Voldemort vs. Ganondorf (Twilight Princess)

Returned.

Smites evil, the mirror never 'beat' him, it sucked him in, nothing more.

Harry had a simple charm with less resistance than what Dorf showed in the Twilight Realm.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Returned.

Smites evil, the mirror never 'beat' him, it sucked him in, nothing more.

Harry had a simple charm with less resistance than what Dorf showed in the Twilight Realm.

Both defeated and killed him.

Dorf dies. No resistance.

Returned.

The only one that even harmed him was the Master Sword.

Dorf's resistance is greater than Harry's, Harry's made it rebound.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Returned.

The only one that even harmed him was the Master Sword.

Dorf's resistance is greater than Harry's, Harry's made it rebound.

No, both harmed that one killed him.

Prove it.

Returned.

Only the sword harmed him.

Gandalf has no feats of power that compare.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Returned.

Only the sword harmed him.

Gandalf has no feats of power that compare.

Both did.

Balrog feat is greater.

Returned.

Neither harmed him.

Balrog? Balrogs in HArry Potter?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Returned.

Neither harmed him.

Balrog? Balrogs in HArry Potter?

Both did.

Lily Potter.

Never perished. HH > You.

Prove either one harmed him.

AK is easily defended against, it cannot harm Ganon.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Never perished. HH > You.

Prove either one harmed him.

AK is easily defended against, it cannot harm Ganon.

Hh proves it. Common sense proves it.

Dorf cannot defend and it kills him. Specific magic kills him.

😂

HH says straight up he did not perish. IE, you're misinterpretting the word.

He was not harmed, HH tells us so and the game shows as much.

Provide a feat for AK that would let it overcome his resistance.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
HH says straight up he did not perish. IE, you're misinterpretting the word.

He was not harmed, HH tells us so and the game shows as much.

Provide a feat for AK that would let it overcome his resistance.

😂

Resurrection.

Already done. Mirror killed him for crying out loud. 😂

Which in this context just means returned, we know he never died, lol.

Came back.

The mirror did not kill him. Prove AK can.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Which in this context just means returned, we know he never died, lol.

Came back.

The mirror did not kill him. Prove AK can.

Killed him. Hilarious.

No, it does not. Resurrection can mean simply to rise again, return to prominence, or come back into the lime-light. In this case, since he never died, it's definitely a return.

Prove AK can kill him.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
No, it does not. Resurrection can mean simply to rise again, return to prominence, or come back into the lime-light. In this case, since he never died, it's definitely a return.

Prove AK can kill him.

Already have. Mirror can.

That's funny since he was actively doing things the whole time and HH states he didn't die. Herp.

Prove it can kill him.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
That's funny since he was actively doing things the whole time and HH states he didn't die. Herp.

Prove it can kill him.

Mirror did and no specific resistance.

Stop ignoring the game and HH, he never died. The book and the game both make this clear.

The mirror did not and he resisted the Twilight Realm. Prove AK can affect him.

"Prove he was dead when the HH states "Ganondorf was sent to the Twilight realm", "Exiled by the Mirror of Twilight", "the sages used the Mirror of Twilight to banish Ganondorf to the Twilight realm", "..sent to the Twilight realm..", "Ganondorf ’s banishment to the Twilight Realm" :T ?"

Originally posted by quanchi112
He was cause of it. Wouldn't faze him.

Specific repelling works. Specific mirrors works. Specific Ak works.

Only against force attacks but no limits fallacy. Oneshotted.

"Stated numerous times that the MS is anti-evil sacred magic, stated half as many times that Ganondorf gets defeated by anti-evil sacred magic."
^Sorry I couldn't hear you over this line negating your point.

Quan, do you even know what 'specific' means? You've said before that all specific magic isnt the same.. because its 'specific', meaning that if Ganondorf is affected by a 'specific' magic, then that 'specific' magic is able to affect him. But you knew this for saying that specific magic isnt the same as others, right? 🙂 If BFR works, than BFR works. If soul afflicting magic does not work, than soul magic does not work. But I'm sure you'll backtrack on this, just like when stating that only magic resistance is needed til it was proven.

Oh, and prove it.