Surfer/Thor vs HP Doomsday

Started by JakeTheBank7 pages
Originally posted by Starscream M
no jake, at their respective bests, its still the same story.

At their best portrayals, they would win given the scope of their feats.

At their average or lower portrayals, Doomsday would run through them.

Originally posted by leonidas
dd wins. i don't see anyway for them to put him down tbh. gb or no. the only way is bfr which is an option for either. staying and fighting it out both would die, like superman and waverider would have.
jakethebank begs to differ 😐

Originally posted by Starscream M
jakethebank begs to differ 😐

and, though i disagree, that's his prerogative.

Originally posted by Starscream M
yah, unless you were just trolling? 😕
I wasn't trolling, but what is with the attitude?

It is true Thor can't just instant Godblast(as far as I know anyway) but he isn't fighting Doomsday alone. Surfer is also in the fight and he can definitely distract DD long enough.

Besides I did say Doomsday most likely wins, so what gives?

Originally posted by Starscream M
jakethebank begs to differ 😐

That's my opinion and Leo is certainly entitled to his. Doesn't mean I can't be cordial to him and vice versa.

Originally posted by Zack Fair
I wasn't trolling, but what is with the attitude?

It is true Thor can't just instant Godblast(as far as I know anyway) but he isn't fighting Doomsday alone. Surfer is also in the fight and he can definitely distract DD long enough.

Besides I did say Doomsday most likely wins, so what gives?

You'll have to forgive Bruce. He has a condition.

Anyway, Thor's Godblast isn't some slow charging attack. He can - and has - release that energy from Mjolnir instantly as fast as any other attack.

👆

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
That's my opinion and Leo is certainly entitled to his. Doesn't mean I can't be cordial to him and vice versa.

it pains me a little that that even needs to be said.....some things are/should be just understood.

Originally posted by leonidas
it pains me a little that that even needs to be said.....some things are/should be just understood.

Yeah, I know what you mean.

These is this weird trend Thor loyalist just say GOD BLAST. I Guess Superman just uses the same ability like he did on DS all day in every fight.

Originally posted by leonidas
dd wins. i don't see anyway for them to put him down tbh. gb or no. the only way is bfr which is an option for either. staying and fighting it out both would die, like superman and waverider would have.
thor would have done better than superman w/gear did, and waverider really didn't do shit but provide exposition during the fight.
superman's idea of versatility during that fight was a little more heat vision, but inevitably he went back to his bread and butter and got stomped out, and that's even after starting off saying he shouldn't fight him straight up.

Originally posted by xJLxKing
These is this weird trend Thor loyalist just say GOD BLAST. I Guess Superman just uses the same ability like he did on DS all day in every fight.

Whats the problem with mentioning a powerful attack Thor has used several times? An attack that has hurt beings superior to Doomsday and will be useful/needed against this particular opponent. No one is saying Thor will open with the godblast nor that he will go for it 10 times out of 10 fights. However the godblast is to be noted.

Originally posted by Zack Fair

Whats the problem with mentioning a powerful attack Thor has used several times? An attack that has hurt beings superior to Doomsday and will be useful/needed against this particular opponent. No one is saying Thor will open with the godblast nor that he will go for it 10 times out of 10 fights. However the godblast is to be noted.

How many times has he used it in his history of what 60 years?

Enough to be considered a viable IC option when push comes to shove? But I ain't no Thorbag, so I'll let the Thor corps answer that.

Just to clarify... Thorbag - any Thor fan who hasnt given up on Thor after all he's been through over the last few months? Im asking because this term popped up quite recently.

Hm, that does make me curious... When was the last time Thor used an actual Godblast?

Originally posted by SamZED
Just to clarify... Thorbag - any Thor fan who hasnt given up on Thor after all he's been through over the last few months? Im asking because this term popped up quite recently.

Where you been Sam? The term Thorbag has been around for at least a couple years. Definitions may vary tho.

For this thread:
Surfer gets the same thing Radiant got.
Thor gets the same thing Superman got.
Not looking too good for the team.

Originally posted by Galan007
Hm, that does make me curious... When was the last time Thor used an actual Godblast?

When he crippled Zelia.

In 1999.

However he mentioned it much more recently in Astonishing Thor

and there are arguments going around that he may have used it against Galactus in his annual, though I disagree that it was a godblast

Originally posted by SamZED
Just to clarify... Thorbag - any Thor fan who hasnt given up on Thor after all he's been through over the last few months? Im asking because this term popped up quite recently.

Thor hasn't really had any terrible low showings lately...he's been treated a lot better than he was in 2012

The very recent scan from AT solidifies it for me. A Godblast should still be considered 'in character' for Thor.

Originally posted by Galan007
The very recent scan from AT solidifies it for me. A Godblast should still be considered 'in character' for Thor.
it is.

my problem isn't that thor isn't likely to use it, its that it is not a valid mean of attack against a speedy opponent.

thor has pretty much only used the godblast against stationary opponents, never one in motion, as he has to charge it up

And the last time Thor used it was last year in Thor Annual 2012 against Scier, Galactus and the Other.

Thor used a God blast on speedster n Gladiator, and it jacked Gladiator up.