Battlezone challenge to Zelda fans

Started by quanchi11274 pages

Originally posted by ScreamPaste

I will, and we'll send all of our leftovers to your ex wife.
I was never married. Geez lying already, dominatrix.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I was never married. Geez lying already, dominatrix.

Quan never married!? GASP! Guess I was too generous to assume you'd ever had a woman in your life.

That's why you belittle the women in mine?

Question.
Without the second rule for this BZ, would Hyrule win without debate?

Hyrule loses the Triforce, 4 light spirits, 3 gods and 3 characters abilities to drop Twilight.. compared to HP only losing the Avada Kedava from 9+ people.

Originally posted by BloodRain
Question.
Without the second rule for this BZ, would Hyrule win without debate?

Hyrule loses the Triforce, 4 light spirits, 3 gods and 3 characters abilities to drop Twilight.. compared to HP only losing the Avada Kedava from 9+ people.

No, I still see Potterverse stomping but I don't want the entire debate to be centered around mega attacks which defeats the whole purpose of the debate in the first place.

I also think many wizards can use the killing curse(deatheaters of course) because we see a very unskilled wizard doing so. You use have to mean it. I wouldn't argue for Harry or his friends to do so as it's out of character.

The Potterverse loses Death as well and the three brothers. Most of these spirits/Death are inarguable anyways in terms of battle purposes.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste

Quan never married!? GASP! Guess I was too generous to assume you'd ever had a woman in your life.

That's why you belittle the women in mine?

Women yes but marriage no. That's a trap.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I also think many wizards can use the killing curse(deatheaters of course) because we see a very unskilled wizard doing so. You use have to mean it. I wouldn't argue for Harry or his friends to do so as it's out of character.

Who's the unskilled wizard that used it? Iirc it was the torture curse that needed to be "meant".

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, I still see Potterverse stomping but I don't want the entire debate to be centered around mega attacks which defeats the whole purpose of the debate in the first place.

I also think many wizards can use the killing curse(deatheaters of course) because we see a very unskilled wizard doing so. You use have to mean it. I wouldn't argue for Harry or his friends to do so as it's out of character.

The Potterverse loses Death as well and the three brothers. Most of these spirits/Death are inarguable anyways in terms of battle purposes.

Lord Voldemort
Bellatrix Lestrange
Bartemius Crouch Jr.
Peter Pettigrew
Thorfinn Rowle
Vincent Crabbe
Gregory Goyle
Amycus Carrow

The only 8 characters that have ever thrown them around. Snape and Draco have the spell but aren't the type to use it just like that. No one else has shown the willingness or skill to use it.

The Resurrection Stone only brings back intangible people that are only seen by the user. And besides Death having nothing to him (isn't able to attack people), according to Dumbledore that story was probably a fairy tale.

And thats what I'm getting at; HP is only losing AK's from 8+ people. LoZ loses 4 beings with powerful light magic, 3 goddly deities, 3 mass AoE soul attacks that could one-shot anyone without some kind of soul resistance, and the goddess' powered wishes from the Triforce.
Thats why I was asking if without these one-sided limits and no 'for the sake of debate', would these just wipe out the HP side from the get go?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Women yes but marriage no. That's a trap.

That's kind of the point, keeps them around longer, I guess they knew better in advance, though?

Originally posted by BloodRain
Lord Voldemort
Bellatrix Lestrange
Bartemius Crouch Jr.
Peter Pettigrew
Thorfinn Rowle
Vincent Crabbe
Gregory Goyle
Amycus Carrow

The only 8 characters that have ever thrown them around. Snape and Draco have the spell but aren't the type to use it just like that. No one else has shown the willingness or skill to use it.

The Resurrection Stone only brings back intangible people that are only seen by the user. And besides Death having nothing to him (isn't able to attack people), according to Dumbledore that story was probably a fairy tale.

And thats what I'm getting at; HP is only losing AK's from 8+ people. LoZ loses 4 beings with powerful light magic, 3 goddly deities, 3 mass AoE soul attacks that could one-shot anyone without some kind of soul resistance, and the goddess' powered wishes from the Triforce.
Thats why I was asking if without these one-sided limits and no 'for the sake of debate', would these just wipe out the HP side from the get go?

They would but good luck ever getting Quan to admit as much.

...was meant to post this in the other thread *ahem*

And I dunno. The isn't much of anything to dispute the three guys dropping Twilight on the school.

Originally posted by juggerman
Who's the unskilled wizard that used it? Iirc it was the torture curse that needed to be "meant".
Yes, it was the torture curse which failed but I feel like the same logic applies to the avada kedavra.

Gregory Goyle.

Originally posted by BloodRain
Lord Voldemort
Bellatrix Lestrange
Bartemius Crouch Jr.
Peter Pettigrew
Thorfinn Rowle
Vincent Crabbe
Gregory Goyle
Amycus Carrow

The only 8 characters that have ever thrown them around. Snape and Draco have the spell but aren't the type to use it just like that. No one else has shown the willingness or skill to use it.

The Resurrection Stone only brings back intangible people that are only seen by the user. And besides Death having nothing to him (isn't able to attack people), according to Dumbledore that story was probably a fairy tale.

And thats what I'm getting at; HP is only losing AK's from 8+ people. LoZ loses 4 beings with powerful light magic, 3 goddly deities, 3 mass AoE soul attacks that could one-shot anyone without some kind of soul resistance, and the goddess' powered wishes from the Triforce.
Thats why I was asking if without these one-sided limits and no 'for the sake of debate', would these just wipe out the HP side from the get go?

I can't get into why this isn't the case now. You will have to sit back and watch the debate. One of my battlezone angles has always been to keep the best in store and to catch someone completely off guard.

I won't be arguing for massive avada kedavras anyways. But that's besides the point it's obvious other deatheaters would do so or did off screen if Gregory Doyle hurls one on screen. Lucius Malfoy was also in the process of one before Dobby intervened as well.

After my battlezone you will see where I am going with this. The reason I want to eliminate these sort of things/tactics is it takes away the focus from an invasion type thread to mega attacks which isn't any fun.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste

That's kind of the point, keeps them around longer, I guess they knew better in advance, though?
They would but good luck ever getting Quan to admit as much.
Why keep a companion around longer than 5 years. Passion always dies sooner or later and the only girls you want are the ones you aren't routinely sleeping with.

Originally posted by BloodRain
...was meant to post this in the other thread *ahem*

And I dunno. The isn't much of anything to dispute the three guys dropping Twilight on the school.

Wholeheartedly disagree. But alas this isn't the time or the place to hear my reasoning when a battlezone will take place in less than a month.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Why keep a companion around longer than 5 years. Passion always dies sooner or later and the only girls you want are the ones you aren't routinely sleeping with.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I am not the one who gets attached to women.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am not the one who gets attached to women.

So, you're a homosexual?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
So, you're a homosexual?
Not at all. I just simply don't get attached like you do. I bet you loved the movie the Notebook.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Not at all. I just simply don't get attached like you do. I bet you loved the movie the Notebook.

Weird, you're being awfully monogamous with me. 131 No eyes for the ladies, huh Quan?

What? Never seen it.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Weird, you're being awfully monogamous with me. 131 No eyes for the ladies, huh Quan?

What? Never seen it.

You're a very weird dominatrix.

Dom*

And I already told you my title is for valued subs only, I prefer your usual, easily ignored insults. 131