Hancock vs. Zod

Started by Silent Master25 pages
Originally posted by juggerman
Proof is in the scene as i've said

No it's not....movies are full of these kind of mistakes......that isn't proof that the characters in the movies have some kind of invisible power.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No it's not....movies are full of these kind of mistakes......that isn't proof that the characters in the movies have some kind of invisible power.

It is. You're just in denial cuz you wanna disregard the feat. It's consistent

So...has anyone brought up how Zod can hurt Hancock yet? I mean train feat seems to top anything Zod could do save for an orbital body slam or something.

Originally posted by wakkawakkawakka
So...has anyone brought up how Zod can hurt Hancock yet? I mean train feat seems to top anything Zod could do save for an orbital body slam or something.

It's been talked about yes

I'll tell you what, if this was really an attempt to give MOS Superman a "invisible aura" like comic Supes, then you should have no trouble tracking down a comment from someone involved in the movie or DC stating it.

Otherwise, this is just you making up powers in order to explain away plot-holes/PIS.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I'll tell you what, if this was really an attempt to give MOS Superman a "invisible aura" like comic Supes, then you should have no trouble tracking down a comment from someone involved in the movie or DC stating it.

Otherwise, this is just you making up powers in order to explain away plot-holes/PIS.

Didn't Snyder state there would be a power shown that wasn't shown in a Superman film before? Or was that just a rumor?

Either way like i said it's proven in the scene. You trying to ignore it and call PIS doesn't make it go away

Like I said, post a comment someone from the movie/DC or this is just you making up powers.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Like I said, post a comment someone from the movie/DC or this is just you making up powers.

Believe what you want. Lois was protected by his arua. Pretend otherwise all you like

Originally posted by juggerman
Believe what you want. Lois was protected by his arua. Pretend otherwise all you like

A power that you made up.

Originally posted by Silent Master
A power that you made up.

A power that DC comics made up for the character of Superman, which interestingly enough is what this movie character is based on

Originally posted by juggerman
A power that DC comics made up for the character of Superman, which interestingly enough is what this movie character is based on

DC comics isn't canon to the MOS movieverse. So yes, it's a power you made up.

I didn't make it up. It's a power that DC comics made up for the character of Superman, which interestingly enough is what this movie character is based on

Originally posted by juggerman
I didn't make it up. It's a power that DC comics made up for the character of Superman, which interestingly enough is what this movie character is based on

Again, DC comics isn't canon to the movieverse.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, DC comics isn't canon to the movieverse.

Never said it was

Originally posted by juggerman
Never said it was

You're trying to use a power existing in the comics as proof that it exists in the movies. so yes, you are.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You're trying to use a power existing in the comics as proof that it exists in the movies. so yes, you are.

I'm using a power showing in the film. So no, i'm not

Originally posted by juggerman
I'm using a power showing in the film. So no, i'm not

You're using a power from the comics to explain inconsistencies in the film. so yes, you are.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You're using a power from the comics to explain inconsistencies in the film. so yes, you are.

I'm using a power showing in the film. So no, i'm not

Originally posted by juggerman
I'm using a power showing in the film. So no, i'm not

Again, You're using a power from the comics to explain inconsistencies in the film. so yes, you are.

Let's put it this way, say the feats in question were performed by Thor, Silver Surfer, Hancock, Doc Manhattan or Meteor-Man; would you still be arguing that it's a "invisibale aura"?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, You're using a power from the comics to explain inconsistencies in the film. so yes, you are.

Let's put it this way, say the feats in question were performed by Thor, Silver Surfer, Hancock, Doc Manhattan or Meteor-Man; would you still be arguing that it's a "invisibale aura"?

SS and Doc Man have powers that could easily explain it. But i'm sure you'd still call PIS right?