Battlezone challenge to Zelda fans

Originally posted by quanchi112
My ass. the guy didn't oneshot Hyrule. The guy was cocky and got his ass kicked. Some lucky divine prank happened and the dumbass still lost. Some 17 year old kid comes out of nowhere to crush Dorf. LOL. He's pathetic.

Counter the Twilight Field, go ahead and try. It one shots every wizard in the Potterverse, none of them have any defense.

Counter the triforce, a single wish and every wizard in the HPverse is a fish.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Actually that 'trick' was just him succeeding in the child timeline.

Counter the Twilight Field, go ahead and try. It one shots every wizard in the Potterverse, none of them have any defense.

Counter the triforce, a single wish and every wizard in the HPverse is a fish.

You just argue like a fanboy. This guy solos armies (despite never doing so) that guy beheads everything (despite never doing so). You are like a harmless kid. No one takes ou seriously least of all yourself.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Haha. Did the twili field solo hyrule ? 😂

You just argue like a fanboy. This guy solos armies (despite never doing so) that guy beheads everything (despite never doing so). You are like a harmless kid. No one takes ou seriously least of all yourself.

Ganondorf did solo Hyrule, and has several times. He gave Zant the fraction of his power that allowed Zant to do what he did, he created the monsters, broke the mirror and called down Twilight.

Arguing a character with super strength and a sword can't behead someone is also hilarious, never change Quan. Do however try to counter the Twilight field. Go ahead, try. (You can't.)

I'll accept your concession if you're unwilling to put forward any feasible way for HPverse to cope with it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Unlike you I get the portrayal of the films. Only a fool would say only these people can use the spell. It's as ridiculous as saying Superman can't grill a steak since we haven't seen him do so. Yes, but the good guys aren't as ruthless as the bad guys and only when forced to kill do they do so. That's the big difference.
I limited the Harry Potter characters far more than the Zelda characters. It's not even close.
I said everyone whose skill level and aggression matches or exceeds Goyle. You can continue to put words in my mouth and simply cry for Zelda. I could care less. I just find your obsession irritating when you had the chance to actually test my resolve. You didn't accept and like paste come charging in after the fact.

"compared to HP only losing the Avada Kedava from 9+ people." Literally all I said about AK. You said many others and 'deatheaters of course' could use it, so I explained where the number came from. A tangent point you chose to discuss, if ya didn't care you would be arguing this unneeded point.

Just answer my actual post about this; What massive game changers did you limit from the HP side? Because the 3 things you mentioned (time turner, resurrection stone, Death) are useless here.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am saying these supposed attacks which can destroy entire worlds and solo is ridiculous. It soloed Hyrule which let's face it is one of the weakest militaries or fighting units I have even seen in fiction.
You will find out after it starts. I told you to drop it but you are annoying and persistent as ever. I am not going to be nice since you keep asking the same question i told you I wouldn't directly answer at this point.
I already explained that if I left them in that the zelda debater would basically be arguing for that and that's what the debate would have disintegrated to. Keep asking the same questions though. I will just increase my post count.

If youre so adamant about avoiding this topic, just answer with a 'Yes they can' and I'll expect the proper answer at a later point;
Can the HP side defend themselves from a massive soul attack that can cover all of Hogwarts, one which victims aren't even aware of?
Can the HP side defend themselves from the effects of the Triforce wishes, like the wish potency to cover Hyrule with an ocean?

Originally posted by quanchi112
You earned this by repeating the same questions I asked you to stop asking.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Link shows one and not the other. Did you really have to ask me that ?

You didn't explain the difference between them. This is a red herring.

Originally posted by NemeBro
You didn't explain the difference between them. This is a red herring.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Forum laughing stock trying to say no one takes me seriously.

Ganondorf did solo Hyrule, and has several times. He gave Zant the fraction of his power that allowed Zant to do what he did, he created the monsters, broke the mirror and called down Twilight.

Arguing a character with super strength and a sword can't behead someone is also hilarious, never change Quan. Do however try to counter the Twilight field. Go ahead, try. (You can't.)

I'll accept your concession if you're unwilling to put forward any feasible way for HPverse to cope with it.

No, he didn't. We see him bfr'd into humiliating defeat. Zant, his power, and an army defeated Hyrule minus Link. Soloing means one person is involved. You are too stupid to even know what the word solo means.

Arguing for never before seen feats is fanboyish. Please change, kiddo.

Not going to answer this now.

You can pretend whatever you want, dumb guy.

Originally posted by quanchi112
If I can lift 400 pounds does that mean I can physically rip a 45 pound barbell in half with my strength ?

If you can lift, say, 100 tons, like Link, then you can rip a barbell in half.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You're the forum coward.

No, he didn't. We see him bfr'd into humiliating defeat. Zant, his power, and an army defeated Hyrule minus Link. Soloing means one person is involved. You are too stupid to even know what the word solo means.

Arguing for never before seen feats is fanboyish. Please change, kiddo.

Not going to answer this now.

You can pretend whatever you want, dumb guy.

Right, an army he created, Zant with a fraction of his own power, ect. This was all Ganondorf's doing.

So you have nothing, then, and banned them because they would oneshot the entire Potterverse. Concession accepted.

Originally posted by BloodRain
So the 'what would the director say' was pointless? Bad comparison.. any human can attempt to grill, while AK's a learnt move requiring a state of mind, will and nature.
"Only a fool would say only these people can use the spell." I've stated my view on this is to be "Can more than 8 wizards use AK? Obviously." How many times do I has to say this? More can use it but it cant be said in a debate as we have no idea who or how many. Hence the '+' indicating more.

"compared to HP only losing the Avada Kedava from 9+ people." Literally all I said about AK. You said many others and 'deatheaters of course' could use it, so I explained where the number came from. A tangent point you chose to discuss, if ya didn't care you would be arguing this unneeded point.[/B]

Just answer my actual post about this; What massive game changers did you limit from the HP side? Because the 3 things you mentioned (time turner, resurrection stone, Death) are useless here.[/B]

The large soul attacking AoF Twilight field =/= Hyrules military power. It's a BZ where the Twilight field and Triforce wishes are banned per your rule.. they won't be brought up at all, nor will any countermeasures for it. Nothing you say about this can be used by Xan in any way as he can't bring it up.[/B]

If youre so adamant about avoiding this topic, just answer with a 'Yes they can' and I'll expect the proper answer at a later point;
Can the HP side defend themselves from a massive soul attack that can cover all of Hogwarts, one which victims aren't even aware of?
Can the HP side defend themselves from the effects of the Triforce wishes, like the wish potency to cover Hyrule with an ocean?

You would insult all the people that go to VG-Vs because I asked you a question? Like I said, lets avoid the name calling and hair pulling. We don't need to bash members to debate. Also why do you keep mentioning post counts to me? Its like the third time now 😕 [/B]

Relax. Your obsessive posts needed to be addressed. Now drop these twilight field questions as I am not answering.

Originally posted by quanchi112
If I can lift 400 pounds does that mean I can physically rip a 45 pound barbell in half with my strength ?

No, but you could rip apart a 45lb barbell in half if you could lift 70 tons or so.

Don't care. Not saying anything on the matter.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
By not "weighing in" you are not objecting and therefore concede that vampire <pony. Complacency is annoying like that.

Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
No, but you could rip apart a 45lb barbell in half if you could lift 70 tons or so.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste

Originally posted by quanchi112
If I can lift 400 pounds does that mean I can physically rip a 45 pound barbell in half with my strength ?

Red herring again.

Originally posted by quanchi112
That's not true at all. I don't have an opinion on the matter. That's also another topic I have no interest on so once again I am going to walk the walk here.

Also, LOL @ "I refuse to talk about this, but I'm the one walking the walk here" haermm Dat irony.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Some humans might not have the knowledge to grill. We see wizards killing left and right and yet you assume Goyle can do so but an experienced death eater can't. It's stupid to even say such a thing. I never said I'd be even debating massive avada kedavra anyways. You just want to feel important or something.
You brought it up and I laughed about it. It's absurd. You can continue to be absurd.

When a character out-muscles a 10 tonner we don't say exactly how strong they are, we generalize and say they're a 10+ tonner.

We know they're above a certain number, but to an unknown level so you can only argue '+'. Just like this, we know more people can use AK but to an unknown amount, so its just '+'

So you admit that you're the one that made this into a topic when it was a small tangent to my real question? Don't start things then complain that they're happening.

Originally posted by quanchi112
They are not useless. Time traveling to gain access to key information about who will be where at what time is not useless information. You could have the entire Harry Potter universe aiding each other. We also see Harry Potter save himself from the dementors. Acting like this wouldn't be a huge advantage is very ignorant. Not say that I am surprised though.

Throwing the snails, almost getting caught, Dumbledoor distracting the two, howling, saving himself. All things that are set events of this single time-line, effecting the individual as they jump back on this line. Novikov self-consistency principle, the Time Turner is even listed as an example.

As said, like the other two its nothing something they can use here.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Don't care. Not saying anything on the matter.
Not going to answer this now.
Relax. Your obsessive posts needed to be addressed. Now drop these twilight field questions as I am not answering.

I don't have an opinion on the matter. That's also another topic I have no interest on so once again I am going to walk the walk here.

And ya can't say you have no interest in this if its about two verses you're pitting against each other, after stripping them of these moves for the specific reason that they can solo.

Until someone gives an answer to HP vs Twilight/Triforce there is absolutely nothing to argue against this, so until then these two can solo HP. I assume you're fine with this for the time being?

Originally posted by NemeBro
No but if you could lift 2,000 pounds you could.

Red herring again.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Actually, it is true. If you refuse to defend the point you concede by default. IE, RD > Edgintong and Twilight field > HPverse.

Also, LOL @ "I refuse to talk about this, but I'm the one walking the walk here" haermm Dat irony.

I am the one doing the battlezone this thursday. You will be the guy posting pony pics.

Originally posted by BloodRain
When a character blitzes a Hypersonic character we don't say exactly how fast they is, we generalize and say they're Hypersonic+

When a character out-muscles a 10 tonner we don't say exactly how strong they are, we generalize and say they're a 10+ tonner.

We know they're above a certain number, but to an unknown level so you can only argue '+'. Just like this, we know more people can use AK but to an unknown amount, so its just '+'

So you admit that you're the one that made this into a topic when it was a small tangent to my real question? Don't start things then complain that they're happening.[/B]

"HP actually cant do jack by time travelling as it works on a singular timeline, they follow the "Nothing can be changed because anything a traveller does merely produces the circumstances they had noted before travelling" rule. Its the reason why Harry saved himself before using the Time Turner. So they couldnt go back to and wreck havoc as the LoZ are standing right there, un-wrecked."[/B]

Throwing the snails, almost getting caught, Dumbledoor distracting the two, howling, saving himself. All things that are set events of this single time-line, effecting the individual as they jump back on this line. Novikov self-consistency principle, the Time Turner is even listed as an example.

As said, like the other two its nothing something they can use here.[/B]

Can't even give a simple Yes/No? That says more than enough.

And ya can't say you have no interest in this if its about two verses you're pitting against each other, after stripping them of these moves for the specific reason that they can solo.

Until someone gives an answer to HP vs Twilight/Triforce there is absolutely nothing to argue against this, so until then these two can solo HP. I assume you're fine with this for the time being? [/B]

You are free to believe whatever stupid theory you want to. I don't believe it and i won't answer it until after the battlezone. Pretty crystal clear response. Keep responding begging for my attention though. It's cute.

Originally posted by quanchi112
That wasn't the question. When did Link rip apart a barbell ?

I answered that question: no. Never, to my knowledge.