Originally posted by quanchi112
He was attacking just because the dragon kills him we don't pretend Zan wasn't attacking. Your brain is truly unique.This thread is in response to the McClane thread. I know its silly of me to expect you to follow along with all of this but I'm really trying to give you the eye fit of the doubt.
Rob--guy jumps with axe at a dragon.
Robs assessment--he was trying to kiss him. The axe was just foreplay.
Zan wins.
And now the flips. Your claim was that he "swung the axe", when you're faced with the facts that he didn't and that your whole premise was wrong. Flip, flip, flip.
More "McClane!" "McClane" "McClane" as a means to to and divert and dodge what you have no answer to. McClane's not in this thread, stop obsessing over him, or in the very least go make another one of your ridiculous gimped matches where you kill a character you don't like, McClane this time 🙂
Sure, keep ignoring the entire context of the scene and the build up of the character and his action throughout the movie that lead up to that scene and just go with your "he jumped at the dragon cos he's a badass" claims.
And another strawman argument cos you can't address my actual argument. Nothing new.
Van Zan wins via shown feats. Being irrational and jumping into certain death.