Russell Edgington vs Edward Cullen

Started by quanchi11219 pages

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Nope. Didn't bella's dad shoot one and it bounced off?
You made the claim.

^The bullet bouncing claim has been used in many Twilight threads but no one has yet been able to give a source for it. Maybe dadude could, though shouldn't be official til that happens.

Russ is somewhat faster, Ed is somewhat stronger.

Russ has greater regeneration, Ed is more durable.

With the mind reading to compensate for speed, this should be a fair match ending in someone's head coming off in the first window of opportunity.

Originally posted by BloodRain
^The bullet bouncing claim has been used in many Twilight threads but no one has yet been able to give a source for it. Maybe dadude could, though shouldn't be official til that happens.

Russ is somewhat faster, Ed is somewhat stronger.

Russ has greater regeneration, Ed is more durable.

With the mind reading to compensate for speed, this should be a fair match ending in someone's head coming off in the first window of opportunity.

Russell wins. That's all you needed to say. You are wrong about a great many things.

Wrong about what?

Originally posted by BloodRain
Wrong about what?
Edward being stronger. Laughable.

Eddy is stronger.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Edward being stronger. Laughable.

If you believe tipping a car is above stopping a van, thats your call.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Eddy is stronger.
Nope.

Originally posted by BloodRain
If you believe tipping a car is above stopping a van, thats your call.
I don't base my decision off of comparing feats alone. Horrible way to debate.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I don't base my decision off of comparing feats alone. Horrible way to debate.

You know it'd be easier to just say why you think he's stronger instead of.. talking.

If you don't base their strength on their strength, what method do you use?

Originally posted by BloodRain
You know it'd be easier to just say why you think he's stronger instead of.. talking.
Shrugging his shoulders, head slapping off vamps heads, being vastly stronger than powerful peer combining.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
If you don't base their strength on their strength, what method do you use?
Peer by peer comparison, strength feats, and portrayals. Not just one aspect.

If apples=apples and oranges=oranges,
How do compare apples to oranges?

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
If apples=apples and oranges=oranges,
How do compare apples to oranges?
You make no sense. Comparing everything not just one aspect and ignoring context, etc.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Shrugging his shoulders, head slapping off vamps heads, being vastly stronger than powerful peer combining.

Tossing humans and decap isn't better than the Russ' car thing.

Anyhow, you said why you think Russ is strong, not why its stronger.

I'm much stronger than my little bro, who is my peer. Take the weakest mma fighter who is laughed at by his peers vs. Me. I'd loose.

We have to look at the individual, not how well he stacks up against his peers.

Originally posted by BloodRain
Tossing humans and decap isn't better than the Russ' car thing.

Anyhow, you said why you think Russ is strong, not why its stronger.

Tossed a vampire who was 2,000 years old.

I think so.

That's why he's stronger since we never see any strength of Eds ever easily destroy his enemies.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
I'm much stronger than my little bro, who is my peer. Take the weakest mma fighter who is laughed at by his peers vs. Me. I'd loose.

We have to look at the individual, not how well he stacks up against his peers.

I am looking as well as looking at his peers and their feats.

Then you should know the average twilivamp is more powerful than the ones Russ goes up against. Meaning the ease in which the defeat their enemies shouldn't be used in a fight between thr two.