Khan Noonien Singh vs. Yoda

Started by Stealth Moose201 pages

I'm sorry, you need to prove that Khan can beat people who can predict the immediate future.

Klingons do not fit this.

This thread ended the moment Yoda got Clone Wars feats.

The accuracy debate is more interesting.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
I'm sorry, you need to prove that Khan can beat people who can predict the immediate future.

Klingons do not fit this.

Yoda couldn't even predict he was going to lose to Palpatine or that Dooku would flee.

Khan wins, easily.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yoda couldn't even predict he was going to lose to Palpatine or that Dooku would flee.

Khan wins, easily.

Yoda accurately predicts that clones are going to assassinate him and takes them out within seconds. Against other Force users, it is less helpful, because it only provides immediate precognition.

Khan doesn't possess any kind of precognition. Furthermore, inferior Jedi such as Obi-Wan and Anakin block blaster bolts fired more rapidly, even from almost point blank range, especially in the beginning of RotS.

Khan loses badly.

Originally posted by The Scenario

This thread ended the moment Yoda got Clone Wars feats.

The accuracy debate is more interesting.

Again that doesn't make his other feats disappear.

Khan wins and has never definitively missed.

Originally posted by Stealth Moose
Yoda accurately predicts that clones are going to assassinate him and takes them out within seconds. Against other Force users, it is less helpful, because it only provides immediate precognition.

Khan doesn't possess any kind of precognition. Furthermore, inferior Jedi such as Obi-Wan and Anakin block blaster bolts fired more rapidly, even from almost point blank range, especially in the beginning of RotS.

Khan loses badly.

Yes, two clones right behind him. Yoda wasn't aware Palpatine was going to blast him as he slowly raised his hand.

Obi could not even defeat Jango Fett in combat. Awful.

Khan wins, gloriously.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Again that doesn't make his other feats disappear.

Khan wins and has never definitively missed.

But did he hit the ground?

Originally posted by The Scenario
But did he hit the ground?
Not answering any more of your questions. You lost that right when you trolled.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Not answering any more of your questions. You lost that right when you trolled.

So you concede?

Originally posted by The Scenario
So you concede?
I answered the same questions for pages. You are becoming a dishonest debater. You need to pull yourself back and concede.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I answered the same questions for pages. You are becoming a dishonest debater. You need to pull yourself back and concede.

You never answered the question once. You dodged and tried to change the subject, or just repeated your stance without even acknowledging a question was asked.

Did Khan hit the ground or not?

Did Khan hit the wall or not?

The fact you are ignoring is that yes, Khan hit the ground or walls during his fight, and those are clear, definitive misses. If you are going to refuse to debate properly, you have already conceded.

Otherwise, answer the question.

51 pages of Everyone vs. quanchi, this is frigging priceless! 🙂

Originally posted by The Scenario
You never answered the question once. You dodged and tried to change the subject, or just repeated your stance without even acknowledging a question was asked.

Did Khan hit the ground or not?

Did Khan hit the wall or not?

The fact you are ignoring is that yes, Khan hit the ground or walls during his fight, and those are clear, definitive misses. If you are going to refuse to debate properly, you have already conceded.

Otherwise, answer the question.

Again you lost privileges when you started trolling.

Originally posted by DTM
51 pages of Everyone vs. quanchi, this is frigging priceless! 🙂
I've been owning them for 51 pages.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Again you lost privileges when you started trolling.

Again, you trolled yourself. Those were your posts with the words switched.

Please, keep making excuses to avoid questions you can't answer. Did Khan hit the ground?

Originally posted by The Scenario
Again, you trolled yourself. Those were your posts with the words switched.

Please, keep making excuses to avoid questions you can't answer. Did Khan hit the ground?

No, I cited a characters words and have proof of him hitting his targets. You blew it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, I cited a characters words and have proof of him hitting his targets. You blew it.

Yet using your exact argument of "could be something the camera didn't see" is somehow me trolling? You should be flattered I saw fit to adopt your debating style, even if just temporarily.

So did Khan shoot the ground?

Originally posted by The Scenario
Yet using your exact argument of "could be something the camera didn't see" is somehow me trolling? You should be flattered I saw fit to adopt your debating style, even if just temporarily.

So did Khan shoot the ground?

Again, you did not believe your own stance which means you have no honor.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Again, you did not believe your own stance which means you have no honor.

Reading comprehension. I made it clear up front that I was making a point about your argument. Of course I didn't believe it, it was for demonstration purposes only. Did you actually think I was being serious when I said Kirk could mean that Khan took the Klingons out to dinner? It was your argument, echoing when you claimed that things could be off camera and therefore proved nothing.

I'm sorry you didn't understand the point, but you need to calm down. Just take a deep breath and think about the question.

"Did Khan shoot the ground?"

Originally posted by The Scenario
Reading comprehension. I made it clear up front that I was making a point about your argument. Of course I didn't believe it, it was for demonstration purposes only. Did you actually think I was being serious when I said Kirk could mean that Khan took the Klingons out to dinner? It was your argument, echoing when you claimed that things could be off camera and therefore proved nothing.

I'm sorry you didn't understand the point, but you need to calm down. Just take a deep breath and think about the question.

"Did Khan shoot the ground?"

You lied which makes me call into question everything about your posting history.