Originally posted by juggerman
SS and Doc Man have powers that could easily explain it. But i'm sure you'd still call PIS right?
I'll ask again; Let's put it this way, say the feats in question were performed by Thor, Silver Surfer, Hancock, Doc Manhattan or Meteor-Man; would you still be arguing that it's a "invisibale aura"?
Originally posted by Silent Master
I'll ask again; Let's put it this way, say the feats in question were performed by Thor, Silver Surfer, Hancock, Doc Manhattan or Meteor-Man; would you still be arguing that it's a "invisibale aura"?
I'll ask again, you'd still call PIS right? Cuz they didn't outright say "Hey, i saved you with this specific power just now".
If no power was shown being used, I'd call it an inconsistency/plot-hole/PIS etc. Now, 3rd time asking
I'll ask again; Let's put it this way, say the feats in question were performed by Thor, Silver Surfer, Hancock, Doc Manhattan or Meteor-Man; would you still be arguing that it's a "invisibale aura"?
Originally posted by Silent Master
If no power was shown being used, I'd call it an inconsistency/plot-hole/PIS etc. Now, 3rd time askingI'll ask again; Let's put it this way, say the feats in question were performed by Thor, Silver Surfer, Hancock, Doc Manhattan or Meteor-Man; would you still be arguing that it's a "invisibale aura"?
Power was shown being used. Twice. Consistent.
Off topic. But i won't run from questions like you do. I'd call PIS on Thor only. But then again i'd call PIS on Thor using Heat Vision as well as this is not a power of his. This is a power of Superman's no matter how much you cry about it.
SS and Doc Man have powers that easily explain it. Hancock didn't know all of his powers so it's possible he has a power like that. It's been way too long since i've seen Meteor Man so i can't say for sure.
Originally posted by juggerman
Power was shown being used. Twice. Consistent.Off topic. But i won't run from questions like you do. I'd call PIS on Thor only. But then again i'd call PIS on Thor using Heat Vision as well as this is not a power of his. This is a power of Superman's no matter how much you cry about it.
SS and Doc Man have powers that easily explain it. Hancock didn't know all of his powers so it's possible he has a power like that. It's been way too long since i've seen Meteor Man so i can't say for sure.
Incorrect, there are two scenes whose inconsistencies you're attempting to explain by using a power from the comics...the problem with that is that the comics aren't canon to the movieverse.
You might as well say "Wizard did it".
Movie Thor using heat vision wouldn't be PIS, because the movieverse is a seperate universe, just like movie Spiderman having organic web shooters wasn't PIS.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Incorrect, there are two scenes whose inconsistencies you're attempting to explain by using a power from the comics...the problem with that is that the comics aren't canon to the movieverse.You might as well say "Wizard did it".
Correct. You just don't like it. Too bad
You could if you were too dumb to see what happened
Originally posted by juggerman
Never did. But if that helps you sleep at night go right ahead and believe that
Really?
Originally posted by Silent Master
Incorrect, there are two scenes whose inconsistencies you're attempting to explain by using a power from the comics...the problem with that is that the comics aren't canon to the movieverse.
Originally posted by juggerman
Correct. You just don't like it. Too bad
Originally posted by juggerman
Yes really. The "correct" was meant toward your "incorrect". It was worded weird I'll admit but there you have it
Do you have any hard evidence that the two scenes you mentioned were actually meant to establish a new power for Superman and not just examples of inconsistencies that are rather common in movies?
Originally posted by Silent Master
Do you have any hard evidence that the two scenes you mentioned were actually meant to establish a new power for Superman and not just examples of inconsistencies that are rather common in movies?
I have the two scenes that are consistent with eachother. Do you believe PIS is consistently shown that way?
Originally posted by Silent Master
You have two scenes that you think shows an unnamed and invisible power, I'm asking if you have any hard proof that your opinion is correct.BTW, I've already answered whether or not I believe the scenes are examples of inconsistencies/plot-holes or PIS etc.
Hard proof is the scene.
That's not the question i asked. But keep dancing.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Hard proof would be someone in the movie metioning it or the audience actually being able to see the field; baring that an interview or commentary from the DVD when it comes out.
Photosynthesis wasn't mentioned, no one actually SAW it happen and i highly doubt it will be mentioned in the DVD. Do we also say it didn't occur? Maybe we chalk the trees up to PIS?
Originally posted by juggerman
Photosynthesis wasn't mentioned, no one actually SAW it happen and i highly doubt it will be mentioned in the DVD. Do we also say it didn't occur? Maybe we chalk the trees up to PIS?
If you can't prove that the power exists in the MOS verse, then it remains a power that you made up to explain away inconsistencies in the movie.