Riggs versus McClane, the durability test

Started by The Fat Rambo4 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
Since when in being able to grab a gun and shoot yourself through the body with it in order to kill the bad guy behind you not continuing the fight?

It should also be noted that be did this at the very end of the film and having had previously survived explosions, slams, kicks, drops, being shot etc.

All trumped by a quick snap of his neck.

McClane's neck seems to be unsnappable.

O'rly? And when did he have someone actually trying to break it?

In DH1, within the 1st clash the guy was trying to ram McClane's head through a wall to smash his head/neck.
The tumble down the stairs broke Karl's bro's neck, McClane's was unbroken... many many incidents in the DHs should have broken his whole body neck included... never happened though cause bone structure wise, he appears to be unbreakable...

But this is all moot, as McClane would WTF KO Riggs with a leading, thunder-and-lightning on-form-Tyson hook as Riggs approached.

Originally posted by The Fat Rambo
All trumped by a quick snap of his neck.

Breaking a neck is not a durability feat.

Surviving explosions, falls, slams, hits, bumps etc that would liquify a normal person's neck is though, which McClane has in spades. Another +1 for the McClane. Not having his neck broken since 1988 and still counting.

Originally posted by Robtard
Breaking a neck is not a durability feat.

Surviving explosions, falls, slams, hits, bumps etc that would liquify a normal person's neck is though, which McClane has in spades. Another +1 for the McClane. Not having his neck broken since 1988 and still counting.

All trumped by six .44's to the lung.

Keep ignoring that.