The Eastern Orthodox church came from the 2nd line, the Roman Catholic line. They have pretty much the same structure (religious hierarchy with a pope-like "patriarch"😉 and same doctrines (pray to saints, "venerate" [meaning reverence/worship] Mary, works-based salvation, bowing to icons/statues/pictures, etc.). They (EO and RC) only split after 1054. Before that, they were in lock-step together.
And there HAD to be a separate line of Christians (whether they were "Baptist" or not is not my concern. I try not to put a denominational label on born again, Bible-believing Christianity. I decided to use that label because the unregistered Baptist movement is as close to Biblical Christianity as a denomination will get, imo) because the Catholic church persecuted, tortured and killed Christians who had a different doctrine during the Inquisitions and the Dark Ages. These Christians came from a separate line.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
But I did tell you time and again that I wasn't interested in the differences of opinion in your religion.
...Which has nothing to do with "not being able to take what I dish out." I didn't blatantly disrespect you, I replied to your posts with documented fact and you ignored it, likening it to complete gibberish. Now whether you want to read it or not is up to you, but to make a joke out of it is rude and disrespectful, imo.
If you can prove what I'm saying wrong, I WILL admit I'm wrong. But until you BIBLICALLY prove to me that what I'm saying is wrong, then I won't.
But, like I said, I can't make you read what I post.