Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Oh sure I'll concede that I won't go wasting my time on that.Still doesn't change the fact u haven't convinced anyone on your propaganda tour.
And please show valid feats for once. Not ones that can be debunked.
Originally posted by h1a8
No he isn't. I still believe Diana is roughly equal or stronger.
Now if Marvel Hercules is a lot stronger than D.C. Hercules then Thor is stronger.
FFS.....
Originally posted by -Pr-
DC Herc and Marvel Herc aren't equals unless you can prove they're equals through feats.Like Jake said, it's generally used as a roundabout way to serve an agenda.
Originally posted by abhilegend
DC hercules=/=Marvel herc. Who is arguing that they are equal except h1?
Originally posted by Nibedicus
It's a "non-feat" because Superman has been strongly debated or at the very least perceived on the forum as a planet puller on his own. Usually by the same ppl who argue on WW's behalf w/ regards to this "feat".The fact that Superman is a "solo planet puller" means that he could have pulled anywhere between some or ALL of the weight himself.
Kinda like me pulling a 10 ton boulder via cables alongside a bulldozer. I can "claim" that I pulled a 10 ton boulder, but it's pretty much a "non-feat" at this point.
Tho, I DO agree much of what you say and if the same posters concede these possibility that pre-DCnU Superman's strength is not "planetary" then I am more than willing to re-evaluate my perception on how the "feat" measures what WW can do.
Personally, tho, I've always seen pre-DCnU Superman to be planetary in strength and it would require more knowledgeable posters than I to change that perception.
But I'm still waiting to see that proof that he is a "solo planet puller." If he were, he wouldn't have needed not one, but two other people to help him. This was also true when they had to pull the Moon, which is much smaller.
Your analogy is also flawed because your strength is no where near that of a bulldozer. I'm not going to sit here and argue that WW is as strong as Superman, but her strength is definitely up there. It makes even less sense to argue that she was barely contributing anything than it does to argue that she was pulling an equal share.
It is a feat. It's not a quantifiable feat per say, but it is still very impressive. When they decided to show these "planetary strength feats" they made a point of including Supes and WW in both of them. It is a strength feat for Diana. You (and I mean the collective you) can try to argue that Clark was pulling most of it by himself, but there is just as little evidence to support that claim.
I'm going to start closing threads, warning people and declaring thread winners based on the side which trolls, spams and bashes the least. Then I'll make a KMC CBvF leader board thread showing the declared winners. The leader board statistics will be CBvF law regarding outcomes of threads.
Or everybody could stop with the butthurt and act semi-normal.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Back-peddling is what you do in every thread including this one.Who is everyone here? Superman was obviously weakened there. You presented that scan as if Etrigan buying them "some time" restored them when it was blatantly obvious that it wasn't the case by the same scan. That's why I asked, do you even read bro?
Not really but in the interest of keeping this thread alive I will ignore the shot at me.
Anyone who read this thread. Not really, as he was almost fully recharged and had even more time to rest after that. The scan indicated that they had enough time to regain most of their strength and an additional more two pages of floating around.
Yup.