Originally posted by quanchi112Above his power without it, yes, but it was at the lowest it's ever been with it.
So his power didn't spike when supported by the top ?Not in tis game.
Doesn't have to to beat Ganondorf.
Sword sure wrecked him.
It is in this game.
And yes, Gandalf needs serious feats to compare to Fi.
The sword is more powerful than the Fused Shadows.
Originally posted by ScreamPasteSo that is a yes. Great.
Above his power without it, yes, but it was at the lowest it's ever been with it.It is in this game.
And yes, Gandalf needs serious feats to compare to Fi.
The sword is more powerful than the Fused Shadows.
Prove it.
Gandalf already has feats which prove he can hurt/kill Ganondorf.
Unproven. In the game it's clear the ms can disable or dispel Dorfs magic ie more effective not more powerful.
This obsession with everything has to do with power is silly.
Originally posted by quanchi112
So that is a yes. Great.Prove it.
Gandalf already has feats which prove he can hurt/kill Ganondorf.
Unproven. In the game it's clear the ms can disable or dispel Dorfs magic ie more effective not more powerful.
This obsession with everything has to do with power is silly.
That's the entire plot of Twilight Princess. haermm
No, he does not. He does not have destructive feats on the level of Midna, who failed to harm Ganondorf at all.
You just said a more powerful character than Gandalf can hurt Ganondorf. grats.
I'm sure you think feats are silly, too.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You are being silly.
Lightning charged is pretty obvious it's greater than am uncharged sword slash.
'pretty obvious' isn't proof, thats your opinion. Tell me exactly why: 'Lightning charged blade + human strength' >> 'Goddess charged anti-evil blade + superhuman strength'
Originally posted by BloodRainGandalf clearly has greater than human strength since we see him tanking attacks from the Balrog as well as surviving the fall.
And you're failing to provide an answer, again. Are you denying all of that or aren't you? Unquantifiable means the feat wont help here. If you're not denying it tell us how strong this makes him.'pretty obvious' isn't proof, thats your opinion. Tell me exactly why: 'Lightning charged blade + human strength' >> 'Goddess charged anti-evil blade + superhuman strength'
Gandalf wins.
Originally posted by ScreamPasteThis is tp only. 🙂
Ganon without ToP = 3. Ganon upon first gainin ToP = 4. Ganon once he's unlocked the power of the ToP = 9001.That's the entire plot of Twilight Princess. haermm
No, he does not. He does not have destructive feats on the level of Midna, who [b]failed
to harm Ganondorf at all.You just said a more powerful character than Gandalf can hurt Ganondorf. grats.
I'm sure you think feats are silly, too. [/B]
Balrog feat is greater. He'd tank that castle falling easily unlike Midna.
No, I said Gandalf can as well as weaker than Gandalf characters can as well.
No, you just exaggerate or downplay them based off of your bias.
I never mentioned anything not from TP, grats on looking like a tard.
No, the Balrog feat is miniscule by comparison. 'Castle falling'. I lol'd. There's a difference between something heavy falling on you and being struck so hard with a spear that the force of the attack causes the castle you're in to explode.
Go read. You brought up the Master Sword, which is more powerful than Gandalf.
Funny, since you've not provided a single feat.
Originally posted by ScreamPasteThat is my point. Tp,is only relevant here.
I never mentioned anything not from TP, grats on looking like a tard.No, the Balrog feat is miniscule by comparison. 'Castle falling'. I lol'd. There's a difference between something heavy falling on you and being struck so hard with a spear that the force of the attack causes the castle you're in to [b]explode
.Go read. You brought up the Master Sword, which is more powerful than Gandalf.
Funny, since you've not provided a single feat. [/B]
Speculation.
No, I don't think so. Dispels magic. That's it.
Lightning amped strike, kiddo.
You brought it up in response to this:
"Ganon without ToP = 3. Ganon upon first gainin ToP = 4. Ganon once he's unlocked the power of the ToP = 9001. "
Which is referencing TP. So you still look like a tard. 😐
There is no speculation, you can deny it all you like, what happened was not 'castle falling' it was 'castle busting'.
Great bit is both are better than anything movie Gandalf did.
You can continue to claim that in the face of being wrong, but you'll look like a tard. You know, more so than you do now.
Achieves **** all. Ganondorf is too durable.
Originally posted by ScreamPasteBfrd him. Exaggeration aside.
You brought it up in response to this:"Ganon without ToP = 3. Ganon upon first gainin ToP = 4. Ganon once he's unlocked the power of the ToP = 9001. "
Which is referencing TP. So you still look like a tard. 😐
There is no speculation, you can deny it all you like, what happened was not 'castle falling' it was 'castle busting'.
Great bit is both are better than anything movie Gandalf did.
You can continue to claim that in the face of being wrong, but you'll look like a tard. You know, more so than you do now.
Achieves **** all. Ganondorf is too durable.
Speculation.
Sword stroke better than being bfrd or killed by Link. Gandalf can tk blast hundreds of characters off their feet as well. Dorf couldn't even beat some sages.
And it would have BFR'd Gandalf just the same as it did Ganondorf at his weakest.
'Speculation' is just code for you ignoring evidence now, isn't it?
Being bfr'd is irrelevant and comparing Gandalf's lower strength and weaker sword to Link's superior strength and Master Sword is hilarious.
Ganondorf is immune to movie Gandalf.
Originally posted by ScreamPasteI never said Gandalf can resist specific magic.
And it would have BFR'd Gandalf just the same as it did Ganondorf at his weakest.'Speculation' is just code for you ignoring evidence now, isn't it?
Being bfr'd is irrelevant and comparing Gandalf's lower strength and weaker sword to Link's superior strength and Master Sword is hilarious.
Ganondorf is immune to movie Gandalf.
No, it's you saying your theory is factual despite a lack of proof.
Lightning sword strike and Bulbins men kod him.
Prove it.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Gandalf clearly has greater than human strength since we see him tanking attacks from the Balrog as well as surviving the fall.Gandalf wins.
2. Durability, not physical strength. Show me his physical strength.
How many times must you be asked to prove something before you manage to back up a claim? Is refusing to explain or prove things really how you argue?