Riggs versus McClane, the durability test

Started by The Fat Rambo4 pages

Riggs versus McClane, the durability test

Ok, so we have Martin Riggs from Lethal Weapon and John Mcclane from Die Hard. Both bad asses with insane damage soak. Who has the greatest damage soak/durability?

All durability feats count. Why? Because the McClane nuthuggers wil focus on LW4 Riggs, and not LW2-4 Riggs.

So, thoughts?

Re: Riggs versus McClane, the durability test

You seem upset; it's not good to make a thread with venom laid into the OP.

Lol, u already mad. Bring the feats or GTFO.

Very well.

DH 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

McClane still laying waste to Moscow and surviving stuff to inhuman levels at the age of like 60.

Riggs being dominated, worn down and beaten in sparring by a rookie with a slow crap jab in LW 3 or 4, being to slow and old to avoid it.
McClane stomps like the very originator of the term "stomp".
All witnesses to the competition recoil in sympathetic/empathic horror for Riggs and the phrase "Oh the humanitaugh" is used.

/End thread. 🙂

Both have insane feats. to level them against each other requires research I'm not willing to invest.

Indy-

-Surviving a fall from a plane in a life raft. Temple of Doom = impossible
-Surviving a fall through several awnings on the side of a building. Temple of Doom = possible
-Surviving being in a fridge within a nuclear explosion. Crystal Skull = impossible.

McClane-

-Building jump with firehose into window whilst shooting it. Die Hard = highly unlikely.
-Surviving the train crash. Die Hard Vengeance = possible.
-Fall from the sky from rope onto transport cannisters. DHwaV = highly unlikely.
-Falling 20+ stories from a building through construction tubes. DH5 = impossible.

Just my thoughts.

This belongs in the McClane Vs Indiana Jones thread.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Very well.

DH 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

McClane still laying waste to Moscow and surviving stuff to inhuman levels at the age of like 60.

Riggs being dominated, worn down and beaten in sparring by a rookie with a slow crap jab in LW 3 or 4, being to slow and old to avoid it.
McClane stomps like the very originator of the term "stomp".
All witnesses to the competition recoil in sympathetic/empathic horror for Riggs and the phrase "Oh the humanitaugh" is used.

/End thread. 🙂

LW1, torture scene. LW2, fight with the guy that kills his woman.

/thread.

Originally posted by Robtard
This belongs in the McClane Vs Indiana Jones thread.

Woops wrong thread 😛

Originally posted by Robtard
This belongs in the McClane Vs Indiana Jones thread.
You mean the Indy>>>McClane thread.

Naturally that doesnt exist.

As old man Jones is WTFPWNED by McClane at the same age, by movie feats.

Indy pwns McClane 24/7
As of DH5, McClane pwns Riggs in durability

He pwned Riggs all day long in 1-4.

Nah Indy pales into utter insignificance next to McClane of DH5.
And given how slow he was in his prime, he loses to even to old man McClane, who punches thunderously at the speed of lightning and KO's mofos all day long..

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Naturally that doesnt exist.

As old man Jones is WTFPWNED by McClane at the same age, by movie feats.

There you go again, focusing on low end feats. My thread, my rules. High end feats trump everything else. LW1 torture scene and the LW2 fight scene on the barge>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Any McClane durability feat. Fact, not opinion.

And to think you called me a gimper before.

riggs eats dog biscuits, man he eats dog biscuits...,Riggs wins

Originally posted by The Fat Rambo
There you go again, focusing on low end feats. My thread, my rules. High end feats trump everything else. LW1 torture scene and the LW2 fight scene on the barge>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Any McClane durability feat. Fact, not opinion.

YouTube video

YouTube video

😬

Riggs is tough. But McClane has taken on much tougher. I don't even think Bauer has McClane in the durability department. Now, as Robtard said, durability isn't everything in a match, so Riggs could probably take him in a fight, but from a pure durability standpoint, McClane rapes.

Riggs is too slow and posey to deal with the Lighting fast hooks that McClane has.

Riggs was WTF dominated and pwned by a rookie with a basic jab onsceen. No way hes avoiding, tanking or countering those lightning explosive hooks that KO mofos in one shot.

By mofos you mean bystanders and featless goons right?

You mean like how Van Zan was unable to KO the featless goon named Quinn?

Originally posted by The Fat Rambo
High end feats trump everything else. LW1 torture scene and the LW2 fight scene on the barge>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Any McClane durability feat. Fact, not opinion.
Once again people don't understand the concept of torture, they weren't trying to kill Riggs, they wanted to hurt him some so he talked and being shocked a bit is above crashing and rolling (and rolling etc) inside a Unimog that was going high speed while not wearing a seat belt, as just one example of McClane's cartoon levels of durability.

Re: Riggs versus McClane, the durability test

Originally posted by The Fat Rambo
McClane nuthuggers

in OP no less. lol @ preemptive butthurt.