Wolverine vs Link

Started by quanchi11241 pages

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Illiteracy.
That was mean to say about scenario.

Originally posted by quanchi112
That was mean to say about scenario.

Hurr, durr, what is this, kindergarten?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Hurr, durr, what is this, kindergarten?
Leave him alone.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Leave him alone.
Never made it to first grade, didja, Quan?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Never made it to first grade, didja, Quan?
So there's a typo because this post was intended for scenario though you said Quan.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So there's a typo because this post was intended for scenario though you said Quan.
Behold, gentlemen, the pinnacle of immaturity.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Behold, gentlemen, the pinnacle of immaturity.
You are quite immature. I agree.

Originally posted by quanchi112
To,me it's keeping with the times. You need to adapt to technology and the LOZ has not.

I understand where you're coming from, but voice acting makes games more expensive for something that it's pretty much unneeded. Again, this is not a justification, Zelda games are blockbusters and they could pay such features.

I do think that silent heros do have some charm, but you can always use voice acting somewhere else.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Gameplay is the same with dungeons, puzzles, bosses and saving the princess.

That's the risk when you have a long running series, personally I see how that gameplay can be seen as stagnant, but most of its fans seem to think the games remain somewhat good. I personally cherish the old games the most because the genius in those is much more evident.

Originally posted by Bentley
I understand where you're coming from, but voice acting makes games more expensive for something that it's pretty much unneeded. Again, this is not a justification, Zelda games are blockbusters and they could pay such features.

I do think that silent heros do have some charm, but you can always use voice acting somewhere else.

That's the risk when you have a long running series, personally I see how that gameplay can be seen as stagnant, but most of its fans seem to think the games remain somewhat good. I personally cherish the old games the most because the genius in those is much more evident.

It's repetitive and stale to me. I also don't find it very mature and tend to gravitate towards the adult violence as opposed to kiddie Link.

Originally posted by Bentley
I understand where you're coming from, but voice acting makes games more expensive for something that it's pretty much unneeded. Again, this is not a justification, Zelda games are blockbusters and they could pay such features.

I do think that silent heros do have some charm, but you can always use voice acting somewhere else.

That's the risk when you have a long running series, personally I see how that gameplay can be seen as stagnant, but most of its fans seem to think the games remain somewhat good. I personally cherish the old games the most because the genius in those is much more evident.

I personally prefer Zelda games without voice acting, a lot of moments in games have been ruined for me by poor voice acting. (Sky Rim's finale being a big one, my God.)

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I personally prefer Zelda games without voice acting, a lot of moments in games have been ruined for me by poor voice acting. (Sky Rim's finale being a big one, my God.)
Wow. You're terrible.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Wow. You're terrible.
Am I? Did you like the voice acting at the end of Sky Rim?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Am I? Did you like the voice acting at the end of Sky Rim?
I didn't play skyrim. I'm responding to you saying you don't want voice acting of Zelda.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I didn't play skyrim. I'm responding to you saying you don't want voice acting of Zelda.

Zelda's style works exceptionally well without it. shrug The characters are so expressive that if you threw in voice acting you'd actually need to tone them down or it wouldn't come across right.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Zelda's style works exceptionally well without it. shrug The characters are so expressive that if you threw in voice acting you'd actually need to tone them down or it wouldn't come across right.
No, it's stagnant and outdated. Nintendo will soon be a third party developer due to their shitty systems anyway.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Zelda's style works exceptionally well without it. shrug The characters are so expressive that if you threw in voice acting you'd actually need to tone them down or it wouldn't come across right.
👆

At first I hated on Nintendo for not using voice actors. Then I just stopped caring. Then I realized it hasn't hurt them and the games don't really need them.

But I agree with Quan about Nintendo always lagging behind.

Originally posted by Zack Fair
👆

At first I hated on Nintendo for not using voice actors. Then I just stopped caring. Then I realized it hasn't hurt them and the games don't really need them.

But I agree with Quan about Nintendo always lagging behind.

It would make the games better.

Matter of opinion.

Originally posted by Zack Fair
Matter of opinion.
True but my opinion carries more weight.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, it's stagnant and outdated. Nintendo will soon be a third party developer due to their shitty systems anyway.

He says as Sony hemorhages money at an unimaginable rate.