Wonder Woman Vs Thor

Started by quanchi11248 pages

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Thor is stronger
👆

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
No it's not:

Abhil, I really don't want to have to double check everything you ever reference.

And? Do you read your scans? They made it clear that he had all the powers of amazo and even some more and that he could replicate all of their powers. Your brain does blocks things you don't want to see.

He made a theoretical guess and you accept this?
Not a theoretical guess. It was an observation in combat.

We'll ignore Batman as well I guess.
We have to. Batman has survived far worse. Unless you want to explain him surviving a bloodlusted superman choking him with all his strength too. Batman is a wrong choice for lowballing.

No they aren't. Especially since Kid Amazo didn't stack strength and was only Superman level in strength. I decided to read the arc and it was mentioned many ties.

😂

You just provided the scan where they spelled it out that he could stack powers like amazo. This is just getting laughable.

Okay, so why are you bringing it up when in response to Thor matching Kurse for an extended period of time as if it was? It's not like she even forced Kid Amazo down or anything.
Because both are not strength showings, at least not purely. Thor didn't match more than twice his own strength, it was his tenacity that made him able to stop Kurse from toppling him as they spelled it out in the scan. The mere notion of it being a strength showing is stupid.

Doing what Thor did says a lot more about physical strength then grabbing an opponent from behind to no meaningful effect.
Now you're straight up lowballing. She did restrain him.

So what? Are we comparing durability or strength? In the same breath that you doubt Thor's feat because Kurse is stronger, you mention an Amazo who is Wonder Woman combined with Superman? How can I make a serious reply to that? Also scan please.
I don't have the scans of that atm. Check out JLA 24.

This thread is becoming a joke, every Wonder Woman supporting scan has had her lifting something with Superman helping, the Kid Amazo scan was literally a non feat much like the spectre feat, and you could make an argument that they didn't do anything when they pulled the planet...

She has solid feats, use them...

She Just isn't as strong as Thor

Originally posted by pym-ftw
This thread is becoming a joke, every Wonder Woman supporting scan has had her lifting something with Superman helping, the Kid Amazo scan was literally a non feat much like the spectre feat, and you could make an argument that they didn't do anything when they pulled the planet...

She has solid feats, use them...

She Just isn't as strong as Thor


facepalm

This is better than Thor's showing against Kurse. She pushed Amazo through 12 floors and locked arms with him for an extended time too. Hey rage, check out how amazo who was stronger than diana and Kal together killed batman with a backhand!

Also here diana armlocks with a doomsday which was as strong as original DOS Doomsday at start and was getting stronger

Is Wonder Woman strong,yes!

Is Wonder Woman is in the same league as Superman, Thor, Hulk, Captain Marvel, yes!

But she is not stronger than Thor or Superman, if Superman, Hulk and Thor are 10 in strength for high heralds, Wonder Woman would be a 9.5, they're on different level of strength for high heralds.

Wonder Woman doesn't have the same feats or similar to the likes of Superman, Thor, Hulk she doesn't have them, she has shared feats which is not the same as doing yourself :/. This is my observation!!

Originally posted by abhilegend
Unless you want to explain him surviving a bloodlusted superman choking him with all his strength too

show me or specify an issue if you please.

as for your scans, you just outright lied about amazo killing batman:

http://i.imgur.com/dsX7Uoq.jpg

that was 2 pages after your last scan, nothing short of a blind person could miss it, unless of course, you intended it.

also WW had a better fight with amazo earlier in the issue:

http://i.imgur.com/dN0z8JE.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/crrZmPj.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/W1dyMVe.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/93H7DSS.jpg

still lost though.

Originally posted by operator616
show me or specify an issue if you please.

as for your scans, you just outright lied about amazo killing batman:

http://i.imgur.com/dsX7Uoq.jpg

that was 2 pages after your last scan, nothing short of a blind person could miss it, unless of course, you intended it.

also WW had a better fight with amazo earlier in the issue:

http://i.imgur.com/dN0z8JE.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/crrZmPj.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/W1dyMVe.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/93H7DSS.jpg

still lost though.


Sacrifice, obviously.

You obviously can't detect sarcasm.

I know. I was just talking about armlock.

lol @ thread.

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
Yes. It should be obvious. The fact this has gone on so long...

KMC has officially deteriorated to a comicvine-level forum. 🙁

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
KMC has officially deteriorated to a comicvine-level forum. 🙁

Why? Just because wonder woman is being considered roughly equal to thor in strength?

Thor is stronger.

Originally posted by abhilegend
facepalm

This is better than Thor's showing against Kurse. She pushed Amazo through 12 floors and locked arms with him for an extended time too. Hey rage, check out how amazo who was stronger than diana and Kal together killed batman with a backhand!


No it's not. The Thor one was way more impressive.

And she definitely did not lock arms with Amazo for an extended time. Where you get that is beyond me.

Kurse and Thor were easily matching strength for a much longer period of time until Thor "rose" to the challenge and flung his @$$ away.

Doesn't help that Amazo had shit ass durability.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Thor is stronger.

Every marvelites is saying that and using striking feats as strength feats. I haven't seen a single scan which CLEARLY denotes he's stronger.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Every marvelites is saying that and using striking feats as strength feats. I haven't seen a single scan which CLEARLY denotes he's stronger.

So everyone who thinks Thor is stronger (he is) is a Marvelite or Thorbag...but people who think Diana is stronger or equal to Thor aren't DC loyalists or anything like that?

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
No it's not. The Thor one was way more impressive.

And she definitely did not lock arms with Amazo for an extended time. Where you get that is beyond me.

Kurse and Thor were easily matching strength for a much longer period of time until Thor "rose" to the challenge and flung his @$$ away.

No, its not. Being stronger than superman and wonder woman combined is being stronger than Kurse anyway.

She did. She even had him on the knees for a second or two before he overpowered her.

Thor wasn't "matching" strength with Kurse. It was his tenacity as spelled out in the scan. Where did he fling him away?

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Doesn't help that Amazo had shit ass durability.

What does that have to do with anything?

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
So everyone who thinks Thor is stronger (he is) is a Marvelite or Thorbag...but people who think Diana is stronger or equal to Thor aren't DC loyalists or anything like that?

Never said otherwise.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Every marvelites is saying that and using striking feats as strength feats. I haven't seen a single scan which CLEARLY denotes he's stronger.

So a striking feat is not a strength feat?

Originally posted by abhilegend
What does that have to do with anything?

It shows his physical limits, which clearly indicate that it's not that difficult in the general sense to damage him significantly. Detracts from his overall formidability.