Data vs. Khan

Started by quanchi11232 pages

Originally posted by Silent Master
This is another of his known tactics, he did the same to Ares in the Michael Myers vs Bride thread.
I won that thread too. Owned an entire board there. Man, I'm good.

Originally posted by Silent Master
It's kind of sad that his debating ability hasn't improved in the last 5 years.
Leave Robbie alone he's trying, dammit.

You got destroyed in that thread.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You got destroyed in that thread.
I wrecked shop in that thread.

No, you got wrecked.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, you got wrecked.
No, I wrecked shop.

As anyone can see, you got destroyed so hard that you purposely got banned just to escape owning

http://herochat.com/forum/index.php/topic,177986.0.html

Originally posted by quanchi112
I never said he agrees with my outcome just my reasoning.

You are foaming at the mouth in typical ridiculous fashion.

You quoted and edited to make it appear that he was saying Khan beats Data here, when he wasn't. That makes you a dishonest clown.

Oh look, a reworded "you mad" because you were caught quote editing and lying, bandwagon-boi.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Only banned after I announced I was going for it on here first with regards to cbr.

even worse, you wuss-banned yourself. might have had a shred more respect if otherwise. so when the butthurt of even this ridiculous forum subdirectory overwhelms you, what will you do? they dont ban on request here irrc.

So Silent Master was correct when he said Quanchi got banned on purpose as a means to duck out from his shame. That's pretty weak, imo.

Not as weak as quote editing, but weak, imo.

straight from the horse's mouth.

Originally posted by Silent Master
He claims that you conceded to him in the Star Trek reboot vs. Star Trek original thread, is that true?

lol, in his dreams maybe.

Originally posted by focus4chumps
straight from the horse's mouth.

What do you have against horses, man. They don't even use dishonest clown quote edit tactics.

Originally posted by -Pr-
lol, in his dreams maybe.

Thank you.

It's now offical, quan was lying.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Nowhere near comparable to Khan in terms of ruthlessness. Not even close.

I'll reiterate again that, unless stated in the OP, CIS is turned off.

But how is Khan supposed to win against a character that is literally bullet proof? That's from First Contact, by he way. What can he possibly do to Data with his hands?

Originally posted by Silent Master
As anyone can see, you got destroyed so hard that you purposely got banned just to escape owning

http://herochat.com/forum/index.php/topic,177986.0.html

Link is missing something...like...why in the world he was banned. I am not reading 75 pages to get a very very very small amount of entertainment. Link to the post that got him banned and the message from the mod that said why he was banned (if it occurred in the thread).

I'd argue that Data isn't bulletproof, just that he can easily shrug off the damage to the right areas. But from a movie-alone standpoint, you'd be correct, bulletproof android.

Originally posted by Silent Master
As anyone can see, you got destroyed so hard that you purposely got banned just to escape owning

http://herochat.com/forum/index.php/topic,177986.0.html

No, I didn't I was so inside their heads I was banned. Still posting on there though unlike your ban and refusal to post again.

Originally posted by Robtard
You quoted and edited to make it appear that he was saying Khan beats Data here, when he wasn't. That makes you a dishonest clown.

Oh look, a reworded "you mad" because you were caught quote editing and lying, bandwagon-boi.

I said he agreed with my reasoning which was 100 percent true. 🙂

Quit sobbing over it. You act like my reasoning sucks until someone else says it and remain quiet due to your personal butthurt from my penis.

Originally posted by Robtard
So Silent Master was correct when he said Quanchi got banned on purpose as a means to duck out from his shame. That's pretty weak, imo.

Not as weak as quote editing, but weak, imo.

Wrong. I had multiple threads in my dedication in the ask the staff section. The impact I had over there was legendary.