Originally posted by KazenjiNo, I never said that. You are lying or can't comprehend. Seriously, why debate if you cannot comprehend. Weird.
Clearly you don't remember a couple pages backyou were pretty much saying Imhotep could be hurt by mortal weapons and now your changing your opinion
and how's life in your hobbit hole.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I don't even need to since Imhotep has not one single feat to suggest he can resist magic let alone specific magic.Immortal clearly means the ability to live forever not unkillable. We've seen him killed twice now. 😂
Now resume crying due to Voldemort's win.
Cowardly dodge again. It's your way.
Page 7 I posted the description of the word for you. Go back and read it again, dunce. Repeat: Killed while he was mortal 😂 . So there goes that fail of yours again.
You've not shown how he wins. You've only shown you have little memory of The Mummy and a desperate need to have your favorite win every thread.
"Immortality doesn't mean being immortal to death" - Quanchi112 😂
"Imhotep is living he is immortal." - Quanchi112 😂
Originally posted by RobtardYou said very early on that specific magic works on Imhotep and then stupidly say not this magic's specificity.
Cowardly dodge again. It's your way.Page 7 I posted the description of the word for you. Go back and read it again, dunce. Repeat: Killed while he was mortal 😂 . So there goes that fail of yours again.
You've not shown how he wins. You've only shown you have little memory of The Mummy and a desperate need to have your favorite win every thread.
"Immortality doesn't mean being immortal to death" - Quanchi112 😂
"Imhotep is living he is immortal." - Quanchi112 😂
Ability to live forever. Very few immortals can not be killed in some manner. Immortal doesnt mean unkillable. You really are a treat.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You said very early on that specific magic works on Imhotep and then stupidly say not this magic's specificity.Ability to live forever. Very few immortals can not be killed in some manner. Immortal doesnt mean unkillable. You really are a treat.
The spell in the book of Amon-Ra was a spell designed to specifically make Imhotep mortal.
Repeat: Different spells do different things. AV is not like the spell in that book. It's a killing spell; not a make-an-immortal-mortal spell. No matter how hard you cry for a win.
If you remembered anything about The Mummy, you'd know this, as I've had to tell you Imhotep could turn himself into sand and that he's still a mummy/undead under his skin, which you claimed he was living.
Page 7, go read the dictionary's description. You really are a dunce.
"Immortality doesn't mean being immortal to death" - Quanchi112 😂
"Imhotep is living he is immortal." - Quanchi112 😂
Originally posted by RobtardTo bolster your case that this magic fails you need a magic resisting feat. You don't have one.
The spell in the book of Amon-Ra was a spell designed to specifically make Imhotep mortal.Repeat: Different spells do different things. AV is not like the spell in that book. It's a killing spell; not a make-an-immortal-mortal spell. No matter how hard you cry for a win.
If you remembered anything about The Mummy, you'd know this, as I've had to tell you Imhotep could turn himself into sand and that he's still a mummy/undead under his skin, which you claimed he was living.
Page 7, go read the dictionary's description. You really are a dunce.
"Immortality doesn't mean being immortal to death" - Quanchi112 😂
"Imhotep is living he is immortal." - Quanchi112 😂
Av kills and he can clearly die. Twice.
Yes, he can but Voldemort can possess his foes or fly. 😂
You still don't know the difference between immortal and unkillable.
Originally posted by quanchi112
To bolster your case that this magic fails you need a magic resisting feat. You don't have one.Av kills and he can clearly die. Twice.
Yes, he can but Voldemort can possess his foes or fly. 😂
You still don't know the difference between immortal and unkillable.
You have yet to show how AV can kill an immortal undead guy.
Repeat: Died while in mortal form. Cry more now.
No limit fallacy. Flying won't save him. He can only maybe run away. with flying 😂
The guy who's scared of the dictionary shouldn't make such claims. Go to page 7, coward.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You've already admitted specific magic works. You've already admitted he can die. Taking his soul makes him mortal.
Repeat: Anytime you want to prove AV is like that spell and show where Imhotep died in immortal form(not mortal), do so. But you can't and this is why you do your dummy-dance.
Originally posted by RobtardWhat we know
Repeat: Anytime you want to prove AV is like that spell and show where Imhotep died in immortal form(not mortal), do so. But you can't and this is why you do your dummy-dance.
Specific magic works on Imhotep
Imhotep can die
Logical conclusion: Voldemort kills him with specific magic.
Originally posted by quanchi112
What we knowSpecific magic works on Imhotep
Imhotep can dieLogical conclusion: Voldemort kills him with specific magic.
Facts:
A specific spell that Voldermort doesn't have.
If he's turned mortal first. (Voldermort can't do this)
Logical Conclusion: You're a clown who'll do anything so your favorite can win. Cry more now. 🙂
Originally posted by RobtardHe doesn't need the same spell since Imhotep hasn't resisted any magic.
Facts:A specific spell that Voldermort doesn't have.
If he's turned mortal first.Logical Conclusion: You're a clown who'll do anything so your favorite can win. Cry more now. 🙂
You aren't even bright enough to understand basic logic so I don't expect you to get it.
Originally posted by quanchi112
He doesn't need the same spell since Imhotep hasn't resisted any magic.You aren't even bright enough to understand basic logic so I don't expect you to get it.
Back to your no limit fallacy. 'AV killed wizards, so it an kill an undead immortal'. That's still a fail. Try again?
I can read and comprehend the dictionary at least 🙂
Originally posted by RobtardKilling Imhotep isn't a no limits fallacy. It's based on him not resisting magic and having been killed twice. Your opinion is based on nothing.
Back to your no limit fallacy. 'AV killed wizards, so it an kill an undead immortal'. That's still a fail. Try again?I can read and comprehend the dictionary at least 🙂
Originally posted by quanchi112
Killing Imhotep isn't a no limits fallacy. It's based on him not resisting magic and having been killed twice.Your opinion is based on nothing.
AV doing whatever you need it to at the given moment is the no limit fallacy. You not being able to understand that he was killed while in mortal form; not immortal form is concerning.
It's not my opinion that different spells do different things, that's just common sense. It's a fact that immortal Imhotep never died. Watch the films, okay 🙂