Originally posted by PwnedI get the point here you are here just to troll. You are someone who doesn't contribute to the board but just complains and stirs the pot. I haven't said no to either yet. I need time to think it over. I want an assurance from Bloodrain that he will put aside his bias and his friendship with xanatos for the battlezone to consider it further.
I get the feeling Quan is going to say No to anybody who does not irrationally support Potterverse, or his own socks.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I tend to think your own opinion and the fact you are buddies with these guys might cloud your judgment.
Haha honestly while I would be unbiased, I dont think judging the standard of two arguments is really my area yet. Rather try to get familier with BZ debates first :T
Originally posted by quanchi112lol. That's pretty funny coming from the guy who does nothing BUT troll, complain, and stir the pot. To quote you, I just don't care to debate for or against people I do not know much about. However I, unlike you, just add what I know to the side I know things about instead of irrationally saying they win like my sister used to when she was 6.
I get the point here you are here just to troll. You are someone who doesn't contribute to the board but just complains and stirs the pot.
But you don't stop there, do you? You decide to randomly insult people for no reason. So while you sit in a basement (No, not your mothers. Even she wouldn't want you) jerking off to TB fanfiction where Russel is a Gary Stu, I will be laughing at your inadequacy.
Heheh. I type a lot when I am bored 😛
Originally posted by PwnedListen just troll elsewhere. You are a nobody. No one knows who you are. That must suck. Just go away not like anyone will remember you anyway. Sit back, watch, and learn.
lol. That's pretty funny coming from the guy who does nothing BUT troll, complain, and stir the pot. To quote you, I just don't care to debate for or against people I do not know much about. However I, unlike you, just add what I know to the side I know things about instead of irrationally saying they win like my sister used to when she was 6.But you don't stop there, do you? You decide to randomly insult people for no reason. So while you sit in a basement (No, not your mothers. Even she wouldn't want you) jerking off to TB fanfiction where Russel is a Gary Stu, I will be laughing at your inadequacy.
Heheh. I type a lot when I am bored 😛
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Tentative rules and judges wanted thread for battlezone
My apologies, I though I had replied previously.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I was thinking about this last night. Before the battle commences these parties meet in the middle of the open barren terrain in an effort to avoid war. (Like that's happen with Voldemort and Ganondorf present) Voldemort, Albus Dumbledore, Harry Potter, and Severus Snape meet with Ganondorf, Link, Zelda, and Midna. This is how they know who is in charge without any knowledge of abilities. Sound good ?
Sounds simple enough for the sake of "plot" here.
Originally posted by quanchi112
For me the only victory is complete annihilation or where you can place what remains of the opposition in chains ala prisoners.
Ah, then it renders my previous considerations sort of moot, I think, at least in terms of attacking the castles for victory.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I will leave this up to you. You are free to argue outside of mega attacks which can win the thread singlehandedly. I want to keep atomic bomb type of threats out of this thread as it defeats the purpose.
Well, as previously mentioned, I will be studying my representative faction in detail to prepare myself. If I find any instance where a large scale ability might be useful but not war-ending, I will consider making an argument for it in the battlezone.
Originally posted by quanchi112
When in April would you like to do this ?
Two weeks is the proposed time limit, yes? I also recall you stating you wished to not be involved with this on the 20th? Then what say April 4th to begin, to end on the 18th should we be unable to reach an agreement?
Originally posted by quanchi112You seem to think I care what you think. Truthfully, I would rather not get into some stupid argument and get banned, so I will leave it at this (In the style you seem to favor)
Listen just troll elsewhere. You are a nobody. No one knows who you are. That must suck. Just go away not like anyone will remember you anyway. Sit back, watch, and learn.
Lol nope. Worthless dog.
Originally posted by PwnedYou obviously do since you keep coming back to respond. Just leave as I said you aren't adding anything other than to flame and troll.
You seem to think I care what you think. Truthfully, I would rather not get into some stupid argument and get banned, so I will leave it at this (In the style you seem to favor)Lol nope. Worthless dog.
@Xanatos-- I have to run out so I will have time to respond to your post later.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Tentative rules and judges wanted thread for battlezone
Originally posted by XanatosForeverIs April 4th a Monday ?
My apologies, I though I had replied previously.Sounds simple enough for the sake of "plot" here.
Ah, then it renders my previous considerations sort of moot, I think, at least in terms of attacking the castles for victory.
Well, as previously mentioned, I will be studying my representative faction in detail to prepare myself. If I find any instance where a large scale ability might be useful but not war-ending, I will consider making an argument for it in the battlezone.
Two weeks is the proposed time limit, yes? I also recall you stating you wished to not be involved with this on the 20th? Then what say April 4th to begin, to end on the 18th should we be unable to reach an agreement?