Batman vs. Link

Originally posted by quanchi112
Baseless claim. Link resisted one and kod in another. Both are canon. You are biased and ignore showings. That's biased behavior.

All that post was was a summery of what we see 😛 Yes, Link pre-ToC was knocked out. Link post-ToC takes more. This is accepting both feats.. the only person ignoring things is you with King Bulbin.

Funny how you will admit that the TF makes the user stronger (which can be proven) but will refuse that it makes them more durable (which can also be proven).

Originally posted by BloodRain
Lol first thing I saw was "You're biased! That's biased! Everyone's biased!" And for some reason in a faded French accent.. Hmm...

All that post was was a summery of what we see 😛 Yes, Link pre-ToC was knocked out. Link post-ToC takes more. This is accepting both feats.. the only person ignoring things is you with King Bulbin.

Funny how you will admit that the TF makes the user stronger (which can be proven) but will refuse that it makes them more durable (which can also be proven).

It's canon that the HS says he got Stronger before he took an axe to the face.
So canon.
Pre adventure link <bulbin < king bulbin < post adventure link.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
It's canon that the HS says he got Stronger before he took an axe to the face.
So canon.
Pre adventure link <bulbin < king bulbin < post adventure link.

And we haven't even seen a single feat for Batman yet, Quan.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, it can't. Both are canon and you are just speculating due to bias. Canon, deal with it.

"Funny how you will admit that the TF makes the user stronger (which can be proven) but will refuse that it makes them more durable (which can also be proven)."

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
It's canon that the HS says he got Stronger before he took an axe to the face.
So canon.
Pre adventure link <bulbin < king bulbin < post adventure link.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
^

And we haven't even seen a single feat for Batman yet, Quan.

Originally posted by BloodRain
Cool, so tanking King Bulbin's axe to the face is canon?

"Funny how you will admit that the TF makes the user stronger (which can be proven) but will refuse that it makes them more durable (which can also be proven)."

What do you mean by Tf ?

TRIFORCE. Tri-Force. Tf. Triforce.
An exlink said he was weak, then said he was improving, then said he was much stronger. You can make the argument that his strength isn't linked to his durability, but pretending he doesn't get stronger is not an option (keep in mind all hero's shade training is strictly sword and shield. Gear is a nonfactor.)

That's some pretty denial ridden shit, Quan. You're going to claim Link did not get stronger or more powerful during his adventure in the same post you claim not to ignore evidence in? haermm Whatever man.

Still no feats for Batman. Bats still loses.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
TRIFORCE. Tri-Force. Tf. Triforce.
An exlink said he was weak, then said he was improving, then said he was much stronger. You can make the argument that his strength isn't linked to his durability, but pretending he doesn't get stronger is not an option (keep in mind all hero's shade training is strictly sword and shield. Gear is a nonfactor.)

Gear is a factor. If he got stronger he wouldn't need the gear.

Originally posted by quanchi112
top amped Dorfs strength and resistance not his durability. Toc doesn't IMO after reflecting just his courage.

Gear is a factor. If he got stronger he wouldn't need the gear.

Except he doesn't use gear when he's training with the hero's shade. (The guy who made the comment)

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Good thing your opinion isn't worth shit and the game flat out tells us and illustrates the changes in question. Durability changes.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Except he doesn't use gear when he's training with the hero's shade. (The guy who made the comment)

Originally posted by quanchi112
Relax. You are just mad it isn't canon.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, but his words aren't meant to be taken literally.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I'm not even mad, bro. I'm telling you how it is, Aonuma > you. I lol'd. Prove this, please prove this.

The same manner in which Voldemort is referred to as too strong. Too formidable or powerful to be beaten not literal,strength. The shade explicitly taught skill not some freakish strength you make believe is the case.

They mean what they say, and I think they mean what they say. The manga is part of HH, which you cannot argue with. And HH is either canon or not, but you don't get to pick and choose. Though in your shoes I'd understand if you back pedal like all **** and pretend you never picked the book up in the first place, since you're a coward that way.

The Shade comments on Link's growing power, not his growing skill, he passes on his skill, he has no need to comment on that.

Also, concession accepted. (You failed to provide a feat for Batman again.)

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
They mean what they say, and I think they mean what they say. The manga is part of HH, which you cannot argue with. And HH is either canon or not, but you don't get to pick and choose. Though in your shoes I'd understand if you back pedal like all **** and pretend you never picked the book up in the first place, since you're a coward that way.

The Shade comments on Link's growing power, not his growing skill, he passes on his skill, he has no need to comment on that.

Also, concession accepted. (You failed to provide a feat for Batman again.)

Growing power through skill not literal strength. M

Batman already wins. No need to embarrass Link any further.

It's been proven, you can deny it, but you'll be wrong and look stupid.

Growing power is explicit. His feats show his growing strength AND durability.

Batman can't win without a feat to rival Link's own, you've not even proven Batman is stronger than a mook. Concession. Accepted.