Originally posted by h1a8
Ill condense this. You have to debate more efficiently. This is ridiculous.1. Your sarcasm sucks. It is confusing and not written well.
2. I was looking for Thor where the other characters are, not his hammer. I barely even looked above the force field. That's why I missed it.
3. I didn't say I can throw a jab, hook, straight, etc. punch 80mph. I said I can swing my hand that fast. I know this because I can throw a baseball that fast. So if I do the EXACT motion of a baseball throw to strike something then yes I can attack with my hand at 80mph or faster. It's impossible to throw a baseball 80mph by swinging your hand slower. So how am I a liar? I never lied once on this forum in my entire time here. Not ever!!!!
4. Ok so Mary deflected it with her hand. Is that dumb writing or legitimate? Take a pick.
5. It seems you don't understand sarcasm, and I used it correctly. I didn't lowball Tyrant since I was making a point that energy beams cancelling out doesn't make you equals. I said if they did then Glads and Tyrants are equals (they aren't).
6. Thor's hammer doesn't always move very fast when he throws it. This is comics dude. Nor is his average hammer throw is superior to a non holding back Superman's punch. Thor's hammer didn't land in the same area at all. A few feet away = not in the same area. Thor's hammer has to hit at the same time in order for the hit to stack. Otherwise the shield is good as new after the hit (since you said it didn't weaken). Failure to understand this =/= making shit up.
7. I disagree that an average Thor hammer throw is superior to a high end Gladiator flex.
8. The SAME colors use to illustrate physical hits proves that it's possible for warlock to have blasted. Otherwise, why did the writer use the exact same color scheme?
9. We also go on the intentions of the writer. DD is significantly more durable than Thanos in the blunt and cut force area and somewhat greater in the energy durability area.
10. DS never tried to erase nor teleport nor omega sanction but rather destroy in those couple of times it didn't work.
11. Magus with the IG didn't try to kill Thanos with the punch. So of course Thanos prior could have survived the same hit. Actually ALL high herald level beings could have survived that punch. It wasn't a good feat IMO. I literally spit on that so called feat.
12. Non of the feats you named is superior to DD tanking beams that, at half power, vaporized missiles that Superman couldn't damage in the slightest. But keep naming feats. Maybe you will come across one that's remotely close.
So that you take me seriously. Galactus level beings, cosmic cube beings, etc. don't on average vaporize shit that's astronomically more durable than Superman. Yes Galactus level beings can kill or one shot heralds but that is a drop of water compared to a lake of water.
13. PG Thor operated no more than 2x stronger than a non holding back Thor. Normal Thor has greater strength feats than that PG Thor did. Yet he busted Thanos face by not even landing a good hammer slam.
You disagree that DS can't erase Thanos
since
1. Durability affects ability to be erased
2. DS has no erasing powers but rather disintegrating powers
3. DS disintegrating power in a forum fight is less than what was shown against the missiles.
Am I right?
I answered every one of your points, just deleted the words in the quotes. You failed on that font.
1. Because you can't understand anything
2. So you were wrong again. Concession accepted.
3. So you think you can punch twice as fast as the fastest punch ever recorded. I literally don't have to prove you wrong to know you're a god damned liar.
4. I literally said by bringing it up that you don't want to play the low feats game since Mary tanked it. And you evidently don't since you want to scream pis at the first sight of it. Way to show me.
5. That'd be all good and well if you previously haven't tried to lowball Tyrant because Gladiator stalemated him. And weren't previously proven wrong about it.
Or if Tyrant had anything to do with anything stated ever in this thread.
6. And Thor's hammer moved that fast in that comic since we see his impact the same as the others, and his hammer farther away. So you have no point there. And yes it was.
A few feet away isn't the same general area? Well, I'd say it is, but you know, it is.
So you're basically saying they have to hit right down to the same microsecond to stack? Prove that line of thought.
7. Then you're blatantly trolling, and should be reported immediately. Thor's most common attack that regularly damages people Gladiator couldn't dream of damaging isn't more powerful than Gladiator flexing?
You know how many more times this would make Gladiator than Thor when he was trying? Which, of course, Gladiator hasn't the feats to begin to contend with Thor, and Thor's averages shit on Gladiator's highest.
8. Warlock's blast was green in every single panel of that comic. Show Warlock in that comic having a purple sheen in his gem.
Or don't concede and then keep arguing a non point.
And he used it because he used that color scheme for attacks with no energy, and it shows that he hit it.
9. The writer's intention was never at any point in time in that comic to show DD being more durable than Thanos who hails from a completely different comic.
DD has absolutely no feats to contend with Thanos' durability. And the only time a sword was used against DD, you thought it almost cut DD in half, which you changed to a quarter.
10. So we're left with Darkseid never erasing anyone more durable than Thanos. You'd think he'd use it on the people who you know, are immediate threats to his existence.
11. Show any high herald taking 4 shots from the IG.
12. So, Darkseid destroying missiles is superior to Galactus exerting himself to the point of hunger?
And there's where I report you.
You literally just said that Thanos tanking attacks so crazily above Darkseid's level don't count because "on average", which is basically stating that it doesn't count because Thanos took it.
Crazy thought, but if Thanos has that many feats against really high beings, then he might be that durable. As opposed to just taking attacks less than half of Darkseid's power because they managed to destroy missiles.
Actually, at no point ever do I believe Galactus has ever been portrayed at half of Darkseid's power. But I'm sure you have scans to prove me wrong.
13. If normal Thor has better feats, then that means he was weaker than a bloodlusted Thor with a Power Gem. It doesn't take a child to figure that one out.
But yeah, show the math to show Thor was only twice as strong with an infinite potential gem on his forehead that was only making him stronger.
I disagree because Darkseid has never erased anyone near Thanos' durability level and you keep dancing around that fact.
But 3 is cute and retardedly far from anything I said. Thanos is more durable than missiles... by far.
You also failed to answer half of anything important. But keep condensing things, maybe I'll forget points.
Keep failing to provide proof of anything you say as well.