Originally posted by abhilegend
😂Name me a skyfather who has oneshotted superman. Superman regularly fights and beats skyfather level beings under his own power unlike that eunuch who gets oneshotted or better twoshotted whenever he meets a skyfather.
this means one of 2 things. Either 1) D.C. skyfathers are pussies. Or 2) very shitty writing on the part of D.C. writers..
Originally posted by ODG
I already told you the proof. Galactus got sent flying by an attack that was much weaker than others he's had to deal with. Same way Odin got knocked down by an attack that was much weaker than other's he had to deal with. Res ipsa loquitur. The thing speaks for itself.Good job ignoring the real world examples by analogizing to a boxing match. Because the better analogy would be a 90 lb. weakling (Thanos/Thor) being told to gtfo or stfu by a 250 lb. heavyweight fighter, with a lead pipe in their hand and a gun (Galactus/Odin). Then that 90 lb. weakling kicks their knee and makes them stumble even though it's complete suicide to do so. Tarakis poisoning Odin has no bearing on Odin's power level. Doom prepped for a few hours and "made Beyonder his b1tch WITH EASE." That has no bearing on Beyonder's power level relative to Mephisto, who Doom's been prepping for and defeated by for years and years on end. I'll say it again, your attempts to denigrate the character are just petty and trite. And having them deconstructed isn't an invitation for you to repeat a busted line of terrible reasoning. It is PIS. That's what PIS is. Plot Induced Stupidity. A few corrections: DP Tyrant was the one who said he should flee first and gave up a host of heralds to secure his retreat. Only FP Tyrant's original fight with Galactus threatened galaxies. Your intentional misrepresentations are easily corrected. And the very fact that nobody ever mentioned that DP Tyrant could absorb his blasts until it just suddenly happens out of left field makes it the very definition of PIS. DP Tyrant never soaked in Surfer's blasts, or anybody else's. Hell, he didn't even absorb the blasts from his own orbs with stolen energy. Until it just happened for the sake of plot that made Galactus look stupid. Ergo, Plot Induced Stupidity.
Galactus acted totally different when he fought the Galactus Engine also. Guess since Galactus backed away from Odin-empowered Destroyer armor but not the Galactus Engine, that means something. Or it means absolutely nothing at all. How about you stop prevaricating over meaningless tensions between characters and focus on the feats? Oh. That's right. The plethora of feats that Odin has over DP Tyrant hurts your butt and makes your laughable attempt to obscure that... laughable. Galactus beat FP Tyrant. DP Tyrant wasn't even hurting Galactus except when he absorbed his power completely, ala Doom. There's your proof that DP Tyrant =/= Galactus, schmuck. Oh, and Galactus can easily one-shot Surfer whereas DP Tyrant took several shots to defeat a weakened Surfer. Horrificus and I went through this in another thread. Your dumbass didn't even know Mangog once defeated Odin and you repeatedly accused Horrificus of lying about it. Until you were shown the scans and shut up. Then you kept talking about lesser incarnations despite the original spell having been undone by Odin. Of course, Magus ordered his Thanos doppelganger around too (the one that the real Thanos barely managed to defeat). Magus that was defeated straight up by Doom. I'm sure you'd love to keep up this line of thought.I wasn't referring to an audience. I was referring to the other posters who were actively debating the same points I am debating. Their pointed arguments and deconstructions don't just banish themselves from the discussion because they render your repeated trolling impotent. Why do I have to repeat what they just said? You go ahead and take zopzop's cheerleading though as a sign that you're on solid ground.
😆
Totally false... your argument was deconstructed and tooled ODG and you know. Your premise and conclusion was that since Galactus was sent flying he had to be cheapshotted, because if he was ready.. he wouldn't have been hit or sent flying. I totally crushed this argument with a simple yet effective analogy. Boxers know they are going to be hit.. they expect the guy is going to hit them at all time... yet they STILL get hit and still get KO'd. That simple analogy crushes your "proof". Now that I've done that, care to offer any REAL proof of narration stating it was a cheapshot? If not, than that also crushes your theory on not moving somebody and moving somebody shows one is superior to another. Thanos didn't move Odin much.. he sent Galactus flying.. Doesn't mean Odin is greater. Next point.
You can act like it doesn't mean anything but it actually means a lot. The only hope you have in this argument is acting like the points I brought up don't mean anything, but we can all see through that. A weaker clone... with little prep.. made Odin his b1tch with EASE. The Real Deal Thanos with more prep.. LOOKING for a weakness couldn't defeat Tyrant even with acquiring an amp. How on earth you can act like this isn't significant is beyond me. One got owned with minimal prep and with utter ease.. the other still beat the person prepping for them while they had an amp. Very significant.
Untrue.. Tyrant got to keep the MAIN herald that Galactus wanted. THat was his prize above all and Tyrant refused to give him up and galactus let him keep him. So, yuo're wrong, the main person galactus wanted he didn't get. Further read the comic again.... galactus laments about all the collateral dmage that would take place if they fight. I even believe a word like Galaxies or somethign of the like was mentioned. Point is, galactus was very much conerned about collateral damage with Tyrant.. again.. never mentions ANY such thing with Odin... not a thing.
You keep focusing on what you call PIS about the fight.. problem is.... the writer went to great lengths to make it clear how big a threat Tyrant was. As I pointed out... Galactus backed down from Tyrant the first time they meet.. Galactus goes out of his way to find a planet RIPE in nutrients so he's well fed for his battle. He did NONE of those things with Odin. He wasn't the least bit concerned about fighting him. Surfer also made it clear how big a threat Tyrant was... He figured they could both destroy each other. That is how powerful he felt Tyrant was... no such reservation about Galactus fighting Odin. They are worlds apart on what Galactus thought about their power level.
You just can't get around the fact that DP tyrant was MADE IS GALACTUS IMAGE TO BE HIS EQUAL. That by default is somebody AHEAD of Odin. Dp Tyrant regained all his power back and via narration was at the height of his powers and read to challenge Galactus again. People seem to think DP Tyrant was considerably less powerful. That coulnd't be further form the truth. He had been regaining his powers for hundreds and hundreds of years. That what' she was doing. When he was ready to challenge him he came out of hiding. He also seems to believe he can beat Galactus and that is exactly what he did. Point is, somebody created to be Galactus equal.. and somebody that beats Galactus.. it's safe to say they are above Odin.
You keep on bringing up feats.. who has more feats!!! of course Odin has mroe feats he's appeared in substnatially more comics.. of course he will. What you forget though.. is that Odin has gotten beaten by ants before... beat by a thaos clone with ease... beaten by mangog... surtur etc etc. He also has the low showings that Tyrant doesn't have. Tyrant has... beating a hosts of heralds with utter ease.... beating an amped and prepped Thanos... beating a prepped and well fed Galactus... I'll take all those high showings over a lot of okay showings but more of them. As I already showed you with a number of examples.. more feats doesn't mean you're more powerful... is that the logic you're working with? If so, that is yet another one of your fallacies I need to correct.
This fight is very simple really... on one hand we have somebody that is a rival to Galactus and was made to be his equal. It took Galactus 1000's of years to beat Tyrant... THAT is how powerful he was. DP Tyrant got all his power back and is now more powerful than ever. He regained power to again be considered a peer to galactus and with narration to back up such a stance. He goes out and proves narration right and beats Galactus. You might have a point about the fight not coutning for much if he shold've lost and we know he was weaker. It's the exact opposite really. He was a ton of narration making it clear he is a threat to Galactus.. it doesn't matter then how he won.. it was clear he could also win. When you compare how Tyrant and Odin did against common foes it becomes clear who is stronger... One beat a well fed galactus and beat a prepped and amped Thanos. A thanos not looking for a fight with Odin and without any prep or amp... does the distance with Odin and never once backs down. AN amped and prepped Thanos fights Tyrant and leaves and admits Tyrant would kil him if he stayed. WORLDS apart. Tyrant beats a well fed galactus... Galactus not as well fed.. beats Odin with relative ease. See the gap in power here? It's quite clear and pronounced.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiGalactus doesn't consider himself a boxer next to Thanos. He considers himself a tank next to a peashooter. Don't be dumb.
Totally false... your argument was deconstructed and tooled ODG and you know. Your premise and conclusion was that since Galactus was sent flying he had to be cheapshotted, because if he was ready.. he wouldn't have been hit or sent flying. I totally crushed this argument with a simple yet effective analogy. Boxers know they are going to be hit.. they expect the guy is going to hit them at all time... yet they STILL get hit and still get KO'd. That simple analogy crushes your "proof". Now that I've done that, care to offer any REAL proof of narration stating it was a cheapshot? If not, than that also crushes your theory on not moving somebody and moving somebody shows one is superior to another. Thanos didn't move Odin much.. he sent Galactus flying.. Doesn't mean Odin is greater. Next point.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiPoisoning someone because they beat you once already because you don't want to engae them straight-up tells us a lot about Thanos and his memories of his beating.
You can act like it doesn't mean anything but it actually means a lot. The only hope you have in this argument is acting like the points I brought up don't mean anything, but we can all see through that. A weaker clone... with little prep.. made Odin his b1tch with EASE. The Real Deal Thanos with more prep.. LOOKING for a weakness couldn't defeat Tyrant even with acquiring an amp. How on earth you can act like this isn't significant is beyond me. One got owned with minimal prep and with utter ease.. the other still beat the person prepping for them while they had an amp. Very significant.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiAlready went through this with zopzop. DP Tyrant admitted first he had to retreat and gave up six out of the seven heralds he captured. SIX OUT OF SEVEN. The collateral damage comment you're speaking of was Thanos' narration of old records. You're confusing the scenes. And I already deconstructed your reliance on galaxy-level collateral damage. By simply pointing out that when DP Tyrant fought Galactus, no galaxies were threatened. Remember?
Untrue.. Tyrant got to keep the MAIN herald that Galactus wanted. THat was his prize above all and Tyrant refused to give him up and galactus let him keep him. So, yuo're wrong, the main person galactus wanted he didn't get. Further read the comic again.... galactus laments about all the collateral dmage that would take place if they fight. I even believe a word like Galaxies or somethign of the like was mentioned. Point is, galactus was very much conerned about collateral damage with Tyrant.. again.. never mentions ANY such thing with Odin... not a thing.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiGalactus forgot two of DP Tyrant's main abilities in the middle of the fight. Granted, nobody (not even the readers) knew about these abilities before the fight actually happened. So it is, by the very definition of the term, Plot Induced Stupidity. Galactus was made to look stupid simply for the sake of the plot It's as simple as that.
You keep focusing on what you call PIS about the fight.. problem is.... the writer went to great lengths to make it clear how big a threat Tyrant was. As I pointed out... Galactus backed down from Tyrant the first time they meet.. Galactus goes out of his way to find a planet RIPE in nutrients so he's well fed for his battle. He did NONE of those things with Odin. He wasn't the least bit concerned about fighting him. Surfer also made it clear how big a threat Tyrant was... He figured they could both destroy each other. That is how powerful he felt Tyrant was... no such reservation about Galactus fighting Odin. They are worlds apart on what Galactus thought about their power level.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiAnd DP Tyrant wasn't his equal. Intended, maybe. But not, since DP Tyrant couldn't engage Galactus straight-up and had to use power drainage against him. Easy enough to get over since it's virtually a non-point.
You just can't get around the fact that DP tyrant was MADE IS GALACTUS IMAGE TO BE HIS EQUAL. That by default is somebody AHEAD of Odin. Dp Tyrant regained all his power back and via narration was at the height of his powers and read to challenge Galactus again. People seem to think DP Tyrant was considerably less powerful. That coulnd't be further form the truth. He had been regaining his powers for hundreds and hundreds of years. That what' she was doing. When he was ready to challenge him he came out of hiding. He also seems to believe he can beat Galactus and that is exactly what he did. Point is, somebody created to be Galactus equal.. and somebody that beats Galactus.. it's safe to say they are above Odin.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiThat bolded snippet is all that matters in this wall o text that you probably spent hours on. Odin has a vast compendium of feats superior to DP Tyrant's. Against the same opponents, i.e., Thanos and Surfer, Odin was undeniably superior.
You keep on bringing up feats.. who has more feats!!! of course Odin has mroe feats he's appeared in substnatially more comics.. of course he will. What you forget though.. is that Odin has gotten beaten by ants before... beat by a thaos clone with ease... beaten by mangog... surtur etc etc. He also has the low showings that Tyrant doesn't have. Tyrant has... beating a hosts of heralds with utter ease.... beating an amped and prepped Thanos... beating a prepped and well fed Galactus... I'll take all those high showings over a lot of okay showings but more of them. As I already showed you with a number of examples.. more feats doesn't mean you're more powerful... is that the logic you're working with? If so, that is yet another one of your fallacies I need to correct.This fight is very simple really... on one hand we have somebody that is a rival to Galactus and was made to be his equal. It took Galactus 1000's of years to beat Tyrant... THAT is how powerful he was. DP Tyrant got all his power back and is now more powerful than ever. He regained power to again be considered a peer to galactus and with narration to back up such a stance. He goes out and proves narration right and beats Galactus. You might have a point about the fight not coutning for much if he shold've lost and we know he was weaker. It's the exact opposite really. He was a ton of narration making it clear he is a threat to Galactus.. it doesn't matter then how he won.. it was clear he could also win. When you compare how Tyrant and Odin did against common foes it becomes clear who is stronger... One beat a well fed galactus and beat a prepped and amped Thanos. A thanos not looking for a fight with Odin and without any prep or amp... does the distance with Odin and never once backs down. AN amped and prepped Thanos fights Tyrant and leaves and admits Tyrant would kil him if he stayed. WORLDS apart. Tyrant beats a well fed galactus... Galactus not as well fed.. beats Odin with relative ease. See the gap in power here? It's quite clear and pronounced.
End of story. And you are so easy to deconstruct, it's pathetic.
Originally posted by TheGodKillerHow about I bring you up just to warn and ban you? Next time I see one of your posts/threads reported I will make good on the warning.
You brought him up because of the trauma(both physical and emotional) suffered in past interactions with him.Clearly, me backhandedly mentioning your anal rape reignites those victim scars that you've been long nursing. You really have broken now, and the funny thing is I didn't even intend it.
Originally posted by abhilegendAbhi, you have no clue how close to having a week off from KMC. It would be in your best interest to avoid bashing, trolling, baiting and flaming.
Says the coward who fled from comicvine, failtroller.
Originally posted by ODG
Galactus doesn't consider himself a boxer next to Thanos. He considers himself a tank next to a peashooter. Don't be dumb. Poisoning someone because they beat you once already because you don't want to engae them straight-up tells us a lot about Thanos and his memories of his beating. Already went through this with zopzop. DP Tyrant admitted first he had to retreat and gave up six out of the seven heralds he captured. SIX OUT OF SEVEN. The collateral damage comment you're speaking of was Thanos' narration of old records. You're confusing the scenes. And I already deconstructed your reliance on galaxy-level collateral damage. By simply pointing out that when DP Tyrant fought Galactus, no galaxies were threatened. Remember? Galactus forgot two of DP Tyrant's main abilities in the middle of the fight. Granted, nobody (not even the readers) knew about these abilities before the fight actually happened. So it is, by the very definition of the term, Plot Induced Stupidity. Galactus was made to look stupid simply for the sake of the plot It's as simple as that. And DP Tyrant wasn't his equal. Intended, maybe. But not, since DP Tyrant couldn't engage Galactus straight-up and had to use power drainage against him. Easy enough to get over since it's virtually a non-point. That bolded snippet is all that matters in this wall o text that you probably spent hours on. Odin has a vast compendium of feats superior to DP Tyrant's. Against the same opponents, i.e., Thanos and Surfer, Odin was undeniably superior.End of story. And you are so easy to deconstruct, it's pathetic.
Still waiting on that proof that is was a cheapshot. Your explanation of.. well it hit him and moved him.. thus it must've been doesn't work. I used a perfect analogy to show that even when knowing some thing coming and expecting it.. doesn't mean you won't get hit by it or KO'd. Your argument was fallacy based and it was handled as such.
No what it shows is that is how powerful Tyrant is... Not only does he not have easy weaknessses to exploit.. but an inferior clone can get the better of Odin with a little prep and utter ease. The real deal with more prep and an amp can't even get the better of Tyrant. Yes, it should how big the gap in power is.. or at the very least.. the gap in exploitable weaknesses.
No, Dp Tyrant refused to give up his PRIZED herald. If I ask for my baseball cards back.. does it matter that you gave me Barry Bonds, Ken Griffey Jr. and Mark Mcquire cards back.. when you still kept my mickey mantle rookie and what I was mainly going there for? Galactus went there for his prized position and was promptly told to get lost and kick rocks cause you weren't getting it. Surely, if Galactus was so much above Tyrant.. he would've choosen to engage him right there and take him. He didn't. Wonder why? Hmmmm maybe because Tyrant was a legit threat.. something the writer was beating us over the head with.
Tyrant was made in Galactus image.. it's that simple. He was meant to be Galactus equal and the writer made it clear as day he was that kinda threat. He literally beat us over the head with narration and actions from Galactus that make it clear he was a legit threat and an equal. Let me ask you this
1. If you believe Tyrant is Galactus equal or very close to it.. would it be horrible logic to then consider him above Odin?
2. Isn't it true that there was plenty of narration and actions from Galactus that the writer wanted us to view Tyrant as a legit threat to Galactus and a powerful Character. Is that fair to say?
I just showed you how feats don't mean anything. By feats wolverine is stronger than sabertooth. He has more strength feats by a good margin. Yet we all know Sabertooth is the stronger of the two. Surfer has more feats Lord Mar-vell... thousands of more feats... doesn't make him more powerful. or frankly even that close. Mxy has more feats than the ultimator.. yet it was explicitly stated that she was above Mxy.. even though her feats were sorely lacking. Feats are a good gauge no doubt, and one of the very most important things to look at. Yet in this case, it's the character presentation and feats that matter most. Tyrant has NO lows feats at all.. and has solid feats of beating a host of heralds with utter ease.. beating an amped and prepped Thanos.. and beating a well fed Galactus. Those stack up quite nicely with many of Odin higher end feats and average ones. Difference is, he has far far far fewer appearances. So in cases like that.. you don't just go.. ohhhhh more feats wins.. that is utterly stupid and you're bette than that. You look how the feats he did have and how he was viewed to gauge his power. When you do that.. you come out that he's and should be above Odin. even if slightly.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Still waiting on that proof that is was a cheapshot. Your explanation of.. well it hit him and moved him.. thus it must've been doesn't work. I used a perfect analogy to show that even when knowing some thing coming and expecting it.. doesn't mean you won't get hit by it or KO'd. Your argument was fallacy based and it was handled as such.No what it shows is that is how powerful Tyrant is... Not only does he not have easy weaknessses to exploit.. but an inferior clone can get the better of Odin with a little prep and utter ease. The real deal with more prep and an amp can't even get the better of Tyrant. Yes, it should how big the gap in power is.. or at the very least.. the gap in exploitable weaknesses.
No, Dp Tyrant refused to give up his PRIZED herald. If I ask for my baseball cards back.. does it matter that you gave me Barry Bonds, Ken Griffey Jr. and Mark Mcquire cards back.. when you still kept my mickey mantle rookie and what I was mainly going there for? Galactus went there for his prized position and was promptly told to get lost and kick rocks cause you weren't getting it. Surely, if Galactus was so much above Tyrant.. he would've choosen to engage him right there and take him. He didn't. Wonder why? Hmmmm maybe because Tyrant was a legit threat.. something the writer was beating us over the head with.
Tyrant was made in Galactus image.. it's that simple. He was meant to be Galactus equal and the writer made it clear as day he was that kinda threat. He literally beat us over the head with narration and actions from Galactus that make it clear he was a legit threat and an equal. Let me ask you this
1. If you believe Tyrant is Galactus equal or very close to it.. would it be horrible logic to then consider him above Odin?
2. Isn't it true that there was plenty of narration and actions from Galactus that the writer wanted us to view Tyrant as a legit threat to Galactus and a powerful Character. Is that fair to say?
I just showed you how feats don't mean anything. By feats wolverine is stronger than sabertooth. He has more strength feats by a good margin. Yet we all know Sabertooth is the stronger of the two. Surfer has more feats Lord Mar-vell... thousands of more feats... doesn't make him more powerful. or frankly even that close. Mxy has more feats than the ultimator.. yet it was explicitly stated that she was above Mxy.. even though her feats were sorely lacking. Feats are a good gauge no doubt, and one of the very most important things to look at. Yet in this case, it's the character presentation and feats that matter most. Tyrant has NO lows feats at all.. and has solid feats of beating a host of heralds with utter ease.. beating an amped and prepped Thanos.. and beating a well fed Galactus. Those stack up quite nicely with many of Odin higher end feats and average ones. Difference is, he has far far far fewer appearances. So in cases like that.. you don't just go.. ohhhhh more feats wins.. that is utterly stupid and you're bette than that. You look how the feats he did have and how he was viewed to gauge his power. When you do that.. you come out that he's and should be above Odin. even if slightly.
It was a cheapshot because Galactus didn't know he was going to be attacked. He didn't brace, put up shields, block, or anything to defend against the blast. If Galactus knew the blast was coming then he would have defended against it. Why get hit with a blast on purpose when you know that it can hurt you on?
And if it wasn't a cheapshot then Thanos could have blasted him again when Galactus got back. But Thanos knew he wouldn't be able to do the same thing and put up shields.
Tyrant showed no energy blast output greater than Odin's average. His physical power IMO is greater than Odin's (he's stronger and possibly more durable against blunt attacks).
DP Tryant wasn't Galactus's equal. He had to drain Galactus in order to equal him. That means DP Tyrant starts under Galactus.
You have Gladiator matching Tyrant's power output. This means that Tyrant isn't too far above the highest high herald.
You have Tyrant only beating Gladiator through a cheapshot.
Originally posted by h1a8
It was a cheapshot because Galactus didn't know he was going to be attacked. He didn't brace, put up shields, block, or anything to defend against the blast. If Galactus knew the blast was coming then he would have defended against it. Why get hit with a blast on purpose when you know that it can hurt you on?
And if it wasn't a cheapshot then Thanos could have blasted him again when Galactus got back. But Thanos knew he wouldn't be able to do the same thing and put up shields.Tyrant showed no energy blast output greater than Odin's average. His physical power IMO is greater than Odin's (he's stronger and possibly more durable against blunt attacks).
DP Tryant wasn't Galactus's equal. He had to drain Galactus in order to equal him. That means DP Tyrant starts under Galactus.
You have Gladiator matching Tyrant's power output. This means that Tyrant isn't too far above the highest high herald.
You have Tyrant only beating Gladiator through a cheapshot.
Originally posted by h1a8
It was a cheapshot because Galactus didn't know he was going to be attacked. He didn't brace, put up shields, block, or anything to defend against the blast. If Galactus knew the blast was coming then he would have defended against it. Why get hit with a blast on purpose when you know that it can hurt you on?
And if it wasn't a cheapshot then Thanos could have blasted him again when Galactus got back. But Thanos knew he wouldn't be able to do the same thing and put up shields.Tyrant showed no energy blast output greater than Odin's average. His physical power IMO is greater than Odin's (he's stronger and possibly more durable against blunt attacks).
DP Tryant wasn't Galactus's equal. He had to drain Galactus in order to equal him. That means DP Tyrant starts under Galactus.
You have Gladiator matching Tyrant's power output. This means that Tyrant isn't too far above the highest high herald.
You have Tyrant only beating Gladiator through a cheapshot.
This is an error filled post to say the least. I was tempted to put up a giant facepalm image.
Originally posted by ODGI have a 2 year old daughter. She has slapped me in the face. It stings like a motherphucker. However, my daughter being able to sting my cheek with a slap certainly doesn't mean her level of strength is remotely close to my own by default.
Galactus doesn't consider himself a boxer next to Thanos. He considers himself a tank next to a peashooter.
Now take that [albeit simple] analogy and scale it up to the cosmic level, and it should become much easier [for all] to comprehend the Thanos/Galactus 'scuffle', imho.
Originally posted by Galan007
I have a 2 year old daughter. She has slapped me in the face. It stings like a motherphucker. However, my daughter being able to sting my cheek with a slap certainly doesn't mean her level of strength is remotely close to my own by default.Now take that [albeit simple] analogy and scale it up to the cosmic level, and it should become much easier [for all] to comprehend the Thanos/Galactus 'scuffle', imho.
To start my friend... they are claiming it was a cheapshot.. they have ZERO proof it was other then.. look it effected him.. it wouldn't have effected him if he wasn't caught by surprise. I took care of that premise with a simple boxing analogy. So unless they have proof it was a cheapshot.. we'll stick with what we see in the comic.
lastly, your example is a bit off though... Thanos has blasting power far beyond a 2 year old compared to a grown man. It would be more analogous to a teenager punching a man. We've seen one shot kill high heralds and the like. One shot kill. We've seen both Galactus and odin blast heralds and not kill them. Now, I'm not claiming his blasting power is above theirs.. but I'm simply pointing out... Thanos is known for his blasting power and has the feats to show it. The one shotting of heralds... the one shotting of quasar's construct that numerous heralds coulnd't even do anything to.. the matching or near matching of an abstracts blasting power in the IB to name some. Point is, Thanos has some impressive blasting power feats.. including the Galactus one.