Batman vs. Link

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
So you admit you haven't posted a feat. Good.

I'm not derailing, I'm waiting for you to post evidence. You repeating yourself is boring. So yeah, talk about something with me until you gather the balls to post a single feat.

Batman wins.

You haven't supported the idea that Batman wins though, you've made no argument for him, you've just claimed he wins over and over without evidence.

Rainbow Dash is best horse.

the bat has over fifty years of history to at least inspire an argument. Give it a try and see how it goes.

... Rarity is best

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
the bat has over fifty years of history to at least inspire an argument. Give it a try and see how it goes.

... Rarity is best

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
You haven't supported the idea that Batman wins though, you've made no argument for him, you've just claimed he wins over and over without evidence.

Rainbow Dash is best horse.

I lol'd. Your behaviour is your own. You do not get to make excuses for it. You provided no evidence.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I lol'd. Your behaviour is your own. You do not get to make excuses for it. You provided no evidence.

Repeat repeat repeat. Concession accepted.

I genuinely want a reasonable debate from you. You seem like a smart (opinionated) guy. I know you don't think highly of link, but as he shares several similarities with batman. I just want to hear an honest supported opinion.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Repeat repeat repeat. Concession accepted.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
I genuinely want a reasonable debate from you. You seem like a smart (opinionated) guy. I know you don't think highly of link, but as he shares several similarities with batman. I just want to hear an honest supported opinion.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You conceded again. Lol.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
That's odd since I'm not the one making claims without backing them. Link is too durable for Batman to hurt him. (Backed claim.) Therefore he wins. (Backed claim)

Originally posted by quanchi112
Bulbins men easily kod him. Batman wins.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Prove Batman is as strong as they are, then I'll prove to you why it's irrelevant and we can get to an actual discussion.

Excuses, Quan, excuses. I accept your concession.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Excuses, Quan, excuses. I accept your concession.

Ok, but elaborate. We already established link is at least marginally stronger than he was at that point as well as the bulbins possibility for super strength. His batman physically stronger, more skilled, better armed. We also need to take into account that link was not combat experienced and taken by surprise. Do you think batman can duplicate the surprise element due to ninja training? And how do the combatants measure up mentally? Batman is the world's greatest detective, but link is famous for being a puzzle solver who is excellent at finding weakpoints. They seem pretty even(minus link's super strength), so what gives batman the edge?

Originally posted by quanchi112
You conceded again.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
You can claim that everytime I point out why you lose but it won't help you. Provide evidence or stfu.