Batman vs. Link

Started by quanchi11243 pages

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Lol.

Link shows without question that he is super durable, Quan ignores it.

Not in the current continuity Batman hasn't. Oh, but you don't read what people type, I forgot. Also even in the older continuity when Batman did it was purely PIS, and everyone in Comic V.S. knows it.

No, just because he survives that doesn't mean axes can't hurt him. Gameplay makes it clear the axe hurts him.

Batman has been doing it for years. Pis is an excuse fanboys use to ignore something they didn't like.

Gameplay is noncanon.

PIS is when something stupid happens to further the plot. Batman's current continuity isn't 'years' old.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Gameplay is noncanon.

PIS is when something stupid happens to further the plot. Batman's current continuity isn't 'years' old.

It is canon and shows what can hurt him.

So you want to ignore Batmans history. Figures nothing counts but what you say counts. Lol.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It is canon and shows what can hurt him.

So you want to ignore Batmans history. Figures nothing counts but what you say counts. Lol.


Gameplay is and always has been noncanon.

Read the OP. New 52.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Gameplay is and always has been noncanon.

Read the OP. New 52.

Batman as do the lanterns have parts of their history still in continuity.

Gameplay demonstrates what hurts him. A part of the game. You want to ignore everything.

Gameplay exists to be played. It's non canon.

And yet he gets crushed.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Gameplay exists to be played. It's non canon.

And yet he gets crushed.

Demonstrates what can hurt him.

No, only you and a few Zelda zealots feel this way. Batman wins and easily.

Non-canon.

I lol'd. Calling Blood Rain a Zelda zealot, now?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Non-canon.

I lol'd. Calling Blood Rain a Zelda zealot, now?

False. The cutscenes are canon but the in between stuff is up to the player. Different possibilities.

Anyone who decides who wins despite no knowledge no the opposition is a zealot.

Gameplay mechanics are non-canon. The in between stuff that is optional is non-canon.

So you're a zealot.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Gameplay mechanics are non-canon. The in between stuff that is optional is non-canon.

So you're a zealot.

So Ganondorf dodging arrows is no canon from this game according to you. Your premise that axes can't hurt Link is ridiculous as well and hasn't been proven.

I played through the game. I am knowledgeable whereas the lot of the video game versus decides their matchup before even knowing about the other character which is the definition of bias.

That's not a mechanic. mariofacepalm There's a cutscene of Link being unhurt by an axe to the face. Get over it.

That's funny, BR always does research before he decides who he thinks wins. Unlike you, who managed to play through TP without actually noticing anything that happened.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
That's not a mechanic. mariofacepalm There's a cutscene of Link being unhurt by an axe to the face. Get over it.

That's funny, BR always does research before he decides who he thinks wins. Unlike you, who managed to play through TP without actually noticing anything that happened.

Yes, which means axes all don't necessarily kill him not that he is immune to axes.

Br always begs for information even regarding short movies. He says things out of ignorance. His research is always hilarious since fiction doesn't adhere to laws of reality.

It means that Link is durable enough to take an axe from a class 10+ character without harm, showing an increase in his durability, and preventing a sub class 5 without a weapon from hurting him at all.

BR likes to learn, you like to spout nonsense.

>Goes into Zant vs Queen thread
>Researches Queen
>Says Zants feats are better so far
>Askes for Queens feats to draw opinion
>Yet to say who wins the thread

A smart person gathers info first, Q-man :T

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
It [b]means that Link is durable enough to take an axe from a class 10+ character without harm, showing an increase in his durability, and preventing a sub class 5 without a weapon from hurting him at all.

BR likes to learn, you like to spout nonsense. [/B]

It just shows he can survive an axe hit. Axe can still hurt him just like a fist can shrugged off but that doesn't mean all punches can't hurt someone.

Originally posted by BloodRain
>Goes into Zant vs Queen thread
>Researches Queen
>Says Zants feats are better so far
>Askes for Queens feats to draw opinion
>Yet to say who wins the thread

A smart person gathers info first, Q-man :T

A smart person watches the movie about a thread over a movie character.

I mean for crying out loud.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It just shows he can survive an axe hit. Axe can still hurt him just like a fist can shrugged off but that doesn't mean all punches can't hurt someone.

Shows he can take an axe blow form a superhuman like it isn't even a thing. Link took a punch from GSP without issue. An infant punching him is not going to hurt him.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Shows he can take an axe blow form a superhuman like it isn't even a thing. Link took a punch from GSP without issue. An infant punching him is not going to hurt him.
No, it shows he can survive not that an axe can't hurt him. He was prepared and didn't take it directly like a sucker punch. An infant punching him won't hurt him but an infant can stab through his skin.

It shows that an axe with several tons of strength behind it didn't, and therefore that an axe without several tons of strength behind it cannot. Simple.