Originally posted by quanchi112
Allowing someone else to kill him means the wand would belong to Snape. The wand doesn't care if you intentionally lose but if you lose the wand goes to the person who beats you. He still willingly lost to Draco as in disarmed. The wand belonged to him whether he fought back or not. It's like when you thought she used the super nova attack. You're a child.The wand resisted him because he wasn't the rightful owner. Harry was the rightful owner. Voldemort also didn't try to snap it in half. You're simple.
Dorf was killed by a teenager in combat.
😂 😂
Voldemort was never the rightful ruler of his wand and already had previously defeated Harry. Dorf just lost multiple times to a teenager with a few weeks experience unlike Harry who had years of training. You're an awful debater.
You need to prove it doesn't work. Spell works so if you believe it doesn't work prove it. Debating 101.
10 percent superior and I already explained why he did. If you can't grasp the answers don't ask the questions.
Dorf lost to a teenager in fair combat with a few weeks training.
😂
It wouldn't, because Snape didn't actually best him and take the wand against his will. He was just doing what Dumbledore wanted him to do. That's how this works in Potterlore. The wand already had a bloody history, Dumbledore didn't want it falling in the wrong hands all over again. That was one of the main points of him plotting his death at Snape's hands, you buffoon. He didn't "willingly" lose to Draco, you twit, Draco disarming him was out of the blue. He basically caught Dumbledore off-guard, and the wand was removed against his will, which is why it shifted its allegiance to Malfoy. You don't even have the first clue about how the HPverse functions.
The wand was broken by a teenage half-wit. The very same wand which Voldy failed to subjugate to his will. Awful showing.
That same teenager sh1ts all over Harry Potter and his piss-poor feats. That same teen would pretty much solo Voldy on his lonesome.
No, I don't need to prove a negative. Debating201. A step-up from the imaginary third grade course that you took part in.
You mean to say the time when you conceded that Ganon was an inherently more powerful character than Russell? Is that what you're talking about, since Digi too believes that Dorf is far above Russell in terms of raw power.
Ganondorf, the herald-level threat, demolishes the fail meta-level dark lord from a weaksauce universe of dimwitted teenagers. 👆
