Imhotep vs Voldemort

Originally posted by Robtard
AV doing whatever you need it to at the given moment is the no limit fallacy. You not being able to understand that he was killed while in mortal form; not immortal form is concerning.

It's not my opinion that different spells do different things, that's just common sense. It's a fact that immortal Imhotep never died. Watch the films, okay 🙂

Imhotep can have his immortality stripped and is only immune to mortal weapons. All facts, kid.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, it's just it doing its function against someone with no magical immunity so it's logical.

Imhotep can have his immortality stripped and is only immune to mortal weapons. All facts, kid.

Repeat: Please show me where AV has killed an immortal undead person like Imhotep or comparable? (I expect another dodge)

Parroting what you've been taught and then acting like you knew all along is cute. But the point: Voldermort doesn't have the spell to strip Imhotep of his immortality. Voldermort loses. 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Repeat: Please show me where AV has killed an immortal undead person like Imhotep or comparable? (I expect another dodge)

Parroting what you've been taught and then acting like you knew all along is cute. But the point: Voldermort doesn't have the spell to strip Imhotep of his immortality. Voldermort loses. 🙂

How does Imhotep resist Crucio ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
It's the same response; nuh uh. You run from what we know the facts. Voldemort's spell strips him of his soul and kills him.

How does Imhotep resist Crucio ?

The expected dodge followed by the same empty claims as you have yet to show this. Fail and fail.

Repeat: Cos he doesn't feel pain and is undead. Does Crucio work on the undead?

Originally posted by Robtard
The expected dodge followed by the same empty claims as you have yet to show this. Fail and fail.

Repeat: Cos he doesn't feel pain and is undead. Does Crucio work on the undead?

Crucio causes no real pain. It's magic but I already knew what you'd say despite no proof to suggest otherwise.

Originally posted by quanchi112
These are facts while your entire defense is entirely speculation.

Crucio causes no real pain. It's magic but I already knew what you'd say despite no proof to suggest otherwise.

You've yet to prove AV takes away someone's soul. You've yet to prove AV can work on an undead immortal.

WRONG. 😂 Crucio causes pain, while inflicting no physical damage. You don't even now the basics of your favorite. 😂 Poor stupid Quanchi. So you can't prove Crucio works on the undead and are resorting to lies crying. Not surprised.

Originally posted by Robtard
You've yet to prove AV takes away someone's soul. You've yet to prove AV can work on an undead immortal.

WRONG. 😂 Crucio causes pain, while inflicting no physical damage. You don't even now the basics of your favorite. 😂 Poor stupid Quanchi. So you can't prove Crucio works on the undead and are resorting to lies crying. Not surprised.

It causes a feeling of pain not actual pain since it isn't really hurting you. It's just torture minus the reality of it save the magic's effect.

Your nuh uh responses isn't how to debate. Facts back me up, robtroll.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You said if just kills you but it didn't kill Harry when it hit him in Deathly Hallows part 2.

It causes a feeling of pain not actual pain since it isn't really hurting you. It's just torture minus the reality of it save the magic's effect.

Your nuh uh responses isn't how to debate. Facts back me up, robtroll.

Oh my. It send him to limbo, ie part of the afterlife. Are you now trying to insist the AV doesn't kill? Cos, damn.

😂 You were wrong and are dancing now. Pain is a feeling. Just accept and move on gracefully, clown.

I accept that you can't show Crucio working on the undead. 🙂

Originally posted by Robtard
Oh my. It send him to limbo, ie part of the afterlife. Are you now trying to insist the AV doesn't kill? Cos, damn.

😂 You were wrong and are dancing now. Just accept and move on gracefully, clown.

Do you think av victims can always choose to come back ?

Magic works against Imhotep. Evidence backs me up unlike you.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It didn't kill him. It drove out Voldemort's soul.

Do you think av victims can always choose to come back ?

Magic works against Imhotep. Evidence backs me up unlike you.

It technically killed Harry too, as he was sent to limbo but was sent back to his physical body. A piece of Voldermort's soul being in him as also a likely factor. As Voldermort felt the AV too.

Obvs no.

And AV isnt killing an immortal undead guy. Crucio isn't harming an undead guy. Your inability to support your claims is what always ends you.

Lestov is right, you have little imagination and just rant the same crap over and over.

Originally posted by Robtard
It technically killed Harry too, as he was sent to limbo but was sent back to his physical body. A piece of Voldermort's soul being in him as also a likely factor. As Voldermort felt the AV too.

Obvs no.

And AV isnt killing an immortal undead guy. Crucio isn't harming an undead guy. Your inability to support your claims is what always ends you.

Lestov is right, you have little imagination and just rant the same crap over and over.

Game, set, match.

You have nothing to base him resisting it off of since specific magic has killed him.

You have no basis for anything in this thread. Unsubstantiated bs from you.

I argue in character unlike your fanboy ass.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, if it worked on Harry like its supposed to he wouldn't have been allowed to come back. So now you admit it attacked Voldemort's soul. 😂

Game, set, match.

You have nothing to base him resisting it off of since specific magic has killed him.

You have no basis for anything in this thread. Unsubstantiated bs from you.

I argue in character unlike your fanboy ass.

As a horcrux. You don't even know the subtleties your own favorite franchise.

False claims of victory. Another of your clown tactics. 🙂

You've have yet to show AV killing an undead immortal. Just as you couldn't show Fiend Fyre burning away sand. Just as you couldn't show Crucio working on the undead. All empty claims.

Except the The Mummy, which you don't remember.

And the expected "you're a fanboy" response when you're at your wits end. Seems people are fanboys of whatever they crush you with 🙂 The Mummy fanboys, how desperate 😂

Originally posted by Robtard
As a horcrux. You don't even know your own franchise.

False claims of victory. Another of your clown tactics. 🙂

You've have ye to show AV killing an undead immortal. Just as you couldn't show Crucio working on the undead.

Except the The Mummy, which you don't remember.

No, I don't. Not one resistance magic feat. Magic clearly works. Fact.

FFS, clowning and dodging, here you go again:

As a horcrux. You don't even know the subtleties your own favorite franchise.

False claims of victory. Another of your clown tactics. 🙂

You've have yet to show AV killing an undead immortal. Just as you couldn't show Fiend Fyre burning away sand. Just as you couldn't show Crucio working on the undead. All empty claims.

Except the The Mummy, which you don't remember.

And the expected "you're a fanboy" response when you're at your wits end. Seems people are fanboys of whatever they crush you with 🙂 The Mummy fanboys, how desperate 😂

I remember the days when HP magic had me under it's spell......See what I did there?

Originally posted by quanchi112
We see once his soul is taken away this is true.

1. Imhotep was cursed and specific magic can take away his immortality via his soul. We see his soul clearly taken back to the underworld which renders him mortal. Her soul needed to be called back since she died but due to Imhoteps curse it was different.

2. It's function is death or killing but it's talked about in the films. When the curse rebounded Voldemort's soul latched itself onto Harry creating an unintentional Horcrux. When Voldemort hit Harry later on it killed the horcrux in Harry aka Vodemort's soul. When we see it hit Sirius we see his soul exit so I'm 100 percent correct.

3. The first 2 were correct so yeah I'm still right.

No we see you assuming that was his soul.

1. We see in this franchise what souls look like and what was taken from him looked completely different. His soul was brought back as well seeing as how he was dead for thousands of years so his soul leaving would look like hers, yet it did not. And you completely skipped the fact that in this franchise it is proven that without a soul you die yet when Tep’s immortality was taken he did not die. So how was it connected to his soul?

2. Do you recall how a Horcrux is made? When you murder someone part of your own soul is torn apart and you can attach that torn part onto something right? Well he had just killed Harry’s mother resulting in the tearing of his soul and when the spell rebounded, “killing” Voldemort’s body, that torn part attached itself to Harry creating an unintended Horcrux. The spell itself did not affect the soul just the body. Later Voldemort hits Harry with the curse and it destroys the Horcrux, which is part of Vodlemort living in Harry. One killing curse kills one thing and it killed that piece of Mort. We see Sirius’ soul leave due to the fact he was dead. When you die your soul leaves your body, and the curse makes people die. It does not target the soul.

3. The 1st two are still wrong and therefore so is this

Originally posted by The Fat Rambo
I remember the days when HP magic had me under it's spell......See what I did there?

Yeah i did.....being a troll.

Originally posted by The Fat Rambo
I remember the days when HP magic had me under it's spell......See what I did there?

Originally posted by Robtard
FFS, clowning and dodging, here you go again:

As a horcrux. You don't even know the subtleties your own favorite franchise.

False claims of victory. Another of your clown tactics. 🙂

You've have yet to show AV killing an undead immortal. Just as you couldn't show Fiend Fyre burning away sand. Just as you couldn't show Crucio working on the undead. All empty claims.

Except the The Mummy, which you don't remember.

And the expected "you're a fanboy" response when you're at your wits end. Seems people are fanboys of whatever they crush you with 🙂 The Mummy fanboys, how desperate 😂

I won the moment you acknowledged specific magic works.

I don't need to since Imhotep has no resistance feats. Your responses are nuh uh. The Mummy at full power is an immortal. Ability to live forever. That's the definition not unkillable.

You don't even understand your own points and I have yet to see you win a single debate. One can dream.

Originally posted by juggerman
No we see you assuming that was his soul.

1. We see in this franchise what souls look like and what was taken from him looked completely different. His soul was brought back as well seeing as how he was dead for thousands of years so his soul leaving would look like hers, yet it did not. And you completely skipped the fact that in this franchise it is proven that without a soul you die yet when Tep’s immortality was taken he did not die. So how was it connected to his soul?

2. Do you recall how a Horcrux is made? When you murder someone part of your own soul is torn apart and you can attach that torn part onto something right? Well he had just killed Harry’s mother resulting in the tearing of his soul and when the spell rebounded, “killing” Voldemort’s body, that torn part attached itself to Harry creating an unintended Horcrux. The spell itself did not affect the soul just the body. Later Voldemort hits Harry with the curse and it destroys the Horcrux, which is part of Vodlemort living in Harry. One killing curse kills one thing and it killed that piece of Mort. We see Sirius’ soul leave due to the fact he was dead. When you die your soul leaves your body, and the curse makes people die. It does not target the soul.

3. The 1st two are still wrong and therefore so is this

1. The reason he doesn't die when his soul is taken is simple. That's what is connected to his immortality so that was taken not his life. That simply makes him mortal since the only part of anyone that is immortal on its own is its soul outside weird exceptions.

2. Wrong. It attacks both. Every time you kill someone a Horcrux isn't created. Due to the odd circumstances of the sacrifice and it rebounding onto himself this created one. Other than that you need to perform certain dark magic to create one. The killing curse attacked Voldemort's soul that was in Harry. In the Potterverse you can take a soul without killing someone thus proving my point ala Dementors kiss. I'm so ****ing good. 💃

3. I'm right. In Potterverse you can survive and live minus a soul. The av does both. It causes exit of soul and death.

Consider yourself served.