MM is the game changer here in all honesty
Hulk's TP defense is back to shit. Thor was recently controlled by Xavier's mind, although that's apparently way greater than 1/5 Emma and 1/5 Namor's, so who the **** knows with that one... but it's there. Who knows with Hype
In a raw power fight, I'd give the Avengers the edge, but with MM's TP, it easily shifts to 4 vs 2.
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
I was just naming all his feats.You think Terminus' metal armor durability gets harder the more attention he pays? I get it if he just knocked him out, but he tore through his armor/head effortlessly.
Really stupid question
And in the second fight, he accomplished nothing vs Hyperion. Hyperion crying out in pain while Thor gets visibly damaged isn't exactly a low feat either.
He tanked Thor's lightning bolt afterwards. With Ex, I have a feeling it's a wait and see. Especially considering Infinity has a lot to do with his race of Builders. Then again, Thanos might wipe his entire race out, and that'd be fantastic too.
And if Hickman never explains it?
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
That's actually what you do. I mean, you're literally asking for low feats, and that isn't the best way to paint someone else's habits.His only appearances are out of a so far 13 issue series. You tell me if he has low showings.
I don't know much about this new Hyperion but some feats of his. That's why I'm asking. You were basically insinuating that average Hyperion can do those things.
This doesn't seem to sound right (but it could be true).
I just remember you always point out lower showings that contradict feats mentioned by me or other members here to justify your stance that the character isn't that powerful on average.
But here you are doing the opposite and don't see it.
Could the reason be
Spoiler:?
You have a dislike for Superman.
Originally posted by h1a8You're asking for low feats when I said in my post that those are all his feats.
I don't know much about this new Hyperion but some feats of his. That's why I'm asking. You were basically insinuating that average Hyperion can do those things.
This doesn't seem to sound right (but it could be true).I just remember you always point out lower showings that contradict feats mentioned by me or other members here to justify your stance that the character isn't that powerful on average.
But here you are doing the opposite and don't see it.
Could the reason be
Spoiler:? [/B]
You have a dislike for Superman.
I named all his feats. If all his feats doesn't make an average that sounds right to you, then don't comment on it.
Stop talking about yourself Mr "Dead world means no atmosphere and it means the planet is tiny and it also means it was weakened"
Naming all of Hyperion's feats means I dislike Superman... says the guy defending Superman asking for low feats of Hyperion.
Don't you think Superman should beat Odin too for that matter?
Originally posted by zopzopAnd it wouldn't have mattered since he effortlessly shattered everything that protected him.No. But the fake Terminus' attention was on Thor. And Thor looked like he was calling down the mother of all lightening attacks as Hyperion did his thing.
Then I'm sure it's easily answered.
Only Thor's clothing was visibly damaged.
Hmm. Didn't Captain Universe one shot the guy? Or am I think of someone else?
Then it is what it is. [/B]
Hickman's only written HE in like 10 panels. Going by your logic he has no feats besides the Hyperion fight, and that's just beyond retarded. Get your shit out of my face.
Captain Universe one shotted the Aleph, who Shang Chi was chopping his legs off. Apparently the Aleph destroyed civilizations and worlds or some shit. So yeah, that.
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
You're asking for low feats when I said in my post that those are all his feats.I named all his feats. If all his feats doesn't make an average that sounds right to you, then don't comment on it.
Stop talking about yourself Mr "Dead world means no atmosphere and it means the planet is tiny and it also means it was weakened"
Naming all of Hyperion's feats means I dislike Superman... says the guy defending Superman asking for low feats of Hyperion.
Don't you think Superman should beat Odin too for that matter?
Way to ignore what i said. I said, I meant showings (both high and low) and not feats. Isn't that what makes an average? Or do you think just averaging highest showings is what makes an average?
Way to not address the fact that you consistently point out low showings for characters in response to someone naming their high showings when you just named Hyperion's high showings (we are not using the term feat anymore) as if they make his average power level.
Originally posted by h1a8Oh, you want me to name all of Hyperion's high and low feats?
Way to ignore what i said. I said, I meant showings (both high and low) and not feats. Isn't that what makes an average? Or do you think just averaging highest showings is what makes an average?Way to not address the fact that you consistently point out low showings for characters in response to someone naming their high showings when you just named Hyperion's high showings (we are not using the term feat anymore) as if they make his average power level.
OK, I did it. A long ****ing time ago. Shut up.
You're asking for low feats so you can lowball him when he has none. Thinking about reporting...
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Oh, you want me to name all of Hyperion's high and low feats?OK, I did it. A long ****ing time ago. Shut up.
You're asking for low feats so you can lowball him when he has none. Thinking about reporting...
LOL. You just misunderstand me. Maybe I should take some writing classes.
I don't want you to name his low showings (stop saying feats). Just acknowledge that he has some.
The problem I have is when you CLAIMED those showings make his average (as in average power level).
Remember overall showings make an average and not just feats.
Originally posted by h1a8Do you have a tumor in your brain or something?
LOL. You just misunderstand me. Maybe I should take some writing classes.I don't want you to name his low showings (stop saying feats). Just acknowledge that he has some.
The problem I have is when you CLAIMED those showings make his average (as in average power level).
Remember overall showings make an average and not just feats.
Those are all his low, high, and average feats. Stop looking for low showings.
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Do you have a tumor in your brain or something?Those are all his low, high, and average feats. Stop looking for low showings.
Why are you still using the term "Feats"? We are talking about showings. A showing can be a feat or a non feat.It is Something that can be used to determine the average power level of a character (from your book).
You claiming those showings you named can be averaged to know Hyperion's average power level. This is false if Hyperion has showings under these (showings, not feats).
If he has no showings that contradict those ones you named then you are correct and we can use those showings to average him out. And I concede. I'll take your word on it without question. I can do this since I feel you are honest.
Originally posted by h1a8
LOL. You just misunderstand me. Maybe I should take some writing classes.I don't want you to name his low showings (stop saying feats). Just acknowledge that he has some.
The problem I have is when you CLAIMED those showings make his average (as in average power level).
Remember overall showings make an average and not just feats.
Originally posted by StyleTime
H1, what the flying hell are you talking about?
Read all the posts and don't be lazy.
Bran is notorious for countering members who use high showings by mentioning low showings to insinuate an average.
Yet he named all of Hyperion's high showings (his feats) and implied they can be averaged to give Hyperion's average power level.
He basically said he named all of Hyperion's feats when, according to his rules, feats aren't the only things used to average a character.
I have nothing against naming feats or high showings. I have something against using them to establish an average power level when that person is against that notion in other threads.
Originally posted by h1a8Well it's a good thing Hyperion neither has low feat showings, nor low showing "non feat" statements. Besides the one Carver mentioned... which wasn't a low feat/non feat showing in the slightest.
Why are you still using the term "Feats"? We are talking about showings. A showing can be a feat or a non feat.It is Something that can be used to determine the average power level of a character (from your book).You claiming those showings you named can be averaged to know Hyperion's average power level. This is false if Hyperion has showings under these (showings, not feats).
If he has no showings that contradict those ones you named then you are correct and we can use those showings to average him out. And I concede. I'll take your word on it without question. I can do this since I feel you are honest.
You literally have no idea what you're talking about though. You're just looking for any sort of lowballing you can find, either power showing, or statement apparently... since you've been so keen on them in the past...
Originally posted by h1a8Reported for trolling/making shit up
Read all the posts and don't be lazy.Bran is notorious for countering members who use high showings by mentioning low showings to insinuate an average.
Yet he named all of Hyperion's high showings (his feats) and implied they can be averaged to give Hyperion's average power level.
He basically said he named all of Hyperion's feats when, according to his rules, feats aren't the only things used to average a character.
I have nothing against naming feats or high showings. I have something against using them to establish an average power level when that person is against that notion in other threads.
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
MM is the game changer here in all honesty.
Yeah, mind screw ftw.
Too bad mind attacks are about the only power he really uses, and otherwise comes across as a poor man's Superman. I mean, with TP he should be able to copy Mr. X's trick, and do one better by letting them phase through him instead of dodge.
And he almost never uses invisibility unless he's scouting. I think The Weird is the only one he's ever KOed while maintaining invisibility.
