Battlezone challenge to Zelda fans

Started by quanchi11274 pages

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
So, if it's not butthurt, why do you keep replying to me? You backed down, and you apparently have no interest. You're just here for ponies, then?

Are the colourful equines stirring odd feels in you, Quan?

No, I asked you to accept the challenge. You didn't. I then walked into the video game versus and called zelda fans out. Xanatos stepped up to the plate.

Originally posted by BloodRain
If we say that more characters can use the AK, where do you stop? May as well assume that tons of others can use it, or assume that every wizard at or above Goyles level can use it, like every adult.

How will it? In the BZ you wont be debating against the Triforce or dropping Twilight, Xan wont be able to throw these points your way, so no explanation you give for these will give anything away as this topic will not be brought up.

It's the same sort of weird illogical stance if we have never seen Superman cook a steak we can't assume he can. If someone on Goyle's level can cast the killing curse then we have to assume the deatheaters can do so. Is it a guesstimation; absolutely. But to argue that only 8 people can do so is ridiculous.

It all all make sense at the end of the day. Just hold your questions until after the battlezone.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It's the same sort of weird illogical stance if we have never seen Superman cook a steak we can't assume he can. If someone on Goyle's level can cast the killing curse then we have to assume the deatheaters can do so. Is it a guesstimation; absolutely. But to argue that only 8 people can do so is ridiculous.

It all all make sense at the end of the day. Just hold your questions until after the battlezone.

So Quan accepts that HP wizards can cast spells, but doesn't accept that people with super strength can cut people in half. haermm

Here you go, Quan. A domme pony, just for you and your awkward fantasies. 131

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
So Quan accepts that HP wizards can cast spells, but doesn't accept that people with super strength can cut people in half. haermm

Here you go, Quan. A domme pony, just for you and your awkward fantasies. 131

Lifting strength not ripping bodies in half strength. There is a huge difference. Sit back and be quiet, domme.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Lifting strength not ripping bodies in half strength. There is a huge difference. Sit back and be quiet, domme.

So you like dominant Rainbow Dash?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Lifting strength not ripping bodies in half strength. There is a huge difference. Sit back and be quiet, domme.
What is the difference?

Originally posted by NemeBro
What is the difference?
Link shows one and not the other. Did you really have to ask me that ?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste

So you like dominant Rainbow Dash?
Not at all. I can tell you do though, sickee.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It's the same sort of weird illogical stance if we have never seen Superman cook a steak we can't assume he can. If someone on Goyle's level can cast the killing curse then we have to assume the deatheaters can do so. Is it a guesstimation; absolutely. But to argue that only 8 people can do so is ridiculous.

It all all make sense at the end of the day. Just hold your questions until after the battlezone.


Cooking a steak is burning some meat. Using the killing curse is a learnt technique requiring a proper intent to kill. Can more than 8 wizards use AK? Obviously. But assuming anyone practising the Dark Arts on Goyle's level can do it?

It.. doesn't though. You stating a way for HP to defend against Twilight or the Trifoce won't give Xan the advantage, nor will it show your hand as these topics won't be discussed at all in the BZ.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Not at all. I can tell you do though, sickee.
I prefer her in a collar.

Originally posted by BloodRain
Cooking a steak is burning some meat. Using the killing curse is a learnt technique requiring a proper intent to kill. Can more than 8 wizards use AK? Obviously. But assuming anyone practising the Dark Arts on Goyle's level can do it?

It.. doesn't though. You stating a way for HP to defend against Twilight or the Trifoce won't give Xan the advantage, nor will it show your hand as these topics won't be discussed at all in the BZ.


Quan avoiding having to admit a conclusion he doesn't like? No one is surprised, BR. 😛

I want my answer >:[

Originally posted by BloodRain
Cooking a steak is burning some meat. Using the killing curse is a learnt technique requiring a proper intent to kill. Can more than 8 wizards use AK? Obviously. But assuming anyone practising the Dark Arts on Goyle's level can do it?

It.. doesn't though. You stating a way for HP to defend against Twilight or the Trifoce won't give Xan the advantage, nor will it show your hand as these topics won't be discussed at all in the BZ.

Sure Superman can burn some meat but does he know how to grill a steak. I am sure he does but I don't require proof to do so and this is to the extent of what you are saying for the avada kedavra. We don't always get proof of everything that's when common sense and logic step in.

Goyle wasn't a skilled wizard so assuming adult deatheaters that were in Voldemort's army weren't able to do so is just silly. The funny thing is I wouldn't be arguing for massive avada kedavra's anyways. For one thing they aren't needed. I am not assuming anyone can do it but those above Goyle's skill level who are truly evil wizards most assuredly can do so.

I will not answer this. Wait until after the thread.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I prefer her in a collar.

Quan avoiding having to admit a conclusion he doesn't like? No one is surprised, BR. 😛

You are quite disturbed. I won't debate any tactics in terms of HP characters against Zelda characters until after my battlezone. Sit back and wait.

We don't always get proof of everything that's when common sense and logic step in.

Two things you don't seem to have. You've argued in circles about whether a character with a sword and super strength can bisect an enemy, and despite banning obvious instant wins in TP v.s. HP, are trying to maintain that the Potterverse could actually win with those things included, and yet refuse to elaborate on how, because they will somehow be addressed in the BZ, even though you outright banned them. haermm

Circles, circles everywhere.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Sure Superman can burn some meat but does he know how to grill a steak. I am sure he does but I don't require proof to do so and this is to the extent of what you are saying for the avada kedavra. We don't always get proof of everything that's when common sense and logic step in.

Goyle wasn't a skilled wizard so assuming adult deatheaters that were in Voldemort's army weren't able to do so is just silly. The funny thing is I wouldn't be arguing for massive avada kedavra's anyways. For one thing they aren't needed. I am not assuming anyone can do it but those above Goyle's skill level who are truly evil wizards most assuredly can do so.

I will not answer this. Wait until after the thread.

Except that grilling is a simple act requiring little skill or knowledge. AK is a powerful spell (as shown spells aren't picked up right away) and takes a specific mentality to even use it. We don't know which characters are in that mentality or even who has learnt the to use the move.

If you could show a Death Eaters mentality then you could assume they could use it. Just a little hard to see what they're thinking.

Why not? We both know nothing said about this will impact the BZ.

Originally posted by BloodRain
Except that grilling is a simple act requiring little skill or knowledge. AK is a powerful spell (as shown spells aren't picked up right away) and takes a specific mentality to even use it. We don't know which characters are in that mentality or even who has learnt the to use the move.

If you could show a Death Eaters mentality then you could assume they could use it. Just a little hard to see what they're thinking.

Why not? We both know nothing said about this will impact the BZ.

So wait a minute you are telling me that Goyle displayed more ruthlessness than the majority of the deatheaters storming Hogwarts castle ? You are becoming rather absurd. There is a reason the Ministry of defense was overthrown. It wasn't due to ko spells and what not. These were dark men led by Voldemort. The only reason others didn't sack/kill Potter is because they were all afraid of Voldemort and he made it quite clear he was the only one to kill Potter.

We also see fenrir kill Ron's former gf iirc. People were dying and being killed off screen and to suggest the bulk of the majority of Voldemort's army were not skilled enough as Gregory Goyle is just ridiculous. That's the only way to point it.

We see dead bodies left and right. We see people killed and attacked in the sky taking Potter to their safe location. These guys were out to kill make no mistake about it. Your whole we don't see it is ridiculous.

My opinion won't change and do not ask again.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Two things you don't seem to have. You've argued in circles about whether a character with a sword and super strength can bisect an enemy, and despite banning obvious instant wins in TP v.s. HP, are trying to maintain that the Potterverse could actually win with those things included, and yet refuse to elaborate on how, because they will somehow be addressed in the BZ, even though you outright banned them. haermm

Circles, circles everywhere.

This will all be covered in due time. You will understand how this is after the battlezone. If not feel free to ask me then. I also think Link can kill someone with a sword because there are many examples of him doing so but ripping someone's head off is fanboyism as there are no examples of him doing so.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So wait a minute you are telling me that Goyle displayed more ruthlessness than the majority of the deatheaters storming Hogwarts castle ? You are becoming rather absurd. There is a reason the Ministry of defense was overthrown. It wasn't due to ko spells and what not. These were dark men led by Voldemort. The only reason others didn't sack/kill Potter is because they were all afraid of Voldemort and he made it quite clear he was the only one to kill Potter.

We also see fenrir kill Ron's former gf iirc. People were dying and being killed off screen and to suggest the bulk of the majority of Voldemort's army were not skilled enough as Gregory Goyle is just ridiculous. That's the only way to point it.

We see dead bodies left and right. We see people killed and attacked in the sky taking Potter to their safe location. These guys were out to kill make no mistake about it. Your whole we don't see it is ridiculous.

My opinion won't change and do not ask again.

Its simple, 'If you could show a Death Eaters mentality..' and if you can confirm the particular person is a practitioner of the 3 spells then you'd have a leg to stand on that isn't only an assumption.
Cause I know if there was a vs thread using a single random Death Eater, no one would be saying this random will use AK.

Harry or Hermione in a fit of rage knocks a guy though a window, which assuming the didnt think the guy would somehow get away from hitting the ground, it was a killing attack. Or Neville killing the Snake. Several good guys are killing, and they know about AK.. are we to assume they're fit to use AK?

So you don't mind if I take that as your concession until you speak up on the matter?

Originally posted by quanchi112
This will all be covered in due time. You will understand how this is after the battlezone. If not feel free to ask me then. I also think Link can kill someone with a sword because there are many examples of him doing so but ripping someone's head off is fanboyism as there are no examples of him doing so.

So Link is class 100, but if his sword hits someone in the neck, their head doesn't come off? haermm

Originally posted by BloodRain
Its simple, 'If you could show a Death Eaters mentality..' and if you can confirm the particular person is a practitioner of the 3 spells then you'd have a leg to stand on that isn't only an assumption.
Cause I know if there was a vs thread using a single random Death Eater, no one would be saying this random will use AK.

Harry or Hermione in a fit of rage knocks a guy though a window, which assuming the didnt think the guy would somehow get away from hitting the ground, it was a killing attack. Or Neville killing the Snake. Several good guys are killing, and they know about AK.. are we to assume they're fit to use AK?

So you don't mind if I take that as your concession until you speak up on the matter?

We see people die and are shown the bodies afterwards. We see someone far less skilled shoot the avada kedavra along with other wizards doing so in the films. We don't need to see it to draw a conclusion based off of common sense with all the information we do know.

We are to assume the deatheaters who work for Voldemort are skilled enough to do so. I would never argue someone on Harry's side would do so but the other side of course. We see Goyle do so. The kid had the skill to let loose fiendfyre but lack the skill to control it.

What I claim makes sense given the information we do know. I won't even be arguing for these massive avada kedavra tactics anyways.