Imhotep (Mummy) vs. Midna (Fused Shadows) TP

Started by ScreamPaste22 pages

We see it happen on screen. Emotep can't compare.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
We see it happen on screen. Emotep can't compare.
Prove it.

We see it happen on screen. Emotep can't compare.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
We see it happen on screen. Emotep can't compare.
No, we don't as time passes. Imhotep wins.

Those scenes occur in simultaneity, Link and Zelda pick up from when they were teleported. Herp derp.

Emotep hasn't got the feats to compete. Provide a feat or concede.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, I am saying things don't add up in fiction like you want them to. Gameplay mechanic.
We don't know what happened so its all speculation.
Except that you haven't and cannot negate the fact that Twilight beasts can resist bombs, or that Fused Shadow beasts only taking sword damage from a weak point. Nothing to suggest that sand is on the level of bombs. Therefore nothing to say that his sand can affect Midna or remove her Fused Shadows.

AKA you have nothing to dispute the scene? Nothing at all? A bit disappointing.

What we know;
>Midna was in the Castle
>Midna attacked Ganondorf
>The castle exploded
>Midna lost

The only 'speculation' is whether the explosion or Ganondorf knocked her out. Thats it. You can speculate that something else happened all you like, wont make it true~

Originally posted by quanchi112, name changing edit by BloodRain
Magic can defeat Imhotep. (Midna) uses magic therefore what is the logical conclusion ?
Can quite literally keep posting your own words here.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Those scenes occur in simultaneity, Link and Zelda pick up from when they were teleported. Herp derp.

Emotep hasn't got the feats to compete. Provide a feat or concede.

Prove it. Speculation.

Originally posted by BloodRain
Except that you haven't and cannot negate the fact that Twilight beasts can resist bombs, or that Fused Shadow beasts only taking sword damage from a weak point. Nothing to suggest that sand is on the level of bombs. Therefore nothing to say that his sand can affect Midna or remove her Fused Shadows.

AKA you have nothing to dispute the scene? Nothing at all? A bit disappointing.

What we know;
>Midna was in the Castle
>Midna attacked Ganondorf
>The castle exploded
>Midna lost

The only 'speculation' is whether the explosion or Ganondorf knocked her out. Thats it. You can speculate that something else happened all you like, wont make it true~

Can quite literally keep posting your own words here.

Different forms of attack. Quit picking and choosing. Sand kills Midna. She isn't a twilight beast.

Speculation. 😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Different forms of attack. Quit picking and choosing. Sand kills Midna. She isn't a twilight beast.

Speculation.

Are you saying that resisting bombs doesn't mean someone can resist sand? haermm

No she's above normal Twilight creatures, and in her FS form she's above other FS beasts as shes composed of four instead of one. You did play the game, right? Seems you've missed 2/3rd of whats going on

Exactly, you're just guessing at what may have happened. Feels good to admit it, da? 🙂

Originally posted by BloodRain
Originally posted by quanchi112, name changing edit by BloodRain
Magic can defeat Imhotep. (Midna) uses magic therefore what is the logical conclusion ?
Can quite literally keep posting your own words here.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Prove it. Speculation.
It's right there in the scene.

Oh and thanks for failing to provide a worthwhile feat for Emotep while you were at it. You lose again. 🙂

Originally posted by BloodRain
Are you saying that resisting bombs doesn't mean someone can resist sand? haermm

No she's above normal Twilight creatures, and in her FS form she's above other FS beasts as shes composed of four instead of one. You did play the game, right? Seems you've missed 2/3rd of whats going on

Exactly, you're just guessing at what may have happened. Feels good to admit it, da? 🙂

Can quite literally keep posting your own words here.

[/B][/QUOTE] Different method is attack. One is pure force other isn't.

Abc logic. Dfferent abilities. Etc.

Speculation either way.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
It's right there in the scene.

Oh and thanks for failing to provide a worthwhile feat for Emotep while you were at it. You lose again. 🙂

You speculate.

Sand suck. All that is required.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You speculate.

Sand suck. All that is required.


Happens on screen.

Provide a feat for the sand that rivals a castlebust.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Different method is attack. One is pure force other isn't.
Abc logic. Dfferent abilities. Etc.
Speculation either way.

..seriously? Sand with the only feat of stripping some flesh of a human (as O'connell would say, he was still juicy) will kill beings which take car-sized-rock-exploding bombs walking? 😐 Rapid-erosion or whatever you want to call it will be based on the same area of durability.

Different abilities? Yes, Twilight is different from Twilight, and Fused Shadows from Fused Shadows..

Yeah, so you have nothing, correct?

[i]Originally posted by BloodRain
Originally posted by quanchi112, name edit by BloodRain[/i
]Magic can defeat Imhotep. (Midna) uses magic therefore what is the logical conclusion ?
Can quite literally keep posting your own words here.

Originally posted by BloodRain
..seriously? Sand with the only feat of stripping some flesh of a human (as O'connell would say, he was still juicy) will kill beings which take car-sized-rock-exploding bombs walking? 😐 Rapid-erosion or whatever you want to call it will be based on the same area of durability.

Different abilities? Yes, Twilight is different from Twilight, and Fused Shadows from Fused Shadows..

Yeah, so you have nothing, correct?

Can quite literally keep posting your own words here.

[/B][/QUOTE] Different attacks its like saying you aren't strong enough to hurt me with your fists but saying suffocation won't kill you either.

Different.

Yes, I'm glad you agree.

No, I do and have proven my case.

You suck at quoting, Quan. It's nearly impressive. haermm

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Happens on screen.

Provide a feat for the sand that rivals a castlebust.

No.

Doesn't have to. Prove its all about power of attack. Horrible logic and speculative to assume what brought castle down. That defeated her and your assuming anything less powerful cannot. Horrific logic.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No.

Doesn't have to. Prove its all about power of attack. Horrible logic and speculative to assume what brought castle down. That defeated her and your assuming anything less powerful cannot. Horrific logic.


That's odd, since the cutscene disagrees with you. 🙂

So you have no feat for the sand demonstrating the power to harm Midna? Then it can't.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
That's odd, since the [b]cutscene disagrees with you. 🙂

So you have no feat for the sand demonstrating the power to harm Midna? Then it can't. [/B]

How so ?

Burden is on you.

Since the castle, you know, explodes.

No, it is not. You have to prove your own case.