Imhotep vs Voldemort

Originally posted by quanchi112
Everyone who is mortal has a soul so what else left him ?

He wasn’t mortal tho so this point is moot.

Originally posted by quanchi112
We see his immortality taken in part 2 in an entirely different manner. Taking the soul away also does so. Connect the dots and think for yourself.

That proves his immortality wasn’t tied to his soul at all. You’ve proven my point.

Originally posted by quanchi112
1. The reason he doesn't die when his soul is taken is simple. That's what is connected to his immortality so that was taken not his life. That simply makes him mortal since the only part of anyone that is immortal on its own is its soul outside weird exceptions.

Yeah this makes no sense. If your soul leaves you die in The Mummy which is proven more than once. If he lost his soul he would have lost his life at the same time. He did not therefore it was not his soul that was removed. Surely you can follow this.

Originally posted by quanchi112
2. Wrong. It attacks both. Every time you kill someone a Horcrux isn't created. Due to the odd circumstances of the sacrifice and it rebounding onto himself this created one. Other than that you need to perform certain dark magic to create one. The killing curse attacked Voldemort's soul that was in Harry. In the Potterverse you can take a soul without killing someone thus proving my point ala Dementors kiss. I'm so ****ing good. 💃

I never said “killing someone makes a Horcrux”. Try not to strawman me. I said “killing tears the soul” and it was confirmed that the piece torn off attached itself to Harry due to Voldemort’s body being destroyed. The Killing Curse kills, there were two things that could be killed, it killed one of them. What are you not understanding here? Yes they can survive soulless which proves the curse does not remove the soul but only kills. The soul then leaves on its own.

Originally posted by quanchi112
3. I'm right. In Potterverse you can survive and live minus a soul. The av does both. It causes exit of soul and death.

You are horribly wrong. The Curse does one. It causes death. The soul leaves as an after effect.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Consider yourself served.

Still waiting on my order miss.

Originally posted by quanchi112
A Horcrux is the soul. Key word here being soul.

I won the moment you acknowledged specific magic works.

I don't need to since Imhotep has no resistance feats. Your responses are nuh uh. The Mummy at full power is an immortal. Ability to live forever. That's the definition not unkillable.

You don't even understand your own points and I have yet to see you win a single debate. One can dream.

😂 Wrong again. A Horcrux is some vessel a soul or part of a soul is stored in. You should really know the basics of the franchise you champion.

You've been losing since the first page. Voldermort doesn't have that specific make-Inhotep-mortal spell.

So another dodge.

Originally posted by juggerman
Still waiting on my order miss.

😂

Originally posted by Robtard
Wrong again. A Horcrux is some vessel a soul or part of a soul is stored in.

You've been losing since the first page. Voldermort doesn't have that specific make-Inhitep-mortal spell.

So another dodge.

Like I've said before, quan has never actually seen the movies; he's just watched a few youtube vids.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Like I've said before, quan has never actually seen the movies; he's just watched a few youtube vids.

Originally posted by Robtard
😂 Wrong again. A Horcrux is some vessel a soul or part of a soul is stored in. You should really know the basics of the franchise you champion.

You've been losing since the first page. Voldermort doesn't have that specific make-Inhotep-mortal spell.

So another dodge.

Av works. No resistance.

I've explained my logic yours consists of nuh uh Imhotep is different.

Originally posted by quanchi112
This from the guy who claimed horcruxes don't make you immortal just able to resurrect yourself. 😂

Try watching the movies.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, it's the soul or a fraction of it stored in something. I've explained what he put his soul into and you have the nerve to try to act like I don't know what it is. Horcruxes have to do with a fragment of a soul.

Av works. No resistance.

I've explained my logic yours consists of nuh uh Imhotep is different.

😂 Acting like you knew. You just said "A Horcrux is the soul.". You were wrong. A Horcux is a vessel which holds a soul/piece of a soul. Have some dignity for once.

AV kills. You have yet to show how it's going to kill an immortal undead guy.

You've made stuff up and you've shown you don't have basic HP knowledge. Let alone remember much of anything from The Mummy.

Originally posted by quanchi112
A Horcrux is the soul. Key word here being soul.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Like I've said before, quan has never actually seen the movies; he's just watched a few youtube vids.

Very possible, considering how consistently wrong his claims are.

I'm next 😄

Originally posted by juggerman
He wasn’t mortal tho so this point is moot.

That proves his immortality wasn’t tied to his soul at all. You’ve proven my point.

Yeah this makes no sense. If your soul leaves you die in The Mummy which is proven more than once. If he lost his soul he would have lost his life at the same time. He did not therefore it was not his soul that was removed. Surely you can follow this.

I never said “killing someone makes a Horcrux”. Try not to strawman me. I said “killing tears the soul” and it was confirmed that the piece torn off attached itself to Harry due to Voldemort’s body being destroyed. The Killing Curse kills, there were two things that could be killed, it killed one of them. What are you not understanding here? Yes they can survive soulless which proves the curse does not remove the soul but only kills. The soul then leaves on its own.

You are horribly wrong. The Curse does one. It causes death. The soul leaves as an after effect.

Still waiting on my order miss.

No, it proves his soul is one way to take away his immortality. There is also another way.

No, the curse made him able to live without his soul or without his powers in both movies.

No, the curse proves it does both. Killing both causes the soul to leave and death. The Dementors kiss proves taking a soul doesn't kill you. My case is proven.

The curse can attack a portion of the soul inside a person. Harry didn't die. Point proven.

Voldemort 10/10.

Originally posted by Robtard
Very possible, considering how consistently wrong his claims are.

He actually thinks that a horcrux stops you from dying, rather than anchoring part of your soul so that you can be resurrected.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He was mortal and being immortal doesnt mean it destroys his soul. We see it flee.

No, it proves his soul is one way to take away his immortality. There is also another way.

No, the curse made him able to live without his soul or without his powers in both movies.

No, the curse proves it does both. Killing both causes the soul to leave and death. The Dementors kiss proves taking a soul doesn't kill you. My case is proven.

The curse can attack a portion of the soul inside a person. Harry didn't die. Point proven.

Voldemort 10/10.

And here i was excited for absolutely NOTHING!

“Everyone who is mortal has a soul….. even the immortal mortals” doesn’t seem a tad bit strange to you? We see “something” flee yes.

It proves his soul and immortality are in no way connected.

No the curse took away his immortality. If he was absent a soul he would have died as proven in the franchise.

Did you just say “Killing both causes the soul to leave and death”? Holy hell I think we’re on to something. Finally you make some sense. Killing does indeed cause death AND the soul to leave because the soul leaves when death occurs. So “killing”, with a bullet even, causes the soul to leave the body. Glad you finally conceded that point. Killing Curse causes killing and soul leaving is a direct result.

The curse can kill a piece of someone living in someone else. My point is proven indeed

Voldemort loses 10/10. It’s been fun friend 😎

Originally posted by Robtard
😂 Acting like you knew. You just said "A Horcrux is the soul.". You were wrong. A Horcux is a vessel which holds a soul/piece of a soul. Have some dignity for once.

AV kills. You have yet to show how it's going to kill an immortal undead guy.

You've made stuff up and you've shown you don't have basic HP knowledge. Let alone remember much of anything from The Mummy.

😂

You have yet to prove magical resistance.

Someone at a gas station told me Fiendfyre destroyed a Horcrux.--Robard

Originally posted by Silent Master
He actually thinks that a horcrux stops you from dying, rather than anchoring part of your soul so that you can be resurrected.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Someone at a gas station told me Fiendfyre destroyed a Horcrux.--Robard

He was probably remebering what happened in the book but still 😂

Voldemort wasnt Immortal for one... He had the Horcrux which was stuff that would allow him to come back incase he was killed. He only had a limited number. He was bascially a powerful cat with 9 lives.

Imhotep is Immortal. He was depowered only be that which GAVE him the power in the first place.

Unless Voldemort has the Book of the Dead to Depower Imhotep I do not see Voldemort winning. And Crucio, a spell to inflict pain, wouldnt work. The guy got his Arm cut off and didnt even flinch. He threw Rick with his one attached arm like a rag doll, picked up his removed arm LIKE A BAWS! and put it back on like it was a freaking Skeletal Lego Man arm!

Originally posted by quanchi112
It has to do with the soul stored in it. Harry Potter didn't lose a Voldemort kidney but the part of Voldemort's soul inside him.

You have yet to prove magical resistance.

Someone at a gas station told me Fiendfyre destroyed a Horcrux.--Robard

Yeah, I just corrected you and let you know a Horcrux is a vessel, not a soul, which is what you thought. Oh my. When AV killed Potter, it destroyed the piece of Voldermort's soul inside him. Just the same when the other Horcruxs were destroyed and the pieces of soul inside them where destroyed. Destroy the Horcrux = destroy that piece of stored soul, you're so dense.

You have yet to prove AV can kill an immortal undead guy. He doesn't need magical resistance from AV, being immortal and undead, means he can't die from a spell designed to kill the living, dunce.

This thread is a treasure:

"Immortality doesn't mean being immortal to death" - Quanchi112 😂

"Imhotep is living he is immortal." - Quanchi112 😂

"A Horcrux is the soul. Key word here being soul." - Quanchi112 😂

Originally posted by juggerman
And here i was excited for absolutely NOTHING!

“Everyone who is mortal has a soul….. even the immortal mortals” doesn’t seem a tad bit strange to you? We see “something” flee yes.

It proves his soul and immortality are in no way connected.

No the curse took away his immortality. If he was absent a soul he would have died as proven in the franchise.

Did you just say “Killing both causes the soul to leave and death”? Holy hell I think we’re on to something. Finally you make some sense. Killing does indeed cause death AND the soul to leave because the soul leaves when death occurs. So “killing”, with a bullet even, causes the soul to leave the body. Glad you finally conceded that point. Killing Curse causes killing and soul leaving is a direct result.

The curse can kill a piece of someone living in someone else. My point is proven indeed

Voldemort loses 10/10. It’s been fun friend 😎

It proves they are absolutely connected to his supposed invincibility to mortal weapons.

You're into something. A bullet to Harry's head causes Harry's soul and his death whereas the Av can just cause Voldemort's soul to leave thereby proving a clear difference.

The curse can attack the soul inside Harry without killing Harry unlike a bullet to Harry's head.

Voldemort wins, 10/10. Magic wrecks Imhotep especially Voldemort's specific magic.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yeah, I just corrected you and let you know a Horcrux is a vessel, not a soul, which is what you thought. Oh my. When AV killed Potter, it destroyed the piece of Voldermort's soul inside him. Just the same when the other Horcruxs were destroyed and the pieces of soul inside them where destroyed. Destroy the Horcrux = destroy that piece of stored soul, you're so dense.

You have yet to prove AV can kill an immortal undead guy. He doesn't need magical resistance from AV, being immortal and undead, means he can't die from a spell designed to kill the living, dunce.

This thread is a treasure:

"Immortality doesn't mean being immortal to death" - Quanchi112 😂

"Imhotep is living he is immortal." - Quanchi112 😂

"A Horcrux is the soul. Key word here being soul." - Quanchi112 😂

Imhoteps invincibility to mortal weapons goes away but he's never resisted magic to begin with. Voldemort doesn't use a gun you silly man.

I watched the Harry Potter movies once.--Robard
I argue based on what people tell me without thinking for myself.--robtard