I'll tell you what, if this was really an attempt to give MOS Superman a "invisible aura" like comic Supes, then you should have no trouble tracking down a comment from someone involved in the movie or DC stating it.
Otherwise, this is just you making up powers in order to explain away plot-holes/PIS.
Originally posted by Silent Master
I'll tell you what, if this was really an attempt to give MOS Superman a "invisible aura" like comic Supes, then you should have no trouble tracking down a comment from someone involved in the movie or DC stating it.Otherwise, this is just you making up powers in order to explain away plot-holes/PIS.
Didn't Snyder state there would be a power shown that wasn't shown in a Superman film before? Or was that just a rumor?
Either way like i said it's proven in the scene. You trying to ignore it and call PIS doesn't make it go away
Originally posted by juggerman
I'm using a power showing in the film. So no, i'm not
Again, You're using a power from the comics to explain inconsistencies in the film. so yes, you are.
Let's put it this way, say the feats in question were performed by Thor, Silver Surfer, Hancock, Doc Manhattan or Meteor-Man; would you still be arguing that it's a "invisibale aura"?
Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, You're using a power from the comics to explain inconsistencies in the film. so yes, you are.Let's put it this way, say the feats in question were performed by Thor, Silver Surfer, Hancock, Doc Manhattan or Meteor-Man; would you still be arguing that it's a "invisibale aura"?
SS and Doc Man have powers that could easily explain it. But i'm sure you'd still call PIS right?