Thor vs A Planet

Originally posted by zopzop
Because it required at least TWO people to accomplish? Understand now? Does Thor walk around with BRB and Stormbreaker in his pocket that he can whip out and do X when he needs it? No, right?

Does Thor walk around with a pocket Herc? No, right?

Does Thor walk around with a pocket God Killer Gorr? No, right?

Standard Gear for Thor is : Thor + Mjolnir. Now let's see Thor with standard gear doing what the OP asked for.

If Bill and Thor destroy a Galaxy by colliding their hammers, it is sufficient evidence to prove that Thor or Bill can destroy a planet by their lonesome. Why can you not understand this concept?

Shared feats are not automatically disqualified. Are you some sort of idiot?

So 9 pages later, 15 + years of feats and all Thor has a shared feat with Gorr? COMMON

You read nine pages? Must have missed the feats posted.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
If Bill and Thor destroy a Galaxy by colliding their hammers, it is sufficient evidence to prove that Thor or Bill can destroy a planet by their lonesome. Why can you not understand this concept?

Shared feats are not automatically disqualified. Are you some sort of idiot?

Show me scans of him planet busting WITHOUT it being shared by another person. You can't because he's never done it. Not in 40+ years and who knows how many HUNDREDS (thousands?) of issues.

That's why we keep dancing around this subject.

Originally posted by xJLxKing
So 9 pages later, 15 + years of feats and all Thor has a shared feat with Gorr? COMMON

Originally posted by xJLxKing
So 9 pages later, 15 + years of feats and all Thor has a shared feat with Gorr? COMMON

It's okay, I don't disagree with you. I think Thor can destroy a planter, just not purely using his strength. He would need to use some enchnaced power

except when he did just that indirectly?

where am i?

Originally posted by zopzop
It took BOTH their hammers colliding INSIDE the portal. How would Thor have done it by himself? How does this translate into planet busting by himself?

Show me scans of him planet busting WITHOUT it being shared by another person. You can't because he's never done it. Not in 40+ years and who knows how many HUNDREDS (thousands?) of issues.

That's why we keep dancing around this subject.

By striking the side of a portal, or any number of methods but the portal was too large for him to destroy it by himself in a reasonable amount of time. Colliding their hammers and creating a big enough boom to destroy the portal was the most efficient method.

I literally told you pages ago that Thor does not have any feats like the ones you're looking for. Now that this is settled, kindly take your arguments and GTFO because it's killing my brain cells.

He has not, and I repeat, has not, stood on a planet and struck the ground destroying it like Beta Ray Bill has.

Originally posted by xJLxKing
I got to pages 5 or 6, all I read is Zopzop asking for more than Gorr feat; and then reading how that is more than enough despite, what? 20 years of feats?

It's okay, I don't disagree with you. I think Thor can destroy a planter, just not purely using his strength. He would need to use some enchnaced power

Originally posted by psycho gundam
except when he did just that indirectly?

where am i?

I know right? Just lawlz worthy.

And continue reading. Feats have been posted. And this double standard where you need a past feat to reaffirm a present feat is hilarious. Two days from now these same guys will be arguing that past feats shouldn't apply to modern Thor because they are too old.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus

I literally told you pages ago that Thor does not have any feats like the ones you're looking for.

And this double standard where you need a past feat to reaffirm a present feat is hilarious.

Originally posted by psycho gundam
except when he did just that indirectly?

where am i?

Is there any other feat?

Can a mod please tell dumb and dumber that just because it's a shared feat, it doesn't mean it's no longer viable as evidence?

By this logic even Odin has never destroyed a planet. Who cares if he busts Galaxies while in a fight with an inferior opponent, it's a shared feat. 😐

Can a mod please tell this dimwit to post another feat. Instead of trying to be constructive and use the 15+ years of feats to provide a feat, he resorts to name calling. Just own up and either admit to there not existing one, but you still believe he can still destroy it. But NOOO, we get this run-around "debate" where you wont admit it; keep posting one shared feat; and name call the other person

👆

Calls me a dimwit then complains about name calling. If you want to play the victim, do it better.

Like I said:

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
He has not, and I repeat, has not, stood on a planet and struck the ground destroying it like Beta Ray Bill has.

Something like this, has never, ever happened for Thor. Now, is there evidence that supports Thor destroying a planet and more? Yes, plenty. He has feats above and beyond planet destroying. And this thread is about whether or not Thor is capable of doing so, and the answer is yes.

Shared feats are not automatically disqualified.

Meh, I kinda agree with ZopZop here.

Not that Thor can't destroy a planet, but that it's a hell of a slippery slope if we start attributing a certain % to either Thor or BRB when they're smashing their hammers together (gayest expression).

Mjolnir and Stormbreaker, for all we know, could create some crazy fugging effect by combining their powers. It might be far more than just twice of what they would accomplish by swinging their hammers by their lonesome selves.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Calls me a dimwit then complains about name calling. If you want to play the victim, do it better.

Like I said:

Something like this, has never, ever happened for Thor. Now, is there evidence that supports Thor destroying a planet and more? Yes, plenty. He has feats above and beyond planet destroying. And this thread is about whether or not Thor is capable of doing so, and the answer is yes.

Shared feats are not automatically disqualified.

Originally posted by curryman
Meh, I kinda agree with ZopZop here.

Not that Thor can't destroy a planet, but that it's a hell of a slippery slope if we start attributing a certain % to either Thor or BRB when they're smashing their hammers together (gayest expression).

Mjolnir and Stormbreaker, for all we know, could create some crazy fugging effect by combining their powers. It might be far more than just twice of what they would accomplish by swinging their hammers by their lonesome selves.

What else would you do? Automatically discard any feat that involves another party? That's some ridiculous shit as most battle feats occur under such circumstances.

And how is giving Bill/Thor each 50% credit a slippery slope? We know they are pretty much identical in power on average.

Possible, but you'd have to provide strong evidence for that.

Originally posted by curryman
Thor or BRB when they're smashing their hammers together (gayest expression).

Originally posted by xJLxKing
I ain't complaining about you calling me names. If I did, I'd just hit the report button. I'm pointing out that you are calling me names because 9 pages later the best you got off is having a shared feat and beating down on anyone who dares challenge it.

So you weren't playing the victim? Fair enough, I can't read minds so I'll take your word for it.

Do you believe that Thor needs to stand on a planet and destroy it with Mjolnir to prove he can bust a planet? It's really that simple.

If the answer is yes, then there's no point even continuing the discussion because Thor might break a Galaxy while fighting with Beta Ray Bill but you still won't believe he can destroy a planet.

Originally posted by xJLxKing
Shared feat and they didn't destroy it in a hit; It was progressive.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Just lawlz worthy.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
So you weren't playing the victim? Fair enough, I can't read minds so I'll take your word for it.

Do you believe that Thor needs to stand on a planet and destroy it with Mjolnir to prove he can bust a planet? It's really that simple.

If the answer is yes, then there's no point even continuing the discussion because Thor might break a Galaxy while fighting with Beta Ray Bill but you still won't believe he can destroy a planet.

"I think Thor can destroy a planet, just not purely using his strength. He would need to use some enhanced power"