Originally posted by quanchi112
Thats why strength, angle of attack, etc. are factored in. You want to ignore low showings altogether.
If Bulbin knocks around a Bullbo a second before doing so to Link, with the intention to kill, then the same strength was used unless something is to state otherwise.
And its not ignoring low showings, its accepting that they happened pre-Triforce. They get stronger as well as more durable, even if you chose to ignore the latter.
Originally posted by BloodRainBaseless claim. Link resisted one and kod in another. Both are canon. You are biased and ignore showings. That's biased behavior.
I suppose we are to do this with all feats then? Act like the angle and strength that may have been used all deter from the facts we know?If Bulbin knocks around a Bullbo a second before doing so to Link, with the intention to kill, then the same strength was used unless something is to state otherwise.
And its not ignoring low showings, its accepting that they happened pre-Triforce. They get stronger as well as more durable, even if you chose to ignore the latter.
Originally posted by quanchi112You're late with my sandwich, you're fired.
I will feed you tomorrow.
Originally posted by quanchi112You already conceded this point, why argue it with BR?
Baseless claim. Link resisted one and kod in another. Both are canon. You are biased and ignore showings. That's biased behavior.
Originally posted by ScreamPasteNo, I used what I needed as wimps kod him. Batman is stored than wimps.
What's it like in the land of Make Believe?You made an argument you could not support. You failed to provide any evidence of your nonsense claims, and as a result, the established class 100 character wrecks the peak human with ease.
Batman>wimps>Link.