Originally posted by quanchi112
You just described yourself, rage boy.
No, I was describing you, as in Quanchi112, as in the fool who quite literally pulled an absolutely unprovable bullshit excuse to maintain his claim of 100% perfect accuracy, despite the fact that he earlier was vehedemently insisting we all go only by what was portrayed onscreen.
You are Quanchi112, and you are a hypocritical hypocondriact.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Again I posted evidence and cited Kirk's words so there's that.
Where?
Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
No, I was describing you, as in Quanchi112, as in the fool who quite literally pulled an absolutely unprovable bullshit excuse to maintain his claim of 100% perfect accuracy, despite the fact that he earlier was vehedemently insisting we all go only by what was portrayed onscreen.
A big fat lol at that. 😆 😂 🤣
Originally posted by TheGodKiller
I recall the recent time when he was boasting how he outdebated Scenario in their bz, by selectively citing specific portions of a judge's(Digi's) post, all the while conveniently ignoring that said judge(Digi) like most others gave Scenario the winner's vote.A big fat lol at that. 😆 😂 🤣
Yeah, see, one cannot be out debating the other, unless one wins said debate. It simply is not possible.
Originally posted by The ScenarioLook scenario you need to apologize to me right now and swear you'll never go down that dark road again. Only then will questions be answered and forgiveness can be given.
Did you look it up?And did Khan hit the ground?
Oh, and you avoided the question earlier, but are you going to post the Kirk quote?
Originally posted by Darkstorm ZeroWe go by what we see not your speculation. Khan never missed as the clip proved.
No, I was describing you, as in Quanchi112, as in the fool who quite literally pulled an absolutely unprovable bullshit excuse to maintain his claim of 100% perfect accuracy, despite the fact that he earlier was vehedemently insisting we all go only by what was portrayed onscreen.You are Quanchi112, and you are a hypocritical hypocondriact.
Where?
I am mr. Objective. Thats what they called me.
I posted the clip and discussed Kirk's words. Boom.
Originally posted by TheGodKillerDue to the characters but I outdebated him. I cited that, tuff guy.
I recall the recent time when he was boasting how he outdebated Scenario in their bz, by selectively citing specific portions of a judge's(Digi's) post, all the while conveniently ignoring that said judge(Digi) like most others gave Scenario the winner's vote.A big fat lol at that. 😆 😂 🤣
Originally posted by quanchi112
Due to the characters but I outdebated him. I cited that, tuff guy.
You lost the debate anyways. Time to move on instead of sulking over your loss. 🙂
I would appreciate it if you would keep track of things.
I know there are a lot of people posting, but I am still expecting your participation here. Without your input, there is not much to debate. We are nearing closing arguments, anyway, it seems. Your posts feel less invested than they were earlier.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Why can't he pull both triggers at the same time ?We see him effectively dual wield the weapons at charging opponents which is more difficult than firing two weapons at a single target.
Yoda hides on a distant planet after his epic failure. Terrible. Weak.
He cannot because, per your modus operandi, we do not seem him pull both triggers at the same time. He must either pull the trigger to the repeating weapon, or angle the cannon and then pull the trigger to fire it.
He does an admirable job of using both weapons, switching between them skilfully when the situation arises. Given the disparaging weight and shape of his two weapons, are you certain it would be less difficult for him to fire them simultaneously? Even if you do not, Khan must think so, or else why would he not use the tactical advantage of wielding both guns at once?
Yoda survives wartime, trains a new generation, which leads to the fall of the Sith. That sounds more like a success to me. Your personal opinions of the character do not change the canon.
Continue?
1
Originally posted by quanchi112
Look scenario you need to apologize to me right now and swear you'll never go down that dark road again. Only then will questions be answered and forgiveness can be given.
Apologize for being completely honest with you? When I told you that I was just making a point?
You really should look up Reductio ad Absurdum. Also, calm down.
Anyway, did Khan shoot the ground?
Originally posted by quanchi112
We go by what we see not your speculation. Khan never missed as the clip proved.
No, because we see Khan's shots hit walls and floors, despite your denial and contradictory asspulls.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I am mr. Objective. Thats what they called me.
Nobody has ever called you that besides your imaginary friends.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I posted the clip and discussed Kirk's words. Boom.
A hyperbolic statement from a fallible character and your beer goggled view of a clip that anyone with a rational mind can also see and come to a completely different conclusion. Your supposed evidence is completely invalidated by what that proof actually proves, dumbass.
Originally posted by quanchi112
One can outdebate the other by arguing for Thor against the Lt but will ultimately lose. Try and actually think.
Then it's not out debating, it's arguing a lost cause. Like trying to prove you have a rational mind.
[list]The Commandments of Fanboyism.
I. Thou shalt not adhere to logic if and when it impedes the progress of your biased argument.
II. Thou shalt insult the opposition as a diversionary tactic when thy arguments are proven horribly false.
III. Thou shalt not admit under any circumstances that thou art lost concerning thy argument.
IV. Thou shalt use hyperbole liberally throughout thy argument.
V. Thou shalt not reply directly to any well-formulated rebuttals or questions.
VI. Thou shalt always retreat back to an earlier defeated point when thy latest point runs aground.
VII. Thou shalt not respect the equally valid sources of thy opposition and should seek to destroy their credibility with extreme prejudice.
VIII. Thou shalt play the victim when thy argument is being destroyed and thy own personal ignorance coming under fire.
IX. Thou shalt exclusively debate topics which deal with thy most favorite, unreproachable characters.
X. Thou art infallible in so much as thou crusade against the opposition with all the lowly weapons of thy craft.
Amen.[/list]
Originally posted by TheGodKiller
I can't believe that you actually admitted that Russell is to Dorf what Thor is to the Living Tribunal. 😆Profiled.
Originally posted by TheGodKillerAt no point did I compare it to my battlezone. I simply destroyed his theory that one cannot outdebate the other and lose. He has a very small mind.
Then you concede that Ganondorf is so much more powerful than Russell that no matter how good a debater is, they can't win a bz between those 2 characters. 👆You lost the debate anyways. Time to move on instead of sulking over your loss. 🙂
Originally posted by TheGodKillerI outdebated him. This is about Khan vs. Yoda. Stay on point you emotional wreck.
Then you concede that Ganondorf is so much more powerful than Russell that no matter how good a debater is, they can't win a bz between those 2 characters. 👆You lost the debate anyways. Time to move on instead of sulking over your loss. 🙂