Khan Noonien Singh vs. Yoda

Started by Lestov16201 pages

Quan is so proficient at dodging that he could probably avoid a superluminal bullet fired at him from point-blank range 😆

Originally posted by quanchi112
You lied which makes me call into question everything about your posting history.

Quote where I lied. I was up front about the fact I was parodying your argument.

Now did Khan shoot the ground?

Originally posted by Lestov16
Quan is so proficient at dodging that he could probably avoid a superluminal bullet fired at him from point-blank range 😆
I already answered this dishonest poster. I love how you feel the need to weigh in like we care what you think.

Originally posted by The Scenario
Quote where I lied. I was up front about the fact I was parodying your argument.

Now did Khan shoot the ground?

You were not parroting mine since mine had indisputable proof whereas yours did not.

Originally posted by quanchi112
another concession.

Originally posted by quanchi112
yoda wins

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Khan wins based off the movies, attention whore.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Khan wins based off the movies, attention whore.

Originally posted by quanchi112
u are wrong. blatantly wrong.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You were not parroting mine since mine had indisputable proof whereas yours did not.

Mine also had indisputable proof, but it didn't stop you from making things up.

Did Khan shoot the ground?

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Khan wins.

Originally posted by The Scenario
Mine also had indisputable proof, but it didn't stop you from making things up.

Did Khan shoot the ground?

No, yours has not been unlike my proof.

Spoiler:
Both our points were the same level of disputable. Hence why stupidity like 'could be something the camera/microphone didn't see/hear' doesn't work against either. Also, you never posted any proof.

Did Khan shoot the ground?

Originally posted by The Scenario
Spoiler:
Both our points were the same level of disputable. Hence why stupidity like 'could be something the camera/microphone didn't see/hear' doesn't work against either. Also, you never posted any proof.

Did Khan shoot the ground?

No, my posts had proof along with Kirk verifying it. Yours did not.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, yours has not been unlike my proof.

Whhat f**king proof have you EVER posted? You never provide not one iota of evidence, thats your operational procedure.

Fact remains, Khan's shots struck ground and walls, your ascertations that the shots bounced off of living targets not only have no evidence to back it, it is literally impossible for it to do so.

Now do more flip-flops like a moron and pontificate even more.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, my posts had proof along with Kirk verifying it. Yours did not.

What images, videos, or other evidence have you actually posted? You didn't even provide a source for the Kirk quote.

I have clear screenshots and .gifs of blasts hitting the ground or walls. Do you agree that Khan hit the ground?

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Whhat f**king proof have you EVER posted? You never provide not one iota of evidence, thats your operational procedure.

Fact remains, Khan's shots struck ground and walls, your ascertations that the shots bounced off of living targets not only have no evidence to back it, it is literally impossible for it to do so.

Now do more flip-flops like a moron and pontificate even more.

You just described yourself, rage boy.

Again I posted evidence and cited Kirk's words so there's that.

Originally posted by The Scenario
What images, videos, or other evidence have you actually posted? You didn't even provide a source for the Kirk quote.

I have clear screenshots and .gifs of blasts hitting the ground or walls. Do you agree that Khan hit the ground?

I provided the clip pages ago. Kirk's quote is a fact. Do you disagree ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I provided the clip pages ago. Kirk's quote is a fact. Do you disagree ?

Well if it was ages ago I think everyone will need a reminder. I'll agree if you do.

If I post evidence of Khan shooting the ground, will you agree?

Originally posted by The Scenario
Well if it was ages ago I think everyone will need a reminder. I'll agree if you do.

If I post evidence of Khan shooting the ground, will you agree?

Again, you agreed you were debating dishonestly. I was not. You don't adhere to debating ethics like I do. Try harder. Be better.

I never agreed I was debating dishonestly. I was up front and told you that I would be using your argument. That is a reductio ad absurdum, if anything. A legitimate debate tactic, look it up.

Did Khan hit the ground?

Originally posted by The Scenario
I never agreed I was debating dishonestly. I was up front and told you that I would be using your argument. That is a reductio ad absurdum, if anything. A legitimate debate tactic, look it up.

Did Khan hit the ground?

You were using dishonest tactics so you'll need to be punished.