United States Military vs ALL HP wizards

Originally posted by dadudemon
That's a strawman.

It can block physical stuff ergo it can block physical stuff.

Saying it can also block a huge amount of physical stuff is the leap you're making which makes your rhetorical question a strawman. If you read my post, I covered this in depth. Instead, you cherry picked a quote and took it out of context.

Actually, it would be a limit's fallacy to say a bomb breaks the shield: there is no evidence that a bomb can do that and a bomb is not some astronomical force as to force a no-limits fallacy to occur.

Prove that either of those would break it. 😐

Bam. The bane of your argument is revealed.

I am quite positive what the limit on the shield's are: strong anti-shield magic. It was shown onscreen and everything.

Not all physical force is the same, unless you want to go on record as saying that a random thug can hit as hard as Superman.

Now, what feats do the shields have a blocking the level of physical force that would be generated by a bomb?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Not all physical force is the same, unless you want to go on record as saying that a random thug can hit as hard as Superman.

Now, what feats do the shields have a blocking the level of physical force that would be generated by a bomb?

Originally posted by dadudemon
That's a strawman.

It can block physical stuff ergo it can block physical stuff.

Saying it can also block a huge amount of physical stuff is the leap you're making which makes your rhetorical question a strawman. If you read my post, I covered this in depth. Instead, you cherry picked a quote and took it out of context.

Actually, it would be a limit's fallacy to say a bomb breaks the shield: there is no evidence that a bomb can do that and a bomb is not some astronomical force as to force a no-limits fallacy to occur.

Prove that either of those would break it. 😐

Bam. The bane of your argument is revealed.

I am quite positive what the limit on the shield's are: strong anti-shield magic. It was shown onscreen and everything.

Asking a question isn't a strawman.

Yes, correct. Implying it can block all physical stuff regardless is the No Limits Fallacy.

I'm not making that leap of "it can also block a huge amount of physical stuff " as I didn't make that claim. I'm arguing against that claim.

Stop with the "limits fallacy" nonsense. It's just trolling.

See: No Limit's Fallacy. It stopped arrows and wizards bolts, ergo it can stop the Death Star and Superman flying into it at light+.

Bam what?

I won't argue that it can stop a great amount of magic.

So everyone who disagrees with robtard is just trolling ? The funniest part is you never once proved anything and actually demand the other side disprove your claim while you don't have to prove it. LOL.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I never once said the wizards can tank bombs. Quit putting words in my mouth. The shields clearly block physical force. You think the bombs can easily break the shields to prove it.

Shields stop physical force. You agree to this so I have proven as much as I can. Your original claim was bombs easily kill them so it's on you to prove the bombs have greater physical force than the shields can withstand.

I don't have to since you already agreed the shielding blocks physical force. You are embarrassing yourself again. Don't you tire of the self induced humiliation you put yourself through on a daily basis on here.

Stop trolling.

Stop trolling.

Stop trolling.

Fair enough you think that. Repeat: Quantify the power/force output of "hundreds of bolts". That is your claim, support it and prove 'hundreds of bolts' > bombs. Go!

Originally posted by quanchi112
So everyone who disagrees with robtard is just trolling ? The funniest part is you never once proved anything and actually demand the other side disprove your claim while you don't have to prove it. LOL.

Repeat: Quantify the power/force output of "hundreds of bolts". That is your claim, support it and prove 'hundreds of bolts' > bombs. Go!

Originally posted by Robtard
Stop trolling.

Stop trolling.

Stop trolling.

Fair enough you think that. Repeat: Quantify the power/force output of "hundreds of bolts". That is your claim, support it and prove 'hundreds of bolts' > bombs. Go!

Originally posted by quanchi112
LOL, right on cue. You made the initial claim that bombs kill the wizards. Prove the force of the bomb is greater than the shields. It's that simple. if you cannot do so rescind your claim and man up.

Repeat: Quantify the power/force output of "hundreds of bolts". That is your claim, support it and prove 'hundreds of bolts' > bombs. Go!

Originally posted by Robtard
Repeat: Quantify the power/force output of "hundreds of bolts". That is your claim, support it and prove 'hundreds of bolts' > bombs. Go!

Originally posted by quanchi112
Once again I gave my opinion AFTER YOU made the claim. You conceded.

Incorrect. You expanded on your initial claim of "shields stop bombs", now you need to support it:

Repeat: Quantify the power/force output of "hundreds of bolts". That is your claim, support it and prove 'hundreds of bolts' > bombs. Go!

Originally posted by Robtard
Incorrect. You expanded on your initial claim of "shields stop bombs", now you need to support it:

Repeat: Quantify the power/force output of "hundreds of bolts". That is your claim, support it and prove 'hundreds of bolts' > bombs. Go!

You conceded I accepted. Move on.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I gave my opinion after you made the claim of bombs easily killing them.

You conceded I accepted. Move on.

Repeat: Quantify the power/force output of "hundreds of bolts". That is your claim, support it and prove 'hundreds of bolts' > bombs. Go!

Originally posted by Robtard
Repeat: Quantify the power/force output of "hundreds of bolts". That is your claim, support it and prove 'hundreds of bolts' > bombs. Go!

Originally posted by quanchi112
That was made opinion given after you made the claim bombs easily kill. Do you not read my responses ? Sheesh.

Repeat: Quantify the power/force output of "hundreds of bolts". That is your claim, support it and prove 'hundreds of bolts' > bombs. Go!

What's the strongest physical thing the magical bolts ever broke? From there we can begjn quantifying what the mega shield (I assume that's what we're talking about here) can block hundreds of.

YouTube video
YouTube video

Don't forget, we got every wizard in the series amping this shield.

Look at that barrage at 6:12-6:22 in the second vid. You think an airstrike is going to stop that shield, when it's blocking shit like that from a few wizards and the shield in this match is being amped by every wizard in the series. Wizards pwn and airstrikes fail. The areas too big and the shield will probably work, so yeah. L.A=wizards new home.

His question was: "What's the strongest physical thing the magical bolts ever broke?"

Originally posted by Robtard
Asking a question isn't a strawman.

Originally posted by dadudemon
That's a strawman.

It can block physical stuff ergo it can block physical stuff.

Saying it can also block a huge amount of physical stuff is the leap you're making which makes your rhetorical question a strawman. If you read my post, I covered this in depth. Instead, you cherry picked a quote and took it out of context.

Originally posted by Robtard
I'm not making that leap of "it can also block a huge amount of physical stuff " as I didn't make that claim. I'm arguing against that claim.

Originally posted by dadudemon
That's a strawman.

It can block physical stuff ergo it can block physical stuff.

Saying it can also block a huge amount of physical stuff is the leap you're making which makes your rhetorical question a strawman. If you read my post, I covered this in depth. Instead, you cherry picked a quote and took it out of context.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Stop with the "limits fallacy" nonsense. It's just trolling.

No, you have it wrong: YOU stop with "no limits fallacy" trolling. Now stop whining like a baby because someone pointed out why you were wrong. Take your medicine like a man.

Originally posted by dadudemon
See: No Limit's Fallacy. It stopped arrows and wizards bolts, ergo it can stop the Death Star and Superman flying into it at light+.

Originally posted by dadudemon
That's a strawman.

It can block physical stuff ergo it can block physical stuff.

Saying it can also block a huge amount of physical stuff is the leap you're making which makes your rhetorical question a strawman. If you read my post, I covered this in depth. Instead, you cherry picked a quote and took it out of context.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Not all physical force is the same, unless you want to go on record as saying that a random thug can hit as hard as Superman.

Now, what feats do the shields have a blocking the level of physical force that would be generated by a bomb?

Limit fallacy.

What feats do the bombs have of ever destroying a magical shield of that level?

Because you guys are not getting, I'll be helpful:

Does detonating a bomb or missile (non-nukes, of course) stop the light from the sun? Of course not. That's not how it works. Two different energy systems. Sure, they can interact by you just cannot null the light coming from the sun (and don't try to pull the "in the shade" crap...that's not the point).

So what makes any of you think non-magical forces work on a magical shield that was only shown being destroyed by magical spells? Hmm? Where is your evidence? I have direct evidence that only magical spells can destroy the shields.

Originally posted by dadudemon
What feats do the bombs have of ever destroying a magical shield of that level?

You have as of yet provided no feats so that we could determine the level of the shield.

I already did. It was asked

Originally posted by Nibedicus
What's the strongest physical thing the magical bolts ever broke? From there we can begjn quantifying what the mega shield (I assume that's what we're talking about here) can block hundreds of.

I answered that in my post.