Imhotep vs Voldemort · Movie Versus Forum

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
You mean the [b]unprotected human that dies to cast the love charm?
Oh, so it throws people backward and shit without any physical force?
So you think AK could kill CB Hulk?
That isn't a feat, it's a useless rationalization. No feat = no killing immortals. [/B]

She uses a protective charm but still has to die for it to work.

It doesn't damage and without life the bodies don't remain still.

Movie forum so ask relevant questions.

You need to watch the films. Please quit embarrassing yourself.

ScreamPaste Carpe Noctem

Which proves nothing since she herself is unprotected.

Last I checked dying didn't make you spring backward.

It is a relevant question. Do you think *movie* AK could kill CB Hulk? Yes/No question.

There's not one instance of AK killing an immortal, so it cannot.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Which proves nothing since she herself is unprotected.
Last I checked dying didn't make you spring backward.
It is a relevant question. Do you think *movie* AK could kill CB Hulk? Yes/No question.
There's not one instance of AK killing an immortal, so it cannot.

Proves you can't save yourself if you are hit despite the charms. Dying isn't dying by magic. 😂

No, movie forum so it is irrelevant.

Yes, there is. You just have no idea.

ScreamPaste Carpe Noctem

It proves that AK can kill someone defenseless, and not someone with defense. Herp.

Then you refuse to discuss the limitations of AK, and are using a no limit fallacy.

Prove it.

Bentley Seitei

Originally posted by quanchi112
here only works against mortal weapons.

That's your assumption but by the same token we can say AK only works against mortals.

juggerman Senior Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
Both the movie and writer of the story agree he is so disprove it.
Context. Imhotepmlost easily.
Yes.
Not at all. Voldemort wins.

Already done.

Lost?

No.

Voldemort gets stomped

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Bentley
That's your assumption but by the same token we can say AK only works against mortals.

No, as it has worked against an immortal. I mean come on if its your claim it won't here prove it.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
It proves that AK can kill someone defenseless, and [b]not someone with defense. Herp.
Then you refuse to discuss the limitations of AK, and are using a no limit fallacy.
Prove it. [/B]

They aren't defenseless aka magic. Kills even someone who uses a counter charm for it.

No, someone needs magical resistance to specific magic which Imhotep and Ganondorf both don't have.

Your claim so you prove it.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by juggerman
Already done.
Lost?
No.
Voldemort gets stomped

No, your nuh uhs aren't proof.

You are.

Yes.

Voldemort wins with a single spell. No magical resistance.

juggerman Senior Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, your nuh uhs aren't proof.
You are.
Yes.
Voldemort wins with a single spell. No magical resistance.

Proof is in the movies

You wish

No

Single spell is mortal weapon. He loses hard

Bentley Seitei

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, as it has worked against an immortal.

In the same way a bullet would've worked awesr

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Bentley
In the same way a bullet would've worked awesr

No, magic works against Imhotep and a bullet doesn't kill you every single time it hits you no matter where it hits you.

juggerman Senior Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, magic works against Imhotep and a bullet doesn't kill you every single time it hits you no matter where it hits you.

But a head shot could have killed all the people the AV killed.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by juggerman
But a head shot could have killed all the people the AV killed.

A bullet needs to be aimed at a certain part of the body whereas the Ak kills you no matter what every time. People survive head shots too. Destroys your case.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by juggerman
Proof is in the movies
You wish
No
Single spell is mortal weapon. He loses hard

Proof of what ?

You are a fool.

Yes.

No, magic works. Mortals even crush Imhotep using magic. Voldemort wins.

juggerman Senior Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
A bullet needs to be aimed at a certain part of the body whereas the Ak kills you no matter what every time. People survive head shots too. Destroys your case.

No at all. My case is not that a bullet kills in the exact same way as this spell does smart guy. These people killed by this spell could have also been killed by a bullet to the head.

juggerman Senior Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
Proof of what ?
You are a fool.
Yes.
No, magic works. Mortals even crush Imhotep using magic. Voldemort wins.

You're stupidity. Oh and that Vold is mortal

Then you are bested by a fool.

No

Mortals beat Voldemort 😄

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by juggerman
No at all. My case is not that a bullet kills in the exact same way as this spell does smart guy. These people killed by this spell could have also been killed by a bullet to the head.

There is more than one way to kill you idiot. Bullet doesn't kill the same way as its a durability attack and you can survive. Completely different than a magical attack which kills you one shot every time.

juggerman Senior Member

Originally posted by quanchi112
There is more than one way to kill you idiot. Bullet doesn't kill the same way as its a durability attack and you can survive. Completely different than a magical attack which kills you one shot every time.

Except when it doesn't?

ScreamPaste Carpe Noctem

Originally posted by quanchi112
They aren't defenseless aka magic. Kills even someone who uses a counter charm for it.
No, someone needs magical resistance to specific magic which Imhotep and Ganondorf both don't have.
Your claim so you prove it.

And yet it's only ever killed them when they were defenseless.

I lol'd. 'Specific magic' is some nonsense you thought up to support your no limits fallacy.

No, it really is not. You have claimed that AK could kill Emotep. You have not proven it.