Originally posted by abhilegendYou still aren't grasping it.
What are you saying? It is the comparison of superman's best strength feats from 3 eras, byrne era. post death era and after Loeb to thor's strength feats. Do you agree? Or do you want to go comic by comic route? Good luck with that.Anything that can't be quantified.
Originally posted by curryman
Don't flame Abhi for wanting to finish this tourney before heading into a BZ match.And Rage vs Abhi totally needs to happen, hopefully over something not as arbitrary as Superman's strength always being higher than Thor's (very weird way of phrasing it). If it happens then it should be something as simple as who is stronger.
That's understandable, I don't care about that.
Yeah, but his battle zone challenge was in response to be saying that Superman is not automatically > Thor in every comic or whatever. Which is why I'm having such a fun time with it.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Even rage would admit superman is stronger than thor. There is no need for a BZ for that.
I don't understand what kind of difference the two of you are seeing between being stronger and always being stronger.
Do you think that Thor would be stronger if the stars were aligned correctly?
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
That's understandable, I don't care about that.Yeah, but his battle zone challenge was in response to be saying that Superman is not automatically > Thor in every comic or whatever. Which is why I'm having such a fun time with it.
Originally posted by abhilegend
What are you saying? It is the comparison of superman's best strength feats from 3 eras, byrne era. post death era and after Loeb to thor's strength feats. Do you agree? Or do you want to go comic by comic route? Good luck with that.Anything that can't be quantified.
What? So you want to compare Superman's best strength feats from across three different era's to what, Thor's overall best?
You see, caveats like that is why we probably need to discuss this shit in depth. What do you mean anything that can't be quantified? I'm guessing any high end space cheese feats, anything with Mjolnir, and even something like Thor locking strength with someone? I'm also guessing anything with narration is automatically hyperbole?
Originally posted by abhilegend
That'd be impossible to do. You want to compare every superman comic to every thor comic? Are you on crack bro?
Why do you think I'm laughing? I wasn't sure whether you were trolling me or not taking it in. You need to carefully read what you challenged me in response to.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusIts a lock. Abhi really don't even grasp it. He will back out.
That's understandable, I don't care about that.Yeah, but his battle zone challenge was in response to be saying that Superman is not automatically > Thor in every comic or whatever. Which is why I'm having such a fun time with it.
Originally posted by curryman
But if he's stronger than he's stronger.I don't understand what kind of difference the two of you are seeing between being stronger and always being stronger.
Do you think that Thor would be stronger if the stars were aligned correctly?
He wants to compare every superman comic to every thor comic.
facepalm
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
What? So you want to compare Superman's best strength feats from across three different era's to what, Thor's overall best?You see, caveats like that is why we probably need to discuss this shit in depth. What do you mean anything that can't be quantified? I'm guessing any high end space cheese feats, anything with Mjolnir, and even something like Thor locking strength with someone? I'm also guessing anything with narration is automatically hyperbole?
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Why do you think I'm laughing? I wasn't sure whether you were trolling me or not taking it in. You need to carefully read what you challenged me in response to.