block a bomb.

Originally posted by Robtard
Fair enough you think that. Repeat: Quantify the power/force output of "hundreds of bolts". That is your claim, support it and prove 'hundreds of bolts' > bombs. Go!

Originally posted by Robtard
It has blocked "physical stuff", ergo it can black all "physical stuff"?

That's a strawman.

It can block physical stuff ergo it can block physical stuff.

Saying it can also block a huge amount of physical stuff is the leap you're making which makes your rhetorical question a strawman. If you read my post, I covered this in depth. Instead, you cherry picked a quote and took it out of context.

Originally posted by Robtard
That's a No Limit Fallacy, considering the only "physical stuff" we see it blocking is arrows and small magic bolts that may not kill in one hit.

Actually, it would be a limit's fallacy to say a bomb breaks the shield: there is no evidence that a bomb can do that and a bomb is not some astronomical force as to force a no-limits fallacy to occur.

Originally posted by Robtard
Could it block the Death Star's beam? Superman flying at it at light+ speeds? You know better.

Prove that either of those would break it. 😐

Bam. The bane of your argument is revealed.

I am quite positive what the limit on the shield's are: strong anti-shield magic. It was shown onscreen and everything.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You made the claim the bombs easily kill them. I just gave you my opinion. Since you made the original claim the onus is on you.

LoL, prove a bomb can kill a person with just above human durability? Stop being stupid, okay.

Incorrect. You first made the "shield stops bombs".

Fair enough you think that. Repeat: Quantify the power/force output of "hundreds of bolts". That is your claim, support it and prove 'hundreds of bolts' > bombs. Go!

Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, prove a bomb can kill a person with just above human durability? Stop being stupid, okay.

Incorrect. You first made the "shield stops bombs".

Fair enough you think that. Repeat: Quantify the power/force output of "hundreds of bolts". That is your claim, support it and prove 'hundreds of bolts' > bombs. Go!

Shields stop physical force. You agree to this so I have proven as much as I can. Your original claim was bombs easily kill them so it's on you to prove the bombs have greater physical force than the shields can withstand.

I don't have to since you already agreed the shielding blocks physical force. You are embarrassing yourself again. Don't you tire of the self induced humiliation you put yourself through on a daily basis on here.