Hancock vs. Zod

Originally posted by juggerman
I've provided two scene worth of proof. You just wanna ignore it and write it off

No, you haven't, because even if those two scenes prove that the aura is real, they don't prove that Superman is the one with the ability.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No, you haven't, because even if those two scenes prove that the aura is real, they don't prove that Superman is the one with the ability.

They do since he's the one with powers.

Originally posted by juggerman
They do since he's the one with powers.

Prove that he had the aura and not Lois or some other person.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Prove that he had the aura and not Lois or some other person.

What other person was there?

For one, Lois was there both times.

Originally posted by Silent Master
For one, Lois was there both times.

And whom else? You said "or some other person" in addition to Lois and Superman

Who better to have an invisible aura than an invisible person.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Who better to have an invisible aura than an invisible person.

Nice troll. Anyway, look at the scene itself to get your answer. Superman catches Lois and turns her away from the fire. The directer was clearly showing she needed to be protected, and that Kal was the one protecting her. So based on what we were clearly shown, she wasn't able to protect herself by any means. But i'm sure you'll ignore all that

Your speculation aside, do you have any proof?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Your speculation aside, do you have any proof?

Proof is in the scene as i've said

According to your own argument, Lois is the only person that was protected by the "invisible aura" therefore all "evidence" points to her being the one with the power.

Originally posted by Silent Master
According to your own argument, Lois is the only person that was protected by the "invisible aura" therefore all "evidence" points to her being the one with the power.

Negative. Superman's aura surrounds himself as well. Didn't think that needed to be spelled out to you tho

Originally posted by juggerman
Negative. Superman's aura surrounds himself as well. Didn't think that needed to be spelled out to you tho

You still haven't proven that Superman has an aura.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You still haven't proven that Superman has an aura.

Proven in the scenes

Originally posted by juggerman
Proven in the scenes

Again, According to your own argument, Lois is the only person that was protected by the "invisible aura" in those scenes, therefore all "evidence" points to her being the one with the power.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, According to your own argument, Lois is the only person that was protected by the "invisible aura" in those scenes, therefore all "evidence" points to her being the one with the power.

Again, Superman's aura surrounds himself as well. Didn't think that needed to be spelled out to you tho

Originally posted by juggerman
Again, Superman's aura surrounds himself as well. Didn't think that needed to be spelled out to you tho

You haven't proven that Superman is the one with the "invisible aura".

Originally posted by Silent Master
You haven't proven that Superman is the one with the "invisible aura".

Look at the scene itself to get your answer. Superman catches Lois and turns her away from the fire. The directer was clearly showing she needed to be protected, and that Kal was the one protecting her. So based on what we were clearly shown, she wasn't able to protect herself by any means. But i'm sure you'll ignore all that

Originally posted by juggerman
Look at the scene itself to get your answer. Superman catches Lois and turns her away from the fire. The directer was clearly showing she needed to be protected, and that Kal was the one protecting her. So based on what we were clearly shown, she wasn't able to protect herself by any means. But i'm sure you'll ignore all that

Your speculation aside, do you have any proof?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Your speculation aside, do you have any proof?

Proof is in the scene as i've said