Imhotep (Mummy) vs. Midna (Fused Shadows) TP

Started by ScreamPaste22 pages

Then your opinion no longer coutns and it's unanimous. 🙂

Stop making excuses, we see the castle explode.

Emotep can't kill her, he lacks the power.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Then your opinion no longer coutns and it's unanimous. 🙂

Stop making excuses, we see the castle explode.

Emotep can't kill her, he lacks the power.

I am right your wrong.

Speculation.

Has power and kills her. Quit speculating.

Try harder.

Stop making excuses.

No, there is no speculation. Castle Buster > Emotep.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Try harder.

Stop making excuses.

No, there is no speculation. Castle Buster > Emotep.

Cry more.

I'm not.

Speculating. Fanboyism. You.

So you have no argument? Good.

Yes, you are making excuses.

Castle Buster > Emotep.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
So you have no argument? Good.

Yes, you are making excuses.

Castle Buster > Emotep.

No, I already made an argument. You ignored it.

Wrong.

Speculation.

Telling someone to 'cry more' when they prove you wrong is not an argument.

Sure.

It is not speculation, Emotep does not compare to a castle bust.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Telling someone to 'cry more' when they prove you wrong is not an argument.

Sure.

It is not speculation, Emotep does not compare to a castle bust.

You never proved me wrong.

We don't see what hits her only that this method defeats her not that anything less cannot. Quit being dumb.

You can pretend all you like.

We see her destroy the castle with a melee attack, she was point blank, ground zero, even if it was a kamikaze the mere fact she survived means Emotep cannot hurt her.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
You can pretend all you like.

We see her destroy the castle with a melee attack, she was point blank, ground zero, even if it was a kamikaze the mere fact she survived means Emotep cannot hurt her.

Irony.

Speculation.

You refuse to argue? Concession accepted.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
You refuse to argue? Concession accepted.
You speculate which isn't arguing.

There is no speculation here. We have a clear as day cutscene.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
There is no speculation here. We have a clear as day cutscene.
No, camera cuts off so its speculation.

The camera shows her strike the blow from Ganondorf's perspective. There is no speculation.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
The camera shows her strike the blow from Ganondorf's perspective. There is no speculation.
We don't see what hits her. Speculation.

We know the castle explodes with her in it, that's enough since Emotep cannot compare to 1/100th the force.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
We know the castle explodes with her in it, that's enough since Emotep cannot compare to 1/100th the force.
That defeats her and is speculation. Saying something that beats her is only way to defeat her without any proof isn't logical.

There is no speculation. If she was beaten by a castle buster, Emotep cannot harm her because she survived. He cannot create 1/100th the force.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
There is no speculation. If she was beaten by a castle buster, Emotep cannot harm her because she survived. He cannot create 1/100th the force.
Thats saying anything less cannot beat her without her dying. False.

Prove it.