Odin (in Destroyer) vs. Tyrant

@red sabre

Thats BS and you know it; there was no speed blitzing or showing the motions of the punches or any nonsense going on...

The dust was there and had enough time to settle; fact.

Instead of taking advantage of the situation and thrashing Thanos, Odin spoke to him; fact.

Thanos took several panels to stand and he was staggering in all of them except the last one (panel 7); fact.

So please stop with the garbage defenses for Thanos; he got his @ss kicked by Odin and Odin had mercy on him instead of finishing him off...

Thanos recieved a stay of execution...

Read em and weep...

💃

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
@red sabre

Thats BS and you know it; there was no speed blitzing or showing the motions of the punches or any nonsense going on...

The dust was there and had enough time to settle; fact.

Instead of taking advantage of the situation and thrashing Thanos, Odin spoke to him; fact.

Thanos took several panels to stand and he was staggering in all of them except the last one (panel 7); fact.

So please stop with the garbage defenses for Thanos; he got his @ss kicked by Odin and Odin had mercy on him instead of finishing him off...

Thanos recieved a stay of execution...

Read em and weep...

💃

post the scans, first of all do we really see the dust settle? or do we see the dust reaching a point where thanos is just visible however the dust is still in the air? the artist didnt put too much focus on the dust further because he wanted to portray a visibility towards thanos perhaps? and besides all that it takes a small portion of dust mere seconds to disappear in the first place its not like it was a sand storm in the desert it was just dust.

again show me a proof of the time period between each of those pannels, show me a statement stating there is a time limit between each pannel and that those pannels werent meant to portray a motion devided into several pannels.

odin spoke to thanos however there is no evidence it took as you say long time for thanos to get up therefor there is no proof odin could take such an advantage, odin could use this momentum however its clearly not the way you are trying to portray it with nothing but idiotic speculations.

i will say it again, show me a statement or a proof to some sort of a time period between those pannels, as i said earlier those pannels could be a spotlight on the 1 motion thanos made to get up, unless you provide me a proof that his get up was made by several motions with time periods between each, you are talking out of your a$$.

Originally posted by leonidas
i'll say odin in all 3. 1 and 3 are close enough that i wouldn't give either a sweep though.

He might win no. 2.. but that would be it... No. 3 is a stomp in Tyrant's favor

Are people ACTUALLY saying he looked better against Tyrant than Odin LMAO... Against Tyrant his clothes weren't TOTALLY burnt off and he was all cut up.. Against Odin his clothes were almost completly in tact with no cuts or damage visible. If you ask Thanos... He would laugh at this thread being made... Tyrant clearly came off as looking superior to Odin.

Also, are people being stupid on purpose or just stupid in general. Thanos ddn't just go LOOKING FOR THE ORB. HE WENT LOOKING FOR A FIGHT.. HE WANTED TO TEST HIS MIGHT. He prepped... amped his blasts with an orb and still got beaten by Tyrant. Whom he ADMITTED who kill him.No small feat to get Thanos to say that. Against Odin.. he WASN'T looking for a fight... in fact wanted Odn's help... didn't prep.. didn't amp.... and was ready to fit on and NEVER admitted any superiority for Odin.

What can we take from all this... Tyrant wins all except maybe 2.

Originally posted by zopzop

Thanos affected Galactus more than he did Odin or Tyrant. Odin>>>Tyrant>>>>>>Galactus according to your "logic".

Galactus wasn't expecting Thanos to blast him. He didn't brace. Galactus has tanked far more than a Thanos blast.

By my logic I gave a three scenario proposition. If prop. 1 doesn't work then try prop. 2, and if that doesn't work then prop. 3

So again, my logic is flawless.

@red sabre

Your entire argument is garbage...

Look up the fight yourself and you'll see that you are the one talking out your @ss...

And, no, I wont post scans for you as we've all seen them before millions of times; get off your @ss and find them yourself...

💃

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
@red sabre

Your entire argument is garbage...

Look up the fight yourself and you'll see that [b]you are the one talking out your @ss...

And, no, I wont post scans for you as we've all seen them before millions of times; get off your @ss and find them yourself...

💃 [/B]

Originally posted by Sundipped
You lie about how many sentences you type (you can't even get that right) and we're supposed to believe your fantasy take on the fight? 😂

That's what I meant by stop embarrassing yourself.

Originally posted by zopzop
Smoldering ruin? He was just fine. Even his clothes were barely singed. Compared to how he looked vs Tyrant with his outfit completely wrecked and his body all cut up.

And he took time to get up vs Tyrant too. Or did you ignore those scans?

This is why debating this topic is impossible. Haters ignore on panel evidence and make up sh|t as they go along.

Anyway, I'm done here.

@Sundipped
Don't waste your time. What's the point of "debating" people that ignore what's on panel and make up just so stories as they go along?

Thanos affected Galactus more than he did Odin or Tyrant. Odin>>>Tyrant>>>>>>Galactus according to your "logic".

Well, I wish I cared more about this match up, but I can't seem to muster up any real "bile".

I can stand behind my argument in Odin's favor, quite easily. On-panel, Odin seemed to show a more decisive defeat of Thanos. These details are what I have been defending.

To give a kick in the balls to any of you that were so frightened by my arguments, that you had to stoop to attacking my credibility and honesty, I give you this:

In truth, according to statements and printed history, Tyrant SHOULD be on a tier above Odin. Obviously, Tyrant has proven himself to have the ability to raise himself to the point of being a potential threat to Universal Abstract Entities, although this level of power has not been shown to be his usual nature.

So, based on comic book data, yes, Tyrant should be a level above Odin and able to defeat him.

Does this take anything from an argument that is stating that Thanos had a more decisive loss against Odin, than Tyrant? No. Everybody has a bad day.

Originally posted by Horrificus
Well, I wish I cared more about this match up, but I can't seem to muster up any real "bile".

I can stand behind my argument in Odin's favor, quite easily. On-panel, Odin seemed to show a more decisive defeat of Thanos. These details are what I have been defending.

To give a kick in the balls to any of you that were so frightened by my arguments, that you had to stoop to attacking my credibility and honesty, I give you this:

In truth, according to statements and printed history, Tyrant SHOULD be on a tier above Odin. Obviously, Tyrant has proven himself to have the ability to raise himself to the point of being a potential threat to Universal Abstract Entities, although this level of power has not been shown to be his usual nature.

So, based on comic book data, yes, Tyrant should be a level above Odin and able to defeat him.

Does this take anything from an argument that is stating that Thanos had a more decisive loss against Odin, than Tyrant? No. Everybody has a bad day.

The problem is that you are, in a way, using the A, B, C logic; which is explicitly forbidden based on it's complete lack of credibility. Furthermore, you are utilizing an even more obscure form of A, B,C logic which smells of a lack of integrity.
That also seems to be the only point you are clinging to, which shows an extreme bias towards Odin.........

Originally posted by Horrificus
Why so serious?

Originally posted by Horrificus
Well, I wish I cared more about this match up, but I can't seem to muster up any real "bile".

I can stand behind my argument in Odin's favor, quite easily. On-panel, Odin seemed to show a more decisive defeat of Thanos. These details are what I have been defending.

To give a kick in the balls to any of you that were so frightened by my arguments, that you had to stoop to attacking my credibility and honesty, I give you this:

In truth, according to statements and printed history, Tyrant SHOULD be on a tier above Odin. Obviously, Tyrant has proven himself to have the ability to raise himself to the point of being a potential threat to Universal Abstract Entities, although this level of power has not been shown to be his usual nature.

So, based on comic book data, yes, Tyrant should be a level above Odin and able to defeat him.

Does this take anything from an argument that is stating that Thanos had a more decisive loss against Odin, than Tyrant? No. Everybody has a bad day.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He asked you to post scans. Saying his argument is garbage isn't debating. Prove him wrong. If you can't then you concede.

More Quanchi fueled BS...

Every single person who has posted in this thread has seen that fight 20+ times and has the scenes memorized; he's trying to BS his way to making Thanos seem to be better than he really is just like you are...

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
I'd be happy to...

Panel one: Odin has dropped Thanos to his knees and they converse; both are obscured by dust in this panel (important visual clue pertaining to time elapsed between this panel and the next)...

Panel two: Silence and the dust has settled (thus significant time has passed from panels 1 and 2); Odin is standing close by Thanos spear in hand and Thanos is still down on his knees...

Panel three: "Do you yeild villian?"

Panel four: Thanos starts to rise...

Panel five: Thanos is clearly staggering...

Panel six: Thanos continues to rise but is still staggered...

Panel seven: Thanos states "no."

Now, to respond your claim that an attack by Odin would have been ineffective during that period of time, I call call bulls**t; Thanos was still staggered at panel 6...Odin had PLENTY on time to attack the helpless Thanos between panels 1 and 7...plenty of time.

Thanos was defenseless and Odin had mercy on him...

Read em and weep...

💃

I say again, we all know the above scenes by heart; no need to post them...

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
More Quanchi fueled BS...

Every single person who has posted in this thread has seen that fight 20+ times and has the scenes memorized; he's trying to BS his way to making Thanos seem to be better than he really is just like you are...

Originally posted by zopzop
Shut up 🙁

Except it's not true. The on panel evidence speaks for itself.

Well, that's your opinion. And I have no problem with you or anybody else having a different opinion from mine.

However, calling somebody a liar or attacking their integrity because they do not agree with you is usually the simplest, most cowardly avenue available.

Your opinion is, by no means, shared by anything like a majority of forum members when it comes to this subject.

And, the hilarious thing is, every time I see the same group of you in these threads, you all suddenly go from Jekyl to Hyde. So, I think the creepy levels of bias fall more on you guys than on me.

You can say whatever you want. In my opinion, a smiling, rested Thanos, claiming a victory of sorts, will always seem to have fared better than a smoldering, silent Thanos written to show several panels passing for the time it takes to stand. That was done for a REASON zop. And THAT reason was not to show how fast Thanos got back up and how well he was doing. 😆 It was to show just how f'd up he got from Odin. Plain and simple.

It doesn't matter what happened to Thanos' uniform. Who knows what type of attacks Odin and Tyrant used. Obviously, Tyrant's burnt off his clothes, where Odin's took the wind out of his sails. 2 different things happening.

But, if you don't agree, I'm not going to be a d!ck head to you or call you names or say you are lying about anything. You just disagree.

Whatever.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Saying a poster's argument is crap isn't countering his argument. If you aren't going to post scans then at least counter but if you cannot then you concede.

Reading comprehension isnt a strength of yours...is it?

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
I'd be happy to...

Panel one: Odin has dropped Thanos to his knees and they converse; both are obscured by dust in this panel (important visual clue pertaining to time elapsed between this panel and the next)...

Panel two: Silence and the dust has settled (thus significant time has passed from panels 1 and 2); Odin is standing close by Thanos spear in hand and Thanos is still down on his knees...

Panel three: "Do you yeild villian?"

Panel four: Thanos starts to rise...

Panel five: Thanos is clearly staggering...

Panel six: Thanos continues to rise but is still staggered...

Panel seven: Thanos states "no."

Now, to respond your claim that an attack by Odin would have been ineffective during that period of time, I call call bulls**t; Thanos was still staggered at panel 6...Odin had PLENTY on time to attack the helpless Thanos between panels 1 and 7...plenty of time.

Thanos was defenseless and Odin had mercy on him...

Read em and weep...

💃

red sabre=countered and owned.

💃

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Reading comprehension isnt a strength of yours...is it?

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
@red sabre

Your entire argument is garbage...

Look up the fight yourself and you'll see that [b]you are the one talking out your @ss...

And, no, I wont post scans for you as we've all seen them before millions of times; get off your @ss and find them yourself...

💃 [/B]

prove me wrong, i brought you an argument and all you are doing is trash talking? i guess you can smell the loss Lol, consider yourself owned.