Originally posted by quanchi112
Scroll down to the bottom of the entry. Goyle created the spell in the movie and the diadem was destroyed and then tossed into the room.😂
Now I realize why you're so against Harry Potter. You don't know any better.
Oh my. Goyle replaced Crabbe in the film. I. With a few other minor changes, like Harry sensing the diadem instead of seeing it. t's the same otherwise
Still dodging. It's all you have.
Originally posted by RobtardIt was destroyed prior to it being tossed into the room. You're a fool. Honestly, but you're ignorant so you don't know any better.
Oh my. Goyle replaced Crabbe in the film. It's the same otherwise. With a few minor changes, like Harry sensing the diadem instead of seeing it.Still dodging. It's all you have.
Yup. You're wrong again. It was damaged some by Harry's smashing (4:27-) and then destroyed in the Fiend Fyre.
How embarrassing for you. 😂
Now either list these "greater resistance feats" or STFU already.
Originally posted by RobtardYou keep embarrassing yourself. It was already destroyed by the Basilisk fang and can see his soul escaping. That's what morphs into Fiendfyre. We see crazy things happen when Horcruxes are destroyed. Basilisk fang destroyed it. You first were ignorant and then didn't understand the scene. You're awful.
Yup. You're wrong again. It was damaged some by Harry's smashing and then destroyed in the Fiend Fyre.How embarrassing for you. 😂
Now either list these "greater resistance feats" or STFU already.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You keep embarrassing yourself. It was already destroyed by the Basilisk fang and can see his soul escaping. That's what morphs into Fiendfyre. We see crazy things happen when Horcruxes are destroyed. Basilisk fang destroyed it. You first were ignorant and then didn't understand the scene. You're awful.
😂 desperately flailing your arms around now like a panicked drowning man. The film clip > you. The film clip even coincides with the original source material as added support.
Damaged some is not destroyed, chip. Here's the still of the horcrux being utterly destroyed in the Fiend Fyre, not before:
Cry more.
Now either list these "greater resistance feats" or STFU already.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You keep embarrassing yourself. It was already destroyed by the Basilisk fang and can see his soul escaping. That's what morphs into Fiendfyre. We see crazy things happen when Horcruxes are destroyed. Basilisk fang destroyed it. You first were ignorant and then didn't understand the scene. You're awful.
Quanchi, if you are going to use the information that I put out there, at least get it right. AND don't call me names when I present that information. I happen to PAY attention to the little things. Like the actor who played Crabbe was busted for drug use, so was in only the first two movies. Which is why he wasn't the one who cast the FiendFyre in Deathly Hallows Part 2.
I don't claim to be as knowledgeable about LotR, as that would make my brain burst. But I do know this - Lore is lore. It's the thing that can't change without making a story look and feel less than half-assed. In LotR, the LORE says that the One Ring cannot be destroyed EXCEPT for being chucked into Mount Doom, where it was made.
In Harry Potter lore, the Sword of Gryffindor is one pretty damn badass weapon. But it's not made out of anything that involves Mount Doom.
This is more complicated that HP ROX! and LOTR IS DUM. If you want to debate effectively, do your research and don't just flop around with a party motto.
Originally posted by RobtardYou misinterpreted the film clip you had to look up because you thought it was Hermione. No, it was destroyed just like when Hermione destroyed the previous one. The water went out of whack because that's what happens when Horcruxes are destroyed. The basilisk fang destroyed it. Then just as the water went nuts the soul in this case came into contact with fire. Critical thinking you goon.
😂 desperately flailing your arms around now like a panicked drowning man. The film clip > you. The film clip even coincides with the original source material as added support.Damaged some is not destroyed, chip. Here's the still of the horcrux being utterly destroyed in the Fiend Fyre, not before:
Cry more.
Now either list these "greater resistance feats" or STFU already.
You're busy clinging to Wikipedia and citing book feats.
I'm smart you aren't. I'm knowledgeable you're ignorant. We all have out part to play in the game of life my ignorant friend.
Originally posted by siriuswriterWho cares why. Goyle cast it so please don't lost your head over it.
Quanchi, if you are going to use the information that I put out there, at least get it right. AND don't call me names when I present that information. I happen to PAY attention to the little things. Like the actor who played Crabbe was busted for drug use, so was in only the first two movies. Which is why he wasn't the one who cast the FiendFyre in Deathly Hallows Part 2.I don't claim to be as knowledgeable about LotR, as that would make my brain burst. But I do know this - Lore is lore. It's the thing that can't change without making a story look and feel less than half-assed. In LotR, the LORE says that the One Ring cannot be destroyed EXCEPT for being chucked into Mount Doom, where it was made.
In Harry Potter lore, the Sword of Gryffindor is one pretty damn badass weapon. But it's not made out of anything that involves Mount Doom.
This is more complicated that HP ROX! and LOTR IS DUM. If you want to debate effectively, do your research and don't just flop around with a party motto.
Lore only applies to the fictional universe it takes place in otherwise no force from any other movie can destroy the ring according to your no limits fallacy nonsense.
The sword of Gryffindor doesn't exist in Lotr lore so again your opinion or thesis is flawed. Aren't you some kind of writer ? This is common sense or so I thought.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You misinterpreted the film clip you had to look up because you thought it was Hermione. No, it was destroyed just like when Hermione destroyed the previous one. The water went out of whack because that's what happens when Horcruxes are destroyed. The basilisk fang destroyed it. Then just as the water went nuts the soul in this case came into contact with fire. Critical thinking you goon.You're busy clinging to Wikipedia and citing book feats.
I'm smart you aren't. I'm knowledgeable you're ignorant. We all have out part to play in the game of life my ignorant friend.
Stop making shit up. Potter damaged it, it was destroyed when it went into the fire. The Clip > your wankery.
You're busy making up lies. Watch the damn clip.
More posturing and yapping when you know you've been bested. You were wrong, the clip proves it. Accept and move on.
The funny thing, even if we go with your Quanchi version, a man-boy beaking them with a basilisk tooth isn't much of a durability feat. So you still can't support your "greater resistance feats" claim for the Horcrux. 😂
Originally posted by RobtardYou're too stupid to understand the clip. What do Horcruxes do ? Anchor souls into objects. The soul was leaving aka was destroyed and simply ran into the fire. By your logic the first Basilisk only damaged it and the water finished it off.
Stop making shit up. Potter damaged it, it was destroyed when it went into the fire. The Clip > your wankery.You're busy making up lies.
More posturing and yapping when you know you've been bested. You were wrong, the clip proves it. Accept and move on.
The funny thing, even if we go with your Quanchi version, a man-boy beaking them with a basilisk tooth isn't much of a durability feat. So you still lose and can't show "greater resistance feats" for the Horcrux. 😂
😂
You're not intelligent enough to understand a clip. A basilisk is powerful more so than a dwarf axe. Looks like based off of feats Pottermagic is greater than dwarf axe. I win again.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You're too stupid to understand the clip. What do Horcruxes do ? Anchor souls into objects. The soul was leaving aka was destroyed and simply ran into the fire. By your logic the first Basilisk only damaged it and the water finished it off.😂
You're not intelligent enough to understand a clip. A basilisk is powerful more so than a dwarf axe. Looks like based off of feats Pottermagic is greater than dwarf axe. I win again.
Well according to you, Horcrux are souls 😂
Originally posted by quanchi112
A Horcrux is the soul. Key word here being soul.
I had to correct you and let you know that Horcruxs are vessels for souls/parts of souls. Still trying to act like you knew all along.
😂 Yeah. Basilisk are so powerful that a second year student kept one at bay and then killed it by waving a sword around like a spastic child:
Gimli would WTFPWN it with the SoG and not break a sweat.
But I do like how you ignore the volcano and try to focus on Gimli. Lets me know you know you don't have a proper argument. But considering Gimli's powerful blow didn't even scratch the ring, let alone move it, it tells us it's powerful as per LoTR Lore, which crushes you night and day. LoTR Lore > You.