The Official "Argue with Quan about Zelda" Thread

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Midna was more concerned about others than herself, while dying and tried to stop Zelda from saving her at personal cost.

Midna was utterly selfless by mid game. Inarguably. You cannot prove otherwise, despite claiming as much.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I never once claimed otherwise. 😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Not caring about the other realm is what makes it selfish.

Trying to save the Twili.

SELFish.

Quan, do you know what the word "change" means?

Originally posted by The Scenario
Trying to save the Twili.

SELFish.

Quan, do you know what the word "change" means?

She is like any other person capable of selfish and selfless choices.

And she changed.

So, like Scenario asked, do you know what change means?

Wait, do you honestly think link is the only goodperson and ganondorf the only bad person in all of hyrule?

Originally posted by quanchi112
By not initially caring about Hyrule.

She is like any other person capable of selfish and selfless choices.

Not initially, yes. Then she changed her behavior.

Do you think people can change?

Originally posted by The Scenario
Not [b]initially, yes. Then she changed her behavior.

Do you think people can change? [/B]

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
And she changed.

So, like Scenario asked, do you know what change means?

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Wait, do you honestly think link is the only goodperson and ganondorf the only bad person in all of hyrule?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I think people are capable of anything save a select few. Link is good Dorf is evil. Midna is capable of both.

Do agree that someone can go from neutral to good?

You are missing the point. Not surprising.

I'm beginning to question if you ever found the point. Do you understand the concept of character development?

Besides Zelda, what is another GOOD character, in your opinion?

Originally posted by The Scenario
Do agree that someone can go from neutral to good?

I'm beginning to question if you ever found the point. Do you understand the concept of character development?

Originally posted by quanchi112
You are missing the point. Not surprising.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
Besides Zelda, what is another GOOD character, in your opinion?

So just those three and the rest are on permanent neutral, huh?

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
So just those three and the rest are on permanent neutral, huh?

I just want to know where you stand. Can a person outside of those three be good/evil?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I have already answered at length. Just accept that Midna is neutral.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, I do understand it. She is still capable of both good and evil depending on the circumstances and the actions of the others.

"Capable of" is a cop out answer because anyone is capable of any behavior within their power. Linking is perfectly capable of breaking into people's houses at night, destroying all their pottery, and stealing their money.

You seem to have trouble with tenses. Midna was neutral, at least in regard to Hyrule. Currently, Midna is a good person, because she now cares for Hyrule. (She cared before, too, remember how she wanted to save the Zora pre-sacrifice?)